Cargando…

Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The timing of surgery for aortic stenosis (AS) is imperfect, and the management of moderate AS and asymptomatic severe AS is still challenging. Myocardial fibrosis (MF) is the main pathological basis of cardiac decompensation in patients with AS and can be detected by cardiovascular magn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Chuan, Liu, Jie, Qin, Shu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263378
_version_ 1784644776384004096
author Zhang, Chuan
Liu, Jie
Qin, Shu
author_facet Zhang, Chuan
Liu, Jie
Qin, Shu
author_sort Zhang, Chuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The timing of surgery for aortic stenosis (AS) is imperfect, and the management of moderate AS and asymptomatic severe AS is still challenging. Myocardial fibrosis (MF) is the main pathological basis of cardiac decompensation in patients with AS and can be detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of MF measured by CMR in patients with AS, which can provide a reference for the timing of aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science to include all studies that investigated the prognostic value of CMR in patients with AS. The search deadline is March 31, 2021. The pooled relative risk (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the biomarkers including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), Native T1 or extracellular volume (ECV) were calculated to evaluate the prognostic value. RESULTS: 13 studies and 2,430 patients with AS were included in this study, the mean or medium follow-up duration for each study was ranged from 6 to 67.2 months. Meta-analysis showed the presence of LGE was associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality (pooled RR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.67–2.74, P < 0.001), cardiac mortality (pooled RR: 3.50, 95% CI: 2.32–5.30, P < 0.001), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (pooled RR: 1.649, 95% CI: 1.23–2.22, P = 0.001). Native T1 was significantly associated with MACEs (pooled RR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.00–4.95; P = 0.049), and higher ECV was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events (pooled HR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.11–2.58; P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The use of CMR to detect MF has a good prognostic value in patients with AS. LGE, Native T1 and ECV measured by CMR can contribute to risk stratification of AS, thereby helping to optimize the timing of AVR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8812989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88129892022-02-04 Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Chuan Liu, Jie Qin, Shu PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The timing of surgery for aortic stenosis (AS) is imperfect, and the management of moderate AS and asymptomatic severe AS is still challenging. Myocardial fibrosis (MF) is the main pathological basis of cardiac decompensation in patients with AS and can be detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of MF measured by CMR in patients with AS, which can provide a reference for the timing of aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science to include all studies that investigated the prognostic value of CMR in patients with AS. The search deadline is March 31, 2021. The pooled relative risk (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the biomarkers including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), Native T1 or extracellular volume (ECV) were calculated to evaluate the prognostic value. RESULTS: 13 studies and 2,430 patients with AS were included in this study, the mean or medium follow-up duration for each study was ranged from 6 to 67.2 months. Meta-analysis showed the presence of LGE was associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality (pooled RR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.67–2.74, P < 0.001), cardiac mortality (pooled RR: 3.50, 95% CI: 2.32–5.30, P < 0.001), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (pooled RR: 1.649, 95% CI: 1.23–2.22, P = 0.001). Native T1 was significantly associated with MACEs (pooled RR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.00–4.95; P = 0.049), and higher ECV was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events (pooled HR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.11–2.58; P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The use of CMR to detect MF has a good prognostic value in patients with AS. LGE, Native T1 and ECV measured by CMR can contribute to risk stratification of AS, thereby helping to optimize the timing of AVR. Public Library of Science 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8812989/ /pubmed/35113967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263378 Text en © 2022 Zhang et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Chuan
Liu, Jie
Qin, Shu
Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with aortic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263378
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangchuan prognosticvalueofcardiacmagneticresonanceinpatientswithaorticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liujie prognosticvalueofcardiacmagneticresonanceinpatientswithaorticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qinshu prognosticvalueofcardiacmagneticresonanceinpatientswithaorticstenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis