Cargando…
Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath
PURPOSE: To perform a cost analysis between vacuum-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (vmPCNL) and minimally invasive PCNL (MIP) and explore potential predictors of costs associated with the procedures. METHODS: We analyzed data from 225 patients who underwent vmPCNL or MIP at a single tertiary r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8813798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34432135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03811-5 |
_version_ | 1784644940471468032 |
---|---|
author | Lievore, Elena Zanetti, Stefano Paolo Fulgheri, Irene Turetti, Matteo Silvani, Carlo Bebi, Carolina Ripa, Francesco Lucignani, Gianpaolo Pozzi, Edoardo Rocchini, Lorenzo De Lorenzis, Elisa Albo, Giancarlo Longo, Fabrizio Salonia, Andrea Montanari, Emanuele Boeri, Luca |
author_facet | Lievore, Elena Zanetti, Stefano Paolo Fulgheri, Irene Turetti, Matteo Silvani, Carlo Bebi, Carolina Ripa, Francesco Lucignani, Gianpaolo Pozzi, Edoardo Rocchini, Lorenzo De Lorenzis, Elisa Albo, Giancarlo Longo, Fabrizio Salonia, Andrea Montanari, Emanuele Boeri, Luca |
author_sort | Lievore, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To perform a cost analysis between vacuum-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (vmPCNL) and minimally invasive PCNL (MIP) and explore potential predictors of costs associated with the procedures. METHODS: We analyzed data from 225 patients who underwent vmPCNL or MIP at a single tertiary referral academic center between January 2016 and December 2020. We collected patients’ demographics, peri-and postoperative data and detailed expense records. After propensity score matching, 108 (66.7%) vmPCNL and 54 (33.3%) MIP procedures were analyzed. Descriptive statistics assessed differences in clinical and operative parameters. Univariable and multivariable linear regression models tested the association between clinical variables and costs. RESULTS: Operative time (OT) was shorter for vmPCNL, and the use of additional instruments to complete litholapaxy was more frequent in MIP (all p ≤ 0.01). Length of stay (LOS) was longer for MIP patients (p = 0.03) and the stone-free (SF) rate was higher after vmPCNL (p = 0.04). The overall instrumentation cost was higher for vmPCNL (p < 0.001), but total procedural costs were equivalent (p = 0.9). However, the overall cost for the hospitalization was higher for MIP than vmPCNL (p = 0.01). Univariable linear regression revealed that patient’s comorbidities, OT, any postoperative complication and LOS were associated with hospitalization costs (all p < 0.001). Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that LOS and OT were associated with hospitalization costs (all p < 0.001), after accounting for vmPCNL procedure, patients’ comorbidities, and complications. CONCLUSION: vmPCNL may represent a valid option due to clinical and economic benefits. Shorter OT, the lower need for disposable equipment and the lower complication rate reduced procedural and hospitalization costs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03811-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8813798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88137982022-02-09 Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath Lievore, Elena Zanetti, Stefano Paolo Fulgheri, Irene Turetti, Matteo Silvani, Carlo Bebi, Carolina Ripa, Francesco Lucignani, Gianpaolo Pozzi, Edoardo Rocchini, Lorenzo De Lorenzis, Elisa Albo, Giancarlo Longo, Fabrizio Salonia, Andrea Montanari, Emanuele Boeri, Luca World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To perform a cost analysis between vacuum-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (vmPCNL) and minimally invasive PCNL (MIP) and explore potential predictors of costs associated with the procedures. METHODS: We analyzed data from 225 patients who underwent vmPCNL or MIP at a single tertiary referral academic center between January 2016 and December 2020. We collected patients’ demographics, peri-and postoperative data and detailed expense records. After propensity score matching, 108 (66.7%) vmPCNL and 54 (33.3%) MIP procedures were analyzed. Descriptive statistics assessed differences in clinical and operative parameters. Univariable and multivariable linear regression models tested the association between clinical variables and costs. RESULTS: Operative time (OT) was shorter for vmPCNL, and the use of additional instruments to complete litholapaxy was more frequent in MIP (all p ≤ 0.01). Length of stay (LOS) was longer for MIP patients (p = 0.03) and the stone-free (SF) rate was higher after vmPCNL (p = 0.04). The overall instrumentation cost was higher for vmPCNL (p < 0.001), but total procedural costs were equivalent (p = 0.9). However, the overall cost for the hospitalization was higher for MIP than vmPCNL (p = 0.01). Univariable linear regression revealed that patient’s comorbidities, OT, any postoperative complication and LOS were associated with hospitalization costs (all p < 0.001). Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that LOS and OT were associated with hospitalization costs (all p < 0.001), after accounting for vmPCNL procedure, patients’ comorbidities, and complications. CONCLUSION: vmPCNL may represent a valid option due to clinical and economic benefits. Shorter OT, the lower need for disposable equipment and the lower complication rate reduced procedural and hospitalization costs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03811-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8813798/ /pubmed/34432135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03811-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lievore, Elena Zanetti, Stefano Paolo Fulgheri, Irene Turetti, Matteo Silvani, Carlo Bebi, Carolina Ripa, Francesco Lucignani, Gianpaolo Pozzi, Edoardo Rocchini, Lorenzo De Lorenzis, Elisa Albo, Giancarlo Longo, Fabrizio Salonia, Andrea Montanari, Emanuele Boeri, Luca Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath |
title | Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath |
title_full | Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath |
title_fullStr | Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath |
title_short | Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath |
title_sort | cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8813798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34432135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03811-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lievoreelena costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath AT zanettistefanopaolo costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath AT fulgheriirene costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath AT turettimatteo costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath AT silvanicarlo costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath AT bebicarolina costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath AT ripafrancesco costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath AT lucignanigianpaolo costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath AT pozziedoardo costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath AT rocchinilorenzo costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath AT delorenziselisa costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath AT albogiancarlo costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath AT longofabrizio costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath AT saloniaandrea costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath AT montanariemanuele costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath AT boeriluca costanalysisbetweenminipercutaneousnephrolithotomywithandwithoutvacuumassistedaccesssheath |