Cargando…
RipetaScore: Measuring the Quality, Transparency, and Trustworthiness of a Scientific Work
A wide array of existing metrics quantifies a scientific paper's prominence or the author's prestige. Many who use these metrics make assumptions that higher citation counts or more public attention must indicate more reliable, better quality science. While current metrics offer valuable i...
Autores principales: | Sumner, Josh Q., Vitale, Cynthia Hudson, McIntosh, Leslie D. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.751734 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Coordinating culture change across the research landscape
por: McIntosh, Leslie D., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The core of the matter: How do scientists judge trustworthiness of physical samples?
por: Darch, Peter Thomas
Publicado: (2022) -
For Augustinian Archival Openness and Laggardly Sharing: Trustworthy Archiving and Sharing of Social Science Data From Identifiable Human Subjects
por: Zeitlyn, David
Publicado: (2021) -
The Essence and Transcendence of Scientific Publishing
por: Medina-Franco, José L., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Chinese institutions should be more proactive and transparent in promoting research integrity: A perspective
por: Zhang, Haihong
Publicado: (2022)