Cargando…

Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath

PURPOSE: To perform a cost analysis between vacuum-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (vmPCNL) and minimally invasive PCNL (MIP) and explore potential predictors of costs associated with the procedures. METHODS: We analyzed data from 225 patients who underwent vmPCNL or MIP at a single tertiary r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lievore, Elena, Zanetti, Stefano Paolo, Fulgheri, Irene, Turetti, Matteo, Silvani, Carlo, Bebi, Carolina, Ripa, Francesco, Lucignani, Gianpaolo, Pozzi, Edoardo, Rocchini, Lorenzo, De Lorenzis, Elisa, Albo, Giancarlo, Longo, Fabrizio, Salonia, Andrea, Montanari, Emanuele, Boeri, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8813798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34432135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03811-5
_version_ 1784644940471468032
author Lievore, Elena
Zanetti, Stefano Paolo
Fulgheri, Irene
Turetti, Matteo
Silvani, Carlo
Bebi, Carolina
Ripa, Francesco
Lucignani, Gianpaolo
Pozzi, Edoardo
Rocchini, Lorenzo
De Lorenzis, Elisa
Albo, Giancarlo
Longo, Fabrizio
Salonia, Andrea
Montanari, Emanuele
Boeri, Luca
author_facet Lievore, Elena
Zanetti, Stefano Paolo
Fulgheri, Irene
Turetti, Matteo
Silvani, Carlo
Bebi, Carolina
Ripa, Francesco
Lucignani, Gianpaolo
Pozzi, Edoardo
Rocchini, Lorenzo
De Lorenzis, Elisa
Albo, Giancarlo
Longo, Fabrizio
Salonia, Andrea
Montanari, Emanuele
Boeri, Luca
author_sort Lievore, Elena
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To perform a cost analysis between vacuum-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (vmPCNL) and minimally invasive PCNL (MIP) and explore potential predictors of costs associated with the procedures. METHODS: We analyzed data from 225 patients who underwent vmPCNL or MIP at a single tertiary referral academic center between January 2016 and December 2020. We collected patients’ demographics, peri-and postoperative data and detailed expense records. After propensity score matching, 108 (66.7%) vmPCNL and 54 (33.3%) MIP procedures were analyzed. Descriptive statistics assessed differences in clinical and operative parameters. Univariable and multivariable linear regression models tested the association between clinical variables and costs. RESULTS: Operative time (OT) was shorter for vmPCNL, and the use of additional instruments to complete litholapaxy was more frequent in MIP (all p ≤ 0.01). Length of stay (LOS) was longer for MIP patients (p = 0.03) and the stone-free (SF) rate was higher after vmPCNL (p = 0.04). The overall instrumentation cost was higher for vmPCNL (p < 0.001), but total procedural costs were equivalent (p = 0.9). However, the overall cost for the hospitalization was higher for MIP than vmPCNL (p = 0.01). Univariable linear regression revealed that patient’s comorbidities, OT, any postoperative complication and LOS were associated with hospitalization costs (all p < 0.001). Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that LOS and OT were associated with hospitalization costs (all p < 0.001), after accounting for vmPCNL procedure, patients’ comorbidities, and complications. CONCLUSION: vmPCNL may represent a valid option due to clinical and economic benefits. Shorter OT, the lower need for disposable equipment and the lower complication rate reduced procedural and hospitalization costs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03811-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8813798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88137982022-02-09 Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath Lievore, Elena Zanetti, Stefano Paolo Fulgheri, Irene Turetti, Matteo Silvani, Carlo Bebi, Carolina Ripa, Francesco Lucignani, Gianpaolo Pozzi, Edoardo Rocchini, Lorenzo De Lorenzis, Elisa Albo, Giancarlo Longo, Fabrizio Salonia, Andrea Montanari, Emanuele Boeri, Luca World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To perform a cost analysis between vacuum-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (vmPCNL) and minimally invasive PCNL (MIP) and explore potential predictors of costs associated with the procedures. METHODS: We analyzed data from 225 patients who underwent vmPCNL or MIP at a single tertiary referral academic center between January 2016 and December 2020. We collected patients’ demographics, peri-and postoperative data and detailed expense records. After propensity score matching, 108 (66.7%) vmPCNL and 54 (33.3%) MIP procedures were analyzed. Descriptive statistics assessed differences in clinical and operative parameters. Univariable and multivariable linear regression models tested the association between clinical variables and costs. RESULTS: Operative time (OT) was shorter for vmPCNL, and the use of additional instruments to complete litholapaxy was more frequent in MIP (all p ≤ 0.01). Length of stay (LOS) was longer for MIP patients (p = 0.03) and the stone-free (SF) rate was higher after vmPCNL (p = 0.04). The overall instrumentation cost was higher for vmPCNL (p < 0.001), but total procedural costs were equivalent (p = 0.9). However, the overall cost for the hospitalization was higher for MIP than vmPCNL (p = 0.01). Univariable linear regression revealed that patient’s comorbidities, OT, any postoperative complication and LOS were associated with hospitalization costs (all p < 0.001). Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that LOS and OT were associated with hospitalization costs (all p < 0.001), after accounting for vmPCNL procedure, patients’ comorbidities, and complications. CONCLUSION: vmPCNL may represent a valid option due to clinical and economic benefits. Shorter OT, the lower need for disposable equipment and the lower complication rate reduced procedural and hospitalization costs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03811-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8813798/ /pubmed/34432135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03811-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Lievore, Elena
Zanetti, Stefano Paolo
Fulgheri, Irene
Turetti, Matteo
Silvani, Carlo
Bebi, Carolina
Ripa, Francesco
Lucignani, Gianpaolo
Pozzi, Edoardo
Rocchini, Lorenzo
De Lorenzis, Elisa
Albo, Giancarlo
Longo, Fabrizio
Salonia, Andrea
Montanari, Emanuele
Boeri, Luca
Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath
title Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath
title_full Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath
title_fullStr Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath
title_full_unstemmed Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath
title_short Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath
title_sort cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8813798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34432135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03811-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lievoreelena costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath
AT zanettistefanopaolo costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath
AT fulgheriirene costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath
AT turettimatteo costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath
AT silvanicarlo costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath
AT bebicarolina costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath
AT ripafrancesco costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath
AT lucignanigianpaolo costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath
AT pozziedoardo costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath
AT rocchinilorenzo costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath
AT delorenziselisa costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath
AT albogiancarlo costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath
AT longofabrizio costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath
AT saloniaandrea costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath
AT montanariemanuele costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath
AT boeriluca costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath