Cargando…
Gender gap at a large European urological congress: still at the beginning
PURPOSE: Women are underrepresented at scientific conferences, decreasing the visibility of female role models, which are vital for aspiring young female scientists. This investigation aimed to evaluate female representation at the German Society of Urology's (GSoU) annual meeting. METHODS: The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8813805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34219179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03777-4 |
_version_ | 1784644941658456064 |
---|---|
author | Hüsch, Tanja Haferkamp, Axel Thomas, Christian Steffens, Joachim Fornara, Paolo Kranz, Jennifer |
author_facet | Hüsch, Tanja Haferkamp, Axel Thomas, Christian Steffens, Joachim Fornara, Paolo Kranz, Jennifer |
author_sort | Hüsch, Tanja |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Women are underrepresented at scientific conferences, decreasing the visibility of female role models, which are vital for aspiring young female scientists. This investigation aimed to evaluate female representation at the German Society of Urology's (GSoU) annual meeting. METHODS: The programs of the GSoU meeting of 2011, 2018, 2019 and the virtual conference in 2020 were retrospectively quantified by gender and categorized by chair or speaker, type, and topic of the session. Descriptive analysis was applied. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify gender inequity and variables influencing gender distribution. A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 2.504 chairs and speakers were invited to the GSoU meeting in 2018 and 2019. Female speakers or chairs were represented in 17.8%, indicating a gender gap of 64.7%. There were significant differences between session type, topic, and gender distribution for chairs and speakers. The topic surgical techniques were independent variables for both, underrepresented female chairs and speakers, respectively (p < 0.001). Vocational policy and plenary session were not represented by any female chair in 2011, 2018, and 2019. In comparison, the gender gap in 2011 was 74.2%, indicating a gap reduction of 1.2% per year. In a selected virtual program in 2020, the gender gap increased to 70.4%. CONCLUSION: There is still a significant discrepancy between gender representation at the GSoU annual meetings, and gender equity is currently not expected before 50 years. Future efforts should address the implementation of established guidelines for achieving gender equity at urological conferences. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03777-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8813805 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88138052022-02-17 Gender gap at a large European urological congress: still at the beginning Hüsch, Tanja Haferkamp, Axel Thomas, Christian Steffens, Joachim Fornara, Paolo Kranz, Jennifer World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Women are underrepresented at scientific conferences, decreasing the visibility of female role models, which are vital for aspiring young female scientists. This investigation aimed to evaluate female representation at the German Society of Urology's (GSoU) annual meeting. METHODS: The programs of the GSoU meeting of 2011, 2018, 2019 and the virtual conference in 2020 were retrospectively quantified by gender and categorized by chair or speaker, type, and topic of the session. Descriptive analysis was applied. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify gender inequity and variables influencing gender distribution. A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 2.504 chairs and speakers were invited to the GSoU meeting in 2018 and 2019. Female speakers or chairs were represented in 17.8%, indicating a gender gap of 64.7%. There were significant differences between session type, topic, and gender distribution for chairs and speakers. The topic surgical techniques were independent variables for both, underrepresented female chairs and speakers, respectively (p < 0.001). Vocational policy and plenary session were not represented by any female chair in 2011, 2018, and 2019. In comparison, the gender gap in 2011 was 74.2%, indicating a gap reduction of 1.2% per year. In a selected virtual program in 2020, the gender gap increased to 70.4%. CONCLUSION: There is still a significant discrepancy between gender representation at the GSoU annual meetings, and gender equity is currently not expected before 50 years. Future efforts should address the implementation of established guidelines for achieving gender equity at urological conferences. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03777-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-04 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8813805/ /pubmed/34219179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03777-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hüsch, Tanja Haferkamp, Axel Thomas, Christian Steffens, Joachim Fornara, Paolo Kranz, Jennifer Gender gap at a large European urological congress: still at the beginning |
title | Gender gap at a large European urological congress: still at the beginning |
title_full | Gender gap at a large European urological congress: still at the beginning |
title_fullStr | Gender gap at a large European urological congress: still at the beginning |
title_full_unstemmed | Gender gap at a large European urological congress: still at the beginning |
title_short | Gender gap at a large European urological congress: still at the beginning |
title_sort | gender gap at a large european urological congress: still at the beginning |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8813805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34219179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03777-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huschtanja gendergapatalargeeuropeanurologicalcongressstillatthebeginning AT haferkampaxel gendergapatalargeeuropeanurologicalcongressstillatthebeginning AT thomaschristian gendergapatalargeeuropeanurologicalcongressstillatthebeginning AT steffensjoachim gendergapatalargeeuropeanurologicalcongressstillatthebeginning AT fornarapaolo gendergapatalargeeuropeanurologicalcongressstillatthebeginning AT kranzjennifer gendergapatalargeeuropeanurologicalcongressstillatthebeginning |