Cargando…

The Economic Burden of Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Literature Review

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have evaluated the economic burden of lupus nephritis (LN). The aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to assess the economic burden (direct and indirect costs, and healthcare resource utilization [HCRU]) associated with LN, with particular focus on the burden o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Juliette C., Mahajan, Anadi, Scott, David A., Gairy, Kerry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34731412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-021-00368-y
_version_ 1784644997117640704
author Thompson, Juliette C.
Mahajan, Anadi
Scott, David A.
Gairy, Kerry
author_facet Thompson, Juliette C.
Mahajan, Anadi
Scott, David A.
Gairy, Kerry
author_sort Thompson, Juliette C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Few studies have evaluated the economic burden of lupus nephritis (LN). The aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to assess the economic burden (direct and indirect costs, and healthcare resource utilization [HCRU]) associated with LN, with particular focus on the burden of renal flares and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). METHODS: This SLR (GSK study 213531) was conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Searches of the MEDLINE and Embase databases were conducted for English language publications reporting cost or HCRU data in patients with LN (regardless of age or LN histological class) until December 10, 2019. Handsearching of conference proceedings and keyword-based searches in PubMed, Google, and Google Scholar were also conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were identified from 28 publications reporting the cost (n = 19) and HCRU (n = 13) associated with LN. Most studies were from North America (n = 13) and many used administrative claims data (n = 9). LN was associated with substantially higher direct costs (e.g., total annual, hospitalization, and ESKD-related direct costs), total indirect costs, and HCRU (e.g., hospitalization, outpatient services, and medication use) compared with patients without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or non-renal SLE controls. ESKD and dialysis were significant contributors to economic burden. No studies described the cost of renal flares. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus across the 22 studies was that the economic burden of LN is substantial, particularly in active or severe disease, or if there is progression to ESKD. Total direct cost may be underestimated in claims data given the challenges of identifying patients with LN. Further studies are vital to ascertain the cost of renal flares; a renal flare is likely to result in a period of increased HCRU, which could be mitigated by treatments that extend renal remission. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00368-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8814085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88140852022-02-10 The Economic Burden of Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Literature Review Thompson, Juliette C. Mahajan, Anadi Scott, David A. Gairy, Kerry Rheumatol Ther Review INTRODUCTION: Few studies have evaluated the economic burden of lupus nephritis (LN). The aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to assess the economic burden (direct and indirect costs, and healthcare resource utilization [HCRU]) associated with LN, with particular focus on the burden of renal flares and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). METHODS: This SLR (GSK study 213531) was conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Searches of the MEDLINE and Embase databases were conducted for English language publications reporting cost or HCRU data in patients with LN (regardless of age or LN histological class) until December 10, 2019. Handsearching of conference proceedings and keyword-based searches in PubMed, Google, and Google Scholar were also conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were identified from 28 publications reporting the cost (n = 19) and HCRU (n = 13) associated with LN. Most studies were from North America (n = 13) and many used administrative claims data (n = 9). LN was associated with substantially higher direct costs (e.g., total annual, hospitalization, and ESKD-related direct costs), total indirect costs, and HCRU (e.g., hospitalization, outpatient services, and medication use) compared with patients without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or non-renal SLE controls. ESKD and dialysis were significant contributors to economic burden. No studies described the cost of renal flares. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus across the 22 studies was that the economic burden of LN is substantial, particularly in active or severe disease, or if there is progression to ESKD. Total direct cost may be underestimated in claims data given the challenges of identifying patients with LN. Further studies are vital to ascertain the cost of renal flares; a renal flare is likely to result in a period of increased HCRU, which could be mitigated by treatments that extend renal remission. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00368-y. Springer Healthcare 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8814085/ /pubmed/34731412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-021-00368-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Thompson, Juliette C.
Mahajan, Anadi
Scott, David A.
Gairy, Kerry
The Economic Burden of Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Literature Review
title The Economic Burden of Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full The Economic Burden of Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr The Economic Burden of Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed The Economic Burden of Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short The Economic Burden of Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort economic burden of lupus nephritis: a systematic literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34731412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-021-00368-y
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonjuliettec theeconomicburdenoflupusnephritisasystematicliteraturereview
AT mahajananadi theeconomicburdenoflupusnephritisasystematicliteraturereview
AT scottdavida theeconomicburdenoflupusnephritisasystematicliteraturereview
AT gairykerry theeconomicburdenoflupusnephritisasystematicliteraturereview
AT thompsonjuliettec economicburdenoflupusnephritisasystematicliteraturereview
AT mahajananadi economicburdenoflupusnephritisasystematicliteraturereview
AT scottdavida economicburdenoflupusnephritisasystematicliteraturereview
AT gairykerry economicburdenoflupusnephritisasystematicliteraturereview