Cargando…

Use of YouTube as an Information Source for Radioactive Iodine Therapy: Do YouTube Videos Have High Quality?

OBJECTIVES: Radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy is a radionuclide treatment for hyperthyroidism and well-differentiated thyroid cancer. One of the most popular sources of information for patients on the internet is YouTube. This study aimed to examine the quality of videos about RAI treatment. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Şan, Hüseyin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35114751
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2021.85530
_version_ 1784645088559759360
author Şan, Hüseyin
author_facet Şan, Hüseyin
author_sort Şan, Hüseyin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy is a radionuclide treatment for hyperthyroidism and well-differentiated thyroid cancer. One of the most popular sources of information for patients on the internet is YouTube. This study aimed to examine the quality of videos about RAI treatment. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed by using videos in YouTube. The terms “radyoaktif iyot tedavisi” and “radioactive iodine treatment” were used to search related videos in June 2021. The quality of the videos was assessed by using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the DISCERN scale, and the global quality scale (GQS). RESULTS: Of the total 88 videos evaluated, 56 videos (30 in English, 26 in Turkish) were analyzed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Seven (12.5%) videos were assigned to the high-quality group, 16 (28.58%) to the intermediate quality group, and 33 (58.92%) to the low quality group. The findings of this study showed that the most popular videos with the highest video power index (VPI) scores and the highest number of video likes and comments belonged to the intermediate quality group. Contrarily, popularity level, number of video likes, and number of video views were the lowest in the high-quality group. The analysis of video sources revealed that viewers most preferred non-physician-sourced videos, with average total views of 59307.80 [standard deviation (SD): 122554.13]. The most liked videos were non-physician-made videos, with average total likes of 424.35 (SD: 639.41). The mean VPI scores were the highest in non-physician-made videos, with 25.18 (SD: 25.69). The average JAMA (1.92, SD: 0.50), DISCERN (34.31, SD: 14.33), and GQS scores (2.61, SD: 0.99) were the highest in physician-made videos. CONCLUSION: Although high-quality videos on YouTube may inform and encourage patients positively, unprofessional, incorrect, and incomplete information can be also uploaded on YouTube and may mislead patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8814551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88145512022-02-16 Use of YouTube as an Information Source for Radioactive Iodine Therapy: Do YouTube Videos Have High Quality? Şan, Hüseyin Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther Original Article OBJECTIVES: Radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy is a radionuclide treatment for hyperthyroidism and well-differentiated thyroid cancer. One of the most popular sources of information for patients on the internet is YouTube. This study aimed to examine the quality of videos about RAI treatment. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed by using videos in YouTube. The terms “radyoaktif iyot tedavisi” and “radioactive iodine treatment” were used to search related videos in June 2021. The quality of the videos was assessed by using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the DISCERN scale, and the global quality scale (GQS). RESULTS: Of the total 88 videos evaluated, 56 videos (30 in English, 26 in Turkish) were analyzed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Seven (12.5%) videos were assigned to the high-quality group, 16 (28.58%) to the intermediate quality group, and 33 (58.92%) to the low quality group. The findings of this study showed that the most popular videos with the highest video power index (VPI) scores and the highest number of video likes and comments belonged to the intermediate quality group. Contrarily, popularity level, number of video likes, and number of video views were the lowest in the high-quality group. The analysis of video sources revealed that viewers most preferred non-physician-sourced videos, with average total views of 59307.80 [standard deviation (SD): 122554.13]. The most liked videos were non-physician-made videos, with average total likes of 424.35 (SD: 639.41). The mean VPI scores were the highest in non-physician-made videos, with 25.18 (SD: 25.69). The average JAMA (1.92, SD: 0.50), DISCERN (34.31, SD: 14.33), and GQS scores (2.61, SD: 0.99) were the highest in physician-made videos. CONCLUSION: Although high-quality videos on YouTube may inform and encourage patients positively, unprofessional, incorrect, and incomplete information can be also uploaded on YouTube and may mislead patients. Galenos Publishing 2022-02 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8814551/ /pubmed/35114751 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2021.85530 Text en ©Copyright 2022 by Turkish Society of Nuclear Medicine | Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy published by Galenos Yayınevi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Şan, Hüseyin
Use of YouTube as an Information Source for Radioactive Iodine Therapy: Do YouTube Videos Have High Quality?
title Use of YouTube as an Information Source for Radioactive Iodine Therapy: Do YouTube Videos Have High Quality?
title_full Use of YouTube as an Information Source for Radioactive Iodine Therapy: Do YouTube Videos Have High Quality?
title_fullStr Use of YouTube as an Information Source for Radioactive Iodine Therapy: Do YouTube Videos Have High Quality?
title_full_unstemmed Use of YouTube as an Information Source for Radioactive Iodine Therapy: Do YouTube Videos Have High Quality?
title_short Use of YouTube as an Information Source for Radioactive Iodine Therapy: Do YouTube Videos Have High Quality?
title_sort use of youtube as an information source for radioactive iodine therapy: do youtube videos have high quality?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35114751
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/mirt.galenos.2021.85530
work_keys_str_mv AT sanhuseyin useofyoutubeasaninformationsourceforradioactiveiodinetherapydoyoutubevideoshavehighquality