Cargando…

의학 전문직업성 평가 척도의 탐색적·확인적 요인분석

PURPOSE: Evaluating the professional attributes of medical students is critical, because medical professionalism is an essential quality of a good doctor. But, few studies have examined the tools for assessing such attributes. This study analyzed factors of medical professionalism in medical student...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Medical Education 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8813361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25813330
http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2012.24.4.339
_version_ 1784644834790735872
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Evaluating the professional attributes of medical students is critical, because medical professionalism is an essential quality of a good doctor. But, few studies have examined the tools for assessing such attributes. This study analyzed factors of medical professionalism in medical students to develop standards that can assess medical professional attributes. METHODS: A total of 1,508 medical students in Korean medical schools or colleges answered a self-assessment survey of medical professionalism elements from 2005 to 2012 that we developed. The survey consisted of core 31 attributes on a 5-point Likert scale. Factor analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0 and AMOS version 20.0. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis revealed six factors with total variance of 59.56%. The factors were termed 'empathy and accountability,' 'self-development skills,' 'academic competence,' 'interpersonal skills,' 'high intelligence,' and 'attitude towards oneself and life.' These factors showed statistically significant correlation (0.310~0.663). From the confirmatory factor analysis a six-factor model were appropriate (CFI=0.873, TLI=0.853, RMSEA=0.065). Cronbach-alpha of six factors ranged from 0.718 to 0.864. CONCLUSION: Good doctors need to have not only appropriate standards of medical knowledge but also skills to understand and communicate well with patients, as well as self-management skills, which should not be overlooked in the medical education curriculum. By optimizing the results of this study, a more refined assessment tool of professionalism can be exploited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8813361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Society of Medical Education
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88133612022-02-09 의학 전문직업성 평가 척도의 탐색적·확인적 요인분석 Korean J Med Educ Original Article PURPOSE: Evaluating the professional attributes of medical students is critical, because medical professionalism is an essential quality of a good doctor. But, few studies have examined the tools for assessing such attributes. This study analyzed factors of medical professionalism in medical students to develop standards that can assess medical professional attributes. METHODS: A total of 1,508 medical students in Korean medical schools or colleges answered a self-assessment survey of medical professionalism elements from 2005 to 2012 that we developed. The survey consisted of core 31 attributes on a 5-point Likert scale. Factor analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0 and AMOS version 20.0. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis revealed six factors with total variance of 59.56%. The factors were termed 'empathy and accountability,' 'self-development skills,' 'academic competence,' 'interpersonal skills,' 'high intelligence,' and 'attitude towards oneself and life.' These factors showed statistically significant correlation (0.310~0.663). From the confirmatory factor analysis a six-factor model were appropriate (CFI=0.873, TLI=0.853, RMSEA=0.065). Cronbach-alpha of six factors ranged from 0.718 to 0.864. CONCLUSION: Good doctors need to have not only appropriate standards of medical knowledge but also skills to understand and communicate well with patients, as well as self-management skills, which should not be overlooked in the medical education curriculum. By optimizing the results of this study, a more refined assessment tool of professionalism can be exploited. The Korean Society of Medical Education 2012-12 2012-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8813361/ /pubmed/25813330 http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2012.24.4.339 Text en © The Korean Society of Medical Education. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
의학 전문직업성 평가 척도의 탐색적·확인적 요인분석
title 의학 전문직업성 평가 척도의 탐색적·확인적 요인분석
title_full 의학 전문직업성 평가 척도의 탐색적·확인적 요인분석
title_fullStr 의학 전문직업성 평가 척도의 탐색적·확인적 요인분석
title_full_unstemmed 의학 전문직업성 평가 척도의 탐색적·확인적 요인분석
title_short 의학 전문직업성 평가 척도의 탐색적·확인적 요인분석
title_sort 의학 전문직업성 평가 척도의 탐색적·확인적 요인분석
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8813361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25813330
http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2012.24.4.339
work_keys_str_mv AT uihagjeonmunjigeobseongpyeonggacheogdouitamsaegjeoghwaginjeogyoinbunseog
AT uihagjeonmunjigeobseongpyeonggacheogdouitamsaegjeoghwaginjeogyoinbunseog