Cargando…
Rhabdomyosarcoma and pleomorphic sarcoma in the same location: Recurrence or new entity?
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a small group of adult solid malignancies, with risk factors such as environmental factors, genetic predisposition, and prior radiotherapy. In STS patients with a novel swelling, differential diagnoses include recurrence, second primary cancer, metastasis from un...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8813824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33905030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-021-01872-5 |
_version_ | 1784644945387192320 |
---|---|
author | Steiner, Daniel Smolle, Maria Anna Brcic, Iva Leithner, Andreas |
author_facet | Steiner, Daniel Smolle, Maria Anna Brcic, Iva Leithner, Andreas |
author_sort | Steiner, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a small group of adult solid malignancies, with risk factors such as environmental factors, genetic predisposition, and prior radiotherapy. In STS patients with a novel swelling, differential diagnoses include recurrence, second primary cancer, metastasis from unknown primary cancer, and radiation-associated STS, the latter usually occurring approximately 10 years after radiotherapy. We present the case of a 64-year-old male patient with pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma, who underwent resection and radiotherapy. The patient presented again 5 years later with painful swelling in the area of the prior sarcoma, raising suspicion of recurrence. Resection was performed and a diagnosis of pleomorphic sarcoma (not otherwise specified [NOS]) was made. The patient was treated with radiotherapy and remained sarcoma-free for the following 7 years. A molecular analysis of both neoplasms, using RNA next-generation sequencing, did not detect any specific fusions. Due to the lack of rhabdomyoblastic differentiation in the second sarcoma and the low likelihood of a second primary in the same previously irradiated location, the diagnosis of a radiation-associated STS was suggested. This short report illustrates the difficult diagnostic work-up of a presumably radiation-associated STS, as these neoplasms lack characteristic morphological and immunohistochemical features. In our case, the suggested diagnosis may have pointed against another course of radiotherapy in an already irradiation-harmed region. Therefore, a relatively low latency period between surgery, radiotherapy, and diagnosis of another STS should not automatically point towards recurrence and may prompt further in-depth investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8813824 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88138242022-02-10 Rhabdomyosarcoma and pleomorphic sarcoma in the same location: Recurrence or new entity? Steiner, Daniel Smolle, Maria Anna Brcic, Iva Leithner, Andreas Wien Klin Wochenschr Short Report Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a small group of adult solid malignancies, with risk factors such as environmental factors, genetic predisposition, and prior radiotherapy. In STS patients with a novel swelling, differential diagnoses include recurrence, second primary cancer, metastasis from unknown primary cancer, and radiation-associated STS, the latter usually occurring approximately 10 years after radiotherapy. We present the case of a 64-year-old male patient with pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma, who underwent resection and radiotherapy. The patient presented again 5 years later with painful swelling in the area of the prior sarcoma, raising suspicion of recurrence. Resection was performed and a diagnosis of pleomorphic sarcoma (not otherwise specified [NOS]) was made. The patient was treated with radiotherapy and remained sarcoma-free for the following 7 years. A molecular analysis of both neoplasms, using RNA next-generation sequencing, did not detect any specific fusions. Due to the lack of rhabdomyoblastic differentiation in the second sarcoma and the low likelihood of a second primary in the same previously irradiated location, the diagnosis of a radiation-associated STS was suggested. This short report illustrates the difficult diagnostic work-up of a presumably radiation-associated STS, as these neoplasms lack characteristic morphological and immunohistochemical features. In our case, the suggested diagnosis may have pointed against another course of radiotherapy in an already irradiation-harmed region. Therefore, a relatively low latency period between surgery, radiotherapy, and diagnosis of another STS should not automatically point towards recurrence and may prompt further in-depth investigation. Springer Vienna 2021-04-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8813824/ /pubmed/33905030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-021-01872-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Short Report Steiner, Daniel Smolle, Maria Anna Brcic, Iva Leithner, Andreas Rhabdomyosarcoma and pleomorphic sarcoma in the same location: Recurrence or new entity? |
title | Rhabdomyosarcoma and pleomorphic sarcoma in the same location: Recurrence or new entity? |
title_full | Rhabdomyosarcoma and pleomorphic sarcoma in the same location: Recurrence or new entity? |
title_fullStr | Rhabdomyosarcoma and pleomorphic sarcoma in the same location: Recurrence or new entity? |
title_full_unstemmed | Rhabdomyosarcoma and pleomorphic sarcoma in the same location: Recurrence or new entity? |
title_short | Rhabdomyosarcoma and pleomorphic sarcoma in the same location: Recurrence or new entity? |
title_sort | rhabdomyosarcoma and pleomorphic sarcoma in the same location: recurrence or new entity? |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8813824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33905030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-021-01872-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steinerdaniel rhabdomyosarcomaandpleomorphicsarcomainthesamelocationrecurrenceornewentity AT smollemariaanna rhabdomyosarcomaandpleomorphicsarcomainthesamelocationrecurrenceornewentity AT brciciva rhabdomyosarcomaandpleomorphicsarcomainthesamelocationrecurrenceornewentity AT leithnerandreas rhabdomyosarcomaandpleomorphicsarcomainthesamelocationrecurrenceornewentity |