Cargando…

Comparison of Core Needle Biopsy and Repeat Fine-Needle Aspiration in Avoiding Diagnostic Surgery for Thyroid Nodules Initially Diagnosed as Atypia/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance

OBJECTIVE: To compare core needle biopsy (CNB) and repeat fine-needle aspiration (rFNA) to reduce the rate of diagnostic surgery and prevent unnecessary surgery in nodules initially diagnosed as atypia/follicular lesions of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study incl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joo, Leehi, Na, Dong Gyu, Kim, Ji-hoon, Seo, Hyobin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35029081
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0619
_version_ 1784645119183421440
author Joo, Leehi
Na, Dong Gyu
Kim, Ji-hoon
Seo, Hyobin
author_facet Joo, Leehi
Na, Dong Gyu
Kim, Ji-hoon
Seo, Hyobin
author_sort Joo, Leehi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare core needle biopsy (CNB) and repeat fine-needle aspiration (rFNA) to reduce the rate of diagnostic surgery and prevent unnecessary surgery in nodules initially diagnosed as atypia/follicular lesions of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 231 consecutive patients (150 female and 81 male; mean age ± standard deviation, 51.9 ± 11.7 years) with 235 thyroid nodules (≥ 1 cm) initially diagnosed as AUS/FLUS, who later underwent both rFNA and CNB. The nodules that required diagnostic surgery after the biopsy were defined using three different scenarios according to the rFNA and CNB results: criterion 1, surgery for low-risk indeterminate (categories I and III); criterion 2, surgery for high-risk indeterminate (categories IV and V); and criterion 3, surgery for all indeterminate nodules (categories I, III, IV, and V). We compared the expected rates of diagnostic surgery between CNB and rFNA in all 235 nodules using the three surgical criteria. In addition, the expected rates of unnecessary surgery (i.e., surgery for benign pathology) were compared in a subgroup of 182 nodules with available final diagnoses. RESULTS: CNB showed significantly lower rates of nondiagnostic, AUS/FLUS, and suspicious for malignancy diagnoses (p ≤ 0.016) and higher rates of follicular neoplasm or suspicious for a follicular neoplasm (p < 0.001) and malignant diagnoses (p = 0.031). CNB showed a significantly lower expected rate of diagnostic surgery than rFNA for criterion 1 (29.8% vs. 48.1%, p < 0.001) and criterion 3 (46.4% vs. 55.3%, p = 0.029), and a significantly higher rate for criterion 2 (16.6% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.001). CNB showed a significantly lower expected rate of unnecessary surgery than rFNA for criterion 1 (18.7% vs. 29.7%, p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: CNB was superior to rFNA in reducing the rates of potential diagnostic surgery and unnecessary surgery for nodules initially diagnosed as AUS/FLUS in a scenario where nodules with low-risk indeterminate results (categories I and III) would undergo surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8814697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88146972022-02-10 Comparison of Core Needle Biopsy and Repeat Fine-Needle Aspiration in Avoiding Diagnostic Surgery for Thyroid Nodules Initially Diagnosed as Atypia/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance Joo, Leehi Na, Dong Gyu Kim, Ji-hoon Seo, Hyobin Korean J Radiol Thyroid OBJECTIVE: To compare core needle biopsy (CNB) and repeat fine-needle aspiration (rFNA) to reduce the rate of diagnostic surgery and prevent unnecessary surgery in nodules initially diagnosed as atypia/follicular lesions of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 231 consecutive patients (150 female and 81 male; mean age ± standard deviation, 51.9 ± 11.7 years) with 235 thyroid nodules (≥ 1 cm) initially diagnosed as AUS/FLUS, who later underwent both rFNA and CNB. The nodules that required diagnostic surgery after the biopsy were defined using three different scenarios according to the rFNA and CNB results: criterion 1, surgery for low-risk indeterminate (categories