Cargando…

의과대학생의 학습윤리의식 검사 도구 개발

PURPOSE: Identifying medical students’ perceptions of and experiences with unprofessional behavior in school can help them develop and maintain higher standards of professional ethics. The aim of this study was to develop an instrument that assesses medical students’ attitudes toward academic miscon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Medical Education 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25804850
http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2013.25.3.211
_version_ 1784645065650470912
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Identifying medical students’ perceptions of and experiences with unprofessional behavior in school can help them develop and maintain higher standards of professional ethics. The aim of this study was to develop an instrument that assesses medical students’ attitudes toward academic misconduct. METHODS: A draft version of the questionnaire form was developed, based on an extensive literature review and iterative discussions. The validity of the content of this draft form was evaluated by medical students, physicians, and education specialists. A total of 803 medical students answered the questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis was performed using principal axis factoring and Varimax rotation. A confirmatory factor analysis was also conducted by root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and comparative fit index (CFI). The internal consistency of the scales was calculated using the Cronbach α statistic. RESULTS: The exploratory factor analysis generated 6 factors with 29 items: scientific misconduct (8 items); irresponsibility in the class (6 items); disrespectful behavior in patient care (5 items); dishonesty in clerkship tasks (4 items); free-riding on group assignments (4 items); and irresponsibility during clerkship (2 items). After adding a single item that addressed cheating on examinations, a 30-item inventory was developed. A confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a favorable RMSEA (0.082) and reasonable fit (CFI, 0.844). The coefficient α for each factor varied between 0.80 and 0.90. CONCLUSION: Our instrument is useful in identifying students’ ethical standards with regard to academics and examining the prevalence of unprofessional behavior in medical students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8814477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Korean Society of Medical Education
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88144772022-02-08 의과대학생의 학습윤리의식 검사 도구 개발 Korean J Med Educ Original Article PURPOSE: Identifying medical students’ perceptions of and experiences with unprofessional behavior in school can help them develop and maintain higher standards of professional ethics. The aim of this study was to develop an instrument that assesses medical students’ attitudes toward academic misconduct. METHODS: A draft version of the questionnaire form was developed, based on an extensive literature review and iterative discussions. The validity of the content of this draft form was evaluated by medical students, physicians, and education specialists. A total of 803 medical students answered the questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis was performed using principal axis factoring and Varimax rotation. A confirmatory factor analysis was also conducted by root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and comparative fit index (CFI). The internal consistency of the scales was calculated using the Cronbach α statistic. RESULTS: The exploratory factor analysis generated 6 factors with 29 items: scientific misconduct (8 items); irresponsibility in the class (6 items); disrespectful behavior in patient care (5 items); dishonesty in clerkship tasks (4 items); free-riding on group assignments (4 items); and irresponsibility during clerkship (2 items). After adding a single item that addressed cheating on examinations, a 30-item inventory was developed. A confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a favorable RMSEA (0.082) and reasonable fit (CFI, 0.844). The coefficient α for each factor varied between 0.80 and 0.90. CONCLUSION: Our instrument is useful in identifying students’ ethical standards with regard to academics and examining the prevalence of unprofessional behavior in medical students. The Korean Society of Medical Education 2013-09 2013-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8814477/ /pubmed/25804850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2013.25.3.211 Text en © The Korean Society of Medical Education. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
의과대학생의 학습윤리의식 검사 도구 개발
title 의과대학생의 학습윤리의식 검사 도구 개발
title_full 의과대학생의 학습윤리의식 검사 도구 개발
title_fullStr 의과대학생의 학습윤리의식 검사 도구 개발
title_full_unstemmed 의과대학생의 학습윤리의식 검사 도구 개발
title_short 의과대학생의 학습윤리의식 검사 도구 개발
title_sort 의과대학생의 학습윤리의식 검사 도구 개발
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25804850
http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2013.25.3.211
work_keys_str_mv AT uigwadaehagsaenguihagseubyunliuisiggeomsadogugaebal
AT uigwadaehagsaenguihagseubyunliuisiggeomsadogugaebal
AT uigwadaehagsaenguihagseubyunliuisiggeomsadogugaebal