Cargando…

의학전문대학원 논문 작성 교육과정 운영 경험

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of the medical research curriculum on the students' satisfaction and the research self-efficacy. METHODS: The curriculum was implemented to 79 graduate medical school students who entered in 2007 and 2008. This curriculum is implement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Medical Education 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25812558
http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2011.23.2.103
_version_ 1784645070780104704
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of the medical research curriculum on the students' satisfaction and the research self-efficacy. METHODS: The curriculum was implemented to 79 graduate medical school students who entered in 2007 and 2008. This curriculum is implemented through 3 years consisting of 5 different sub-courses: Research design, Research ethics, Medical statistics, Writing medical paper, and Presentation. The effect of this program was measured with 2 self-administered surveys to students: the course satisfaction survey and the self-efficacy inventories. The Research Self-Efficacy Scale consisted of 18 items from 4 categories: Research design, Research ethics, Data analysis, and Result presentation. The descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were implemented. RESULTS: The average point of satisfaction of the course was 2.74 out of 4, which told us that students generally satisfied with the course. The frequencies of tutoring for research course were 2 or 3 times on average and each session of tutorial lasted 1.5 to 2 hours. The research self-efficacy in three categories (Research design, Research ethics, and Result presentation) increased significantly (p<0.1). The self-efficacy of the male students was higher than females' one. The self-efficacy was not significantly different by the experience of research paper writing at undergraduate level. CONCLUSION: The curriculum showed positive results in cultivating research self-efficacy of students. There is a need for improvement of the class of Statistical analysis as students reported that it was difficult.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8814498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher The Korean Society of Medical Education
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88144982022-02-09 의학전문대학원 논문 작성 교육과정 운영 경험 Korean J Med Educ Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of the medical research curriculum on the students' satisfaction and the research self-efficacy. METHODS: The curriculum was implemented to 79 graduate medical school students who entered in 2007 and 2008. This curriculum is implemented through 3 years consisting of 5 different sub-courses: Research design, Research ethics, Medical statistics, Writing medical paper, and Presentation. The effect of this program was measured with 2 self-administered surveys to students: the course satisfaction survey and the self-efficacy inventories. The Research Self-Efficacy Scale consisted of 18 items from 4 categories: Research design, Research ethics, Data analysis, and Result presentation. The descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were implemented. RESULTS: The average point of satisfaction of the course was 2.74 out of 4, which told us that students generally satisfied with the course. The frequencies of tutoring for research course were 2 or 3 times on average and each session of tutorial lasted 1.5 to 2 hours. The research self-efficacy in three categories (Research design, Research ethics, and Result presentation) increased significantly (p<0.1). The self-efficacy of the male students was higher than females' one. The self-efficacy was not significantly different by the experience of research paper writing at undergraduate level. CONCLUSION: The curriculum showed positive results in cultivating research self-efficacy of students. There is a need for improvement of the class of Statistical analysis as students reported that it was difficult. The Korean Society of Medical Education 2011-06 2011-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8814498/ /pubmed/25812558 http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2011.23.2.103 Text en © The Korean Society of Medical Education. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
의학전문대학원 논문 작성 교육과정 운영 경험
title 의학전문대학원 논문 작성 교육과정 운영 경험
title_full 의학전문대학원 논문 작성 교육과정 운영 경험
title_fullStr 의학전문대학원 논문 작성 교육과정 운영 경험
title_full_unstemmed 의학전문대학원 논문 작성 교육과정 운영 경험
title_short 의학전문대학원 논문 작성 교육과정 운영 경험
title_sort 의학전문대학원 논문 작성 교육과정 운영 경험
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25812558
http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2011.23.2.103
work_keys_str_mv AT uihagjeonmundaehagwonnonmunjagseonggyoyuggwajeongunyeonggyeongheom
AT uihagjeonmundaehagwonnonmunjagseonggyoyuggwajeongunyeonggyeongheom
AT uihagjeonmundaehagwonnonmunjagseonggyoyuggwajeongunyeonggyeongheom