Cargando…

Comparison of clinical outcomes between carbon ion radiotherapy and X-ray radiotherapy for reirradiation in locoregional recurrence of rectal cancer

Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has garnered interest for the treatment of locoregional rectal cancer recurrence. No study has compared CIRT and X-ray radiotherapy (XRT) for reirradiation (reRT) in such cases. We analyzed and compared the clinical outcomes such as local control, overall survival, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Seung Yeun, Takiyama, Hirotoshi, Kang, Jae Hyun, Chang, Jee Suk, Min, Byung Soh, Tsuji, Hiroshi, Yamada, Shigeru, Koom, Woong Sub
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8813922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35115612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05809-4
_version_ 1784644961420967936
author Chung, Seung Yeun
Takiyama, Hirotoshi
Kang, Jae Hyun
Chang, Jee Suk
Min, Byung Soh
Tsuji, Hiroshi
Yamada, Shigeru
Koom, Woong Sub
author_facet Chung, Seung Yeun
Takiyama, Hirotoshi
Kang, Jae Hyun
Chang, Jee Suk
Min, Byung Soh
Tsuji, Hiroshi
Yamada, Shigeru
Koom, Woong Sub
author_sort Chung, Seung Yeun
collection PubMed
description Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has garnered interest for the treatment of locoregional rectal cancer recurrence. No study has compared CIRT and X-ray radiotherapy (XRT) for reirradiation (reRT) in such cases. We analyzed and compared the clinical outcomes such as local control, overall survival, and late toxicity rate between CIRT and XRT, for treating locoregional rectal cancer recurrence. Patients with rectal cancer who received reRT to the pelvis by CIRT or XRT from March 2005 to July 2019 were included. The CIRT treatment schedule was 70.4 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 16 fractions. For the XRT group, the median reRT dose was 50 Gy (range 25–62.5 Gy) with a median of 25 fractions (range 3–33). Thirty-five and 31 patients received CIRT and XRT, respectively. Tumour and treatment characteristics such as recurrence location and chemotherapy treatment differed between the two groups. CIRT showed better control of local recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.17; p = 0.002), better overall survival (HR 0.30; p = 0.004), and lower severe late toxicity rate (HR 0.15; p = 0.015) than XRT. CIRT was effective for treating locoregional rectal cancer recurrence, with high rates of local control and survival, and a low late severe toxicity rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8813922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88139222022-02-07 Comparison of clinical outcomes between carbon ion radiotherapy and X-ray radiotherapy for reirradiation in locoregional recurrence of rectal cancer Chung, Seung Yeun Takiyama, Hirotoshi Kang, Jae Hyun Chang, Jee Suk Min, Byung Soh Tsuji, Hiroshi Yamada, Shigeru Koom, Woong Sub Sci Rep Article Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has garnered interest for the treatment of locoregional rectal cancer recurrence. No study has compared CIRT and X-ray radiotherapy (XRT) for reirradiation (reRT) in such cases. We analyzed and compared the clinical outcomes such as local control, overall survival, and late toxicity rate between CIRT and XRT, for treating locoregional rectal cancer recurrence. Patients with rectal cancer who received reRT to the pelvis by CIRT or XRT from March 2005 to July 2019 were included. The CIRT treatment schedule was 70.4 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 16 fractions. For the XRT group, the median reRT dose was 50 Gy (range 25–62.5 Gy) with a median of 25 fractions (range 3–33). Thirty-five and 31 patients received CIRT and XRT, respectively. Tumour and treatment characteristics such as recurrence location and chemotherapy treatment differed between the two groups. CIRT showed better control of local recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.17; p = 0.002), better overall survival (HR 0.30; p = 0.004), and lower severe late toxicity rate (HR 0.15; p = 0.015) than XRT. CIRT was effective for treating locoregional rectal cancer recurrence, with high rates of local control and survival, and a low late severe toxicity rate. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8813922/ /pubmed/35115612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05809-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Chung, Seung Yeun
Takiyama, Hirotoshi
Kang, Jae Hyun
Chang, Jee Suk
Min, Byung Soh
Tsuji, Hiroshi
Yamada, Shigeru
Koom, Woong Sub
Comparison of clinical outcomes between carbon ion radiotherapy and X-ray radiotherapy for reirradiation in locoregional recurrence of rectal cancer
title Comparison of clinical outcomes between carbon ion radiotherapy and X-ray radiotherapy for reirradiation in locoregional recurrence of rectal cancer
title_full Comparison of clinical outcomes between carbon ion radiotherapy and X-ray radiotherapy for reirradiation in locoregional recurrence of rectal cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical outcomes between carbon ion radiotherapy and X-ray radiotherapy for reirradiation in locoregional recurrence of rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical outcomes between carbon ion radiotherapy and X-ray radiotherapy for reirradiation in locoregional recurrence of rectal cancer
title_short Comparison of clinical outcomes between carbon ion radiotherapy and X-ray radiotherapy for reirradiation in locoregional recurrence of rectal cancer
title_sort comparison of clinical outcomes between carbon ion radiotherapy and x-ray radiotherapy for reirradiation in locoregional recurrence of rectal cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8813922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35115612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05809-4
work_keys_str_mv AT chungseungyeun comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweencarbonionradiotherapyandxrayradiotherapyforreirradiationinlocoregionalrecurrenceofrectalcancer
AT takiyamahirotoshi comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweencarbonionradiotherapyandxrayradiotherapyforreirradiationinlocoregionalrecurrenceofrectalcancer
AT kangjaehyun comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweencarbonionradiotherapyandxrayradiotherapyforreirradiationinlocoregionalrecurrenceofrectalcancer
AT changjeesuk comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweencarbonionradiotherapyandxrayradiotherapyforreirradiationinlocoregionalrecurrenceofrectalcancer
AT minbyungsoh comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweencarbonionradiotherapyandxrayradiotherapyforreirradiationinlocoregionalrecurrenceofrectalcancer
AT tsujihiroshi comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweencarbonionradiotherapyandxrayradiotherapyforreirradiationinlocoregionalrecurrenceofrectalcancer
AT yamadashigeru comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweencarbonionradiotherapyandxrayradiotherapyforreirradiationinlocoregionalrecurrenceofrectalcancer
AT koomwoongsub comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweencarbonionradiotherapyandxrayradiotherapyforreirradiationinlocoregionalrecurrenceofrectalcancer