Cargando…
Novel ensemble intelligence methodologies for rockburst assessment in complex and variable environments
Rockburst is a severe geological hazard that restricts deep mine operations and tunnel constructions. To overcome the shortcomings of widely used algorithms in rockburst prediction, this study investigates the ensemble trees, i.e., random forest (RF), extremely randomized tree (ET), adaptive boostin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35115585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05594-0 |
_version_ | 1784645013963014144 |
---|---|
author | Li, Diyuan Liu, Zida Armaghani, Danial Jahed Xiao, Peng Zhou, Jian |
author_facet | Li, Diyuan Liu, Zida Armaghani, Danial Jahed Xiao, Peng Zhou, Jian |
author_sort | Li, Diyuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rockburst is a severe geological hazard that restricts deep mine operations and tunnel constructions. To overcome the shortcomings of widely used algorithms in rockburst prediction, this study investigates the ensemble trees, i.e., random forest (RF), extremely randomized tree (ET), adaptive boosting machine (AdaBoost), gradient boosting machine, extreme gradient boosting machine (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine, and category gradient boosting machine, for rockburst estimation based on 314 real rockburst cases. Additionally, Bayesian optimization is utilized to optimize these ensemble trees. To improve performance, three combination strategies, voting, bagging, and stacking, are adopted to combine multiple models according to training accuracy. ET and XGBoost receive the best capabilities (85.71% testing accuracy) in single models, and except for AdaBoost, six ensemble trees have high accuracy and can effectively foretell strong rockburst to prevent large-scale underground disasters. The combination models generated by voting, bagging, and stacking perform better than single models, and the voting 2 model that combines XGBoost, ET, and RF with simple soft voting, is the most outstanding (88.89% testing accuracy). The performed sensitivity analysis confirms that the voting 2 model has better robustness than single models and has remarkable adaptation and superiority when input parameters vary or miss, and it has more power to deal with complex and variable engineering environments. Eventually, the rockburst cases in Sanshandao Gold Mine, China, were investigated, and these data verify the practicability of voting 2 in field rockburst prediction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8814189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88141892022-02-07 Novel ensemble intelligence methodologies for rockburst assessment in complex and variable environments Li, Diyuan Liu, Zida Armaghani, Danial Jahed Xiao, Peng Zhou, Jian Sci Rep Article Rockburst is a severe geological hazard that restricts deep mine operations and tunnel constructions. To overcome the shortcomings of widely used algorithms in rockburst prediction, this study investigates the ensemble trees, i.e., random forest (RF), extremely randomized tree (ET), adaptive boosting machine (AdaBoost), gradient boosting machine, extreme gradient boosting machine (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine, and category gradient boosting machine, for rockburst estimation based on 314 real rockburst cases. Additionally, Bayesian optimization is utilized to optimize these ensemble trees. To improve performance, three combination strategies, voting, bagging, and stacking, are adopted to combine multiple models according to training accuracy. ET and XGBoost receive the best capabilities (85.71% testing accuracy) in single models, and except for AdaBoost, six ensemble trees have high accuracy and can effectively foretell strong rockburst to prevent large-scale underground disasters. The combination models generated by voting, bagging, and stacking perform better than single models, and the voting 2 model that combines XGBoost, ET, and RF with simple soft voting, is the most outstanding (88.89% testing accuracy). The performed sensitivity analysis confirms that the voting 2 model has better robustness than single models and has remarkable adaptation and superiority when input parameters vary or miss, and it has more power to deal with complex and variable engineering environments. Eventually, the rockburst cases in Sanshandao Gold Mine, China, were investigated, and these data verify the practicability of voting 2 in field rockburst prediction. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8814189/ /pubmed/35115585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05594-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Diyuan Liu, Zida Armaghani, Danial Jahed Xiao, Peng Zhou, Jian Novel ensemble intelligence methodologies for rockburst assessment in complex and variable environments |
title | Novel ensemble intelligence methodologies for rockburst assessment in complex and variable environments |
title_full | Novel ensemble intelligence methodologies for rockburst assessment in complex and variable environments |
title_fullStr | Novel ensemble intelligence methodologies for rockburst assessment in complex and variable environments |
title_full_unstemmed | Novel ensemble intelligence methodologies for rockburst assessment in complex and variable environments |
title_short | Novel ensemble intelligence methodologies for rockburst assessment in complex and variable environments |
title_sort | novel ensemble intelligence methodologies for rockburst assessment in complex and variable environments |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35115585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05594-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lidiyuan novelensembleintelligencemethodologiesforrockburstassessmentincomplexandvariableenvironments AT liuzida novelensembleintelligencemethodologiesforrockburstassessmentincomplexandvariableenvironments AT armaghanidanialjahed novelensembleintelligencemethodologiesforrockburstassessmentincomplexandvariableenvironments AT xiaopeng novelensembleintelligencemethodologiesforrockburstassessmentincomplexandvariableenvironments AT zhoujian novelensembleintelligencemethodologiesforrockburstassessmentincomplexandvariableenvironments |