I and III); criterion 2, surgery for high-risk indeterminate (categories IV and V); and criterion 3, surgery for all indeterminate nodules (categories I, III, IV, and V). We compared the expected rates of diagnostic surgery between CNB and rFNA in all 235 nodules using the three surgical criteria. In addition, the expected rates of unnecessary surgery (i.e., surgery for benign pathology) were compared in a subgroup of 182 nodules with available final diagnoses. RESULTS: CNB showed significantly lower rates of nondiagnostic, AUS/FLUS, and suspicious for malignancy diagnoses (p ≤ 0.016) and higher rates of follicular neoplasm or suspicious for a follicular neoplasm (p < 0.001) and malignant diagnoses (p = 0.031). CNB showed a significantly lower expected rate of diagnostic surgery than rFNA for criterion 1 (29.8% vs. 48.1%, p < 0.001) and criterion 3 (46.4% vs. 55.3%, p = 0.029), and a significantly higher rate for criterion 2 (16.6% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.001). CNB showed a significantly lower expected rate of unnecessary surgery than rFNA for criterion 1 (18.7% vs. 29.7%, p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: CNB was superior to rFNA in reducing the rates of potential diagnostic surgery and unnecessary surgery for nodules initially diagnosed as AUS/FLUS in a scenario where nodules with low-risk indeterminate results (categories I and III) would undergo surgery. The Korean Society of Radiology 2022-02 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8814697/ /pubmed/35029081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0619 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Korean Society of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Thyroid
Joo, Leehi
Na, Dong Gyu
Kim, Ji-hoon
Seo, Hyobin
Comparison of Core Needle Biopsy and Repeat Fine-Needle Aspiration in Avoiding Diagnostic Surgery for Thyroid Nodules Initially Diagnosed as Atypia/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance
title Comparison of Core Needle Biopsy and Repeat Fine-Needle Aspiration in Avoiding Diagnostic Surgery for Thyroid Nodules Initially Diagnosed as Atypia/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance
title_full Comparison of Core Needle Biopsy and Repeat Fine-Needle Aspiration in Avoiding Diagnostic Surgery for Thyroid Nodules Initially Diagnosed as Atypia/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance
title_fullStr Comparison of Core Needle Biopsy and Repeat Fine-Needle Aspiration in Avoiding Diagnostic Surgery for Thyroid Nodules Initially Diagnosed as Atypia/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Core Needle Biopsy and Repeat Fine-Needle Aspiration in Avoiding Diagnostic Surgery for Thyroid Nodules Initially Diagnosed as Atypia/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance
title_short Comparison of Core Needle Biopsy and Repeat Fine-Needle Aspiration in Avoiding Diagnostic Surgery for Thyroid Nodules Initially Diagnosed as Atypia/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance
title_sort comparison of core needle biopsy and repeat fine-needle aspiration in avoiding diagnostic surgery for thyroid nodules initially diagnosed as atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance
topic Thyroid
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35029081
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0619
work_keys_str_mv AT jooleehi comparisonofcoreneedlebiopsyandrepeatfineneedleaspirationinavoidingdiagnosticsurgeryforthyroidnodulesinitiallydiagnosedasatypiafollicularlesionofundeterminedsignificance
AT nadonggyu comparisonofcoreneedlebiopsyandrepeatfineneedleaspirationinavoidingdiagnosticsurgeryforthyroidnodulesinitiallydiagnosedasatypiafollicularlesionofundeterminedsignificance
AT kimjihoon comparisonofcoreneedlebiopsyandrepeatfineneedleaspirationinavoidingdiagnosticsurgeryforthyroidnodulesinitiallydiagnosedasatypiafollicularlesionofundeterminedsignificance
AT seohyobin comparisonofcoreneedlebiopsyandrepeatfineneedleaspirationinavoidingdiagnosticsurgeryforthyroidnodulesinitiallydiagnosedasatypiafollicularlesionofundeterminedsignificance