Cargando…

Systematic review on quantifying pedestrian injury when evaluating changes to the built environment

Modifying the built environment to make communities more walkable remains one strategy to promote physical activity. These modifications may have the added benefit of reducing the risk of pedestrian injury; however, there is a gap in the physical activity literature regarding how best to measure ped...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pollack Porter, Keshia M., Omura, John D., Ballard, Rachel M., Peterson, Erin L., Carlson, Susan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35141117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101703
_version_ 1784645108443906048
author Pollack Porter, Keshia M.
Omura, John D.
Ballard, Rachel M.
Peterson, Erin L.
Carlson, Susan A.
author_facet Pollack Porter, Keshia M.
Omura, John D.
Ballard, Rachel M.
Peterson, Erin L.
Carlson, Susan A.
author_sort Pollack Porter, Keshia M.
collection PubMed
description Modifying the built environment to make communities more walkable remains one strategy to promote physical activity. These modifications may have the added benefit of reducing the risk of pedestrian injury; however, there is a gap in the physical activity literature regarding how best to measure pedestrian injury. Examining the measures that have been used and related data sources can help inform the use of pedestrian injury data to evaluate whether safety is optimized as walking increases. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify studies that evaluated changes to the built environment that support walking and measures impacts on pedestrian injury as a measure of safety. We searched PubMed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science to identify peer-review studies and websites of fifteen organizations to document studies from the grey literature published in English between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2018. Our search identified twelve studies that met the inclusion criteria. The few studies that measured changes in pedestrian injury used crash data from police reports. Injury frequency was often reported, but not injury severity, and no studies reported injury risk based on walking exposure. We conclude that few studies have measured pedestrian injury in the context of creating more walkable communities. Future research would benefit from using well-characterized measures from existing studies to support consistency in measurement, and from more longitudinal and evaluation research to strengthen the evidence on additional benefits of walkability. Increased collaborations with injury prevention professionals could bolster use of valid and reliable measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8814639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88146392022-02-08 Systematic review on quantifying pedestrian injury when evaluating changes to the built environment Pollack Porter, Keshia M. Omura, John D. Ballard, Rachel M. Peterson, Erin L. Carlson, Susan A. Prev Med Rep Review Article Modifying the built environment to make communities more walkable remains one strategy to promote physical activity. These modifications may have the added benefit of reducing the risk of pedestrian injury; however, there is a gap in the physical activity literature regarding how best to measure pedestrian injury. Examining the measures that have been used and related data sources can help inform the use of pedestrian injury data to evaluate whether safety is optimized as walking increases. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify studies that evaluated changes to the built environment that support walking and measures impacts on pedestrian injury as a measure of safety. We searched PubMed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science to identify peer-review studies and websites of fifteen organizations to document studies from the grey literature published in English between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2018. Our search identified twelve studies that met the inclusion criteria. The few studies that measured changes in pedestrian injury used crash data from police reports. Injury frequency was often reported, but not injury severity, and no studies reported injury risk based on walking exposure. We conclude that few studies have measured pedestrian injury in the context of creating more walkable communities. Future research would benefit from using well-characterized measures from existing studies to support consistency in measurement, and from more longitudinal and evaluation research to strengthen the evidence on additional benefits of walkability. Increased collaborations with injury prevention professionals could bolster use of valid and reliable measures. 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8814639/ /pubmed/35141117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101703 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Pollack Porter, Keshia M.
Omura, John D.
Ballard, Rachel M.
Peterson, Erin L.
Carlson, Susan A.
Systematic review on quantifying pedestrian injury when evaluating changes to the built environment
title Systematic review on quantifying pedestrian injury when evaluating changes to the built environment
title_full Systematic review on quantifying pedestrian injury when evaluating changes to the built environment
title_fullStr Systematic review on quantifying pedestrian injury when evaluating changes to the built environment
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review on quantifying pedestrian injury when evaluating changes to the built environment
title_short Systematic review on quantifying pedestrian injury when evaluating changes to the built environment
title_sort systematic review on quantifying pedestrian injury when evaluating changes to the built environment
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35141117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101703
work_keys_str_mv AT pollackporterkeshiam systematicreviewonquantifyingpedestrianinjurywhenevaluatingchangestothebuiltenvironment
AT omurajohnd systematicreviewonquantifyingpedestrianinjurywhenevaluatingchangestothebuiltenvironment
AT ballardrachelm systematicreviewonquantifyingpedestrianinjurywhenevaluatingchangestothebuiltenvironment
AT petersonerinl systematicreviewonquantifyingpedestrianinjurywhenevaluatingchangestothebuiltenvironment
AT carlsonsusana systematicreviewonquantifyingpedestrianinjurywhenevaluatingchangestothebuiltenvironment