Cargando…

Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study)

Patients and families are entitled to an open disclosure and discussion of healthcare incidents affecting them. This reduces distress and contributes to learning for safety improvement. Complex barriers prevent effective disclosure and continue in the English NHS, despite a legal duty of candour. NH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adams, Mary, Iedema, Rick, Heazell, Alexander Edward, Treadwell, Maureen, Booker, Maria, Bevan, Charlotte, Hartley, Julie, Sandall, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35115347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048285
_version_ 1784645131547181056
author Adams, Mary
Iedema, Rick
Heazell, Alexander Edward
Treadwell, Maureen
Booker, Maria
Bevan, Charlotte
Hartley, Julie
Sandall, Jane
author_facet Adams, Mary
Iedema, Rick
Heazell, Alexander Edward
Treadwell, Maureen
Booker, Maria
Bevan, Charlotte
Hartley, Julie
Sandall, Jane
author_sort Adams, Mary
collection PubMed
description Patients and families are entitled to an open disclosure and discussion of healthcare incidents affecting them. This reduces distress and contributes to learning for safety improvement. Complex barriers prevent effective disclosure and continue in the English NHS, despite a legal duty of candour. NHS maternity services are the focus of significant efforts to improve this. There is limited understanding of how, and to what effect, they are achieving this. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A 27-month, three-phased realist evaluation identifying the critical factors contributing to improvements in the disclosure and discussion of incidents with affected families. The evaluation asks ‘what works, for whom, in what circumstances, in why respects and why?’. Phase 1: establish working hypotheses of key factors and outcomes of interventions improving disclosure and discussion, by realist literature review and in-depth realist interviews with key stakeholders (n=approximately 20] Phase 2: refine or overturn hypotheses, by ethnographic case-study analysis using triangulated qualitative methods (non-participant observation, interviews (n=12) and documentary analysis) in up to 4 purposively sampled NHS trusts. Phase 3: consider hypotheses and design outputs during seven interpretive forums. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Phase 1 study approval by King’s College London’s Ethics Panel (BDMRESC 22033) and National Research Ethical Approval for Phases 2–3 (IRASID:262197) (CAG:20/CAG/0121) (REC:20/LO/1152). Study sponsorship by King’s College London (HS&DR 17/99/85). Findings to be disseminated through tailored management briefings; clinician and family guidance (written and video); lay summaries, academic papers, and report with outputs tailored to maximise academic and societal impact. Views of women/family groups are represented throughout.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8814750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88147502022-02-16 Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study) Adams, Mary Iedema, Rick Heazell, Alexander Edward Treadwell, Maureen Booker, Maria Bevan, Charlotte Hartley, Julie Sandall, Jane BMJ Open Qualitative Research Patients and families are entitled to an open disclosure and discussion of healthcare incidents affecting them. This reduces distress and contributes to learning for safety improvement. Complex barriers prevent effective disclosure and continue in the English NHS, despite a legal duty of candour. NHS maternity services are the focus of significant efforts to improve this. There is limited understanding of how, and to what effect, they are achieving this. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A 27-month, three-phased realist evaluation identifying the critical factors contributing to improvements in the disclosure and discussion of incidents with affected families. The evaluation asks ‘what works, for whom, in what circumstances, in why respects and why?’. Phase 1: establish working hypotheses of key factors and outcomes of interventions improving disclosure and discussion, by realist literature review and in-depth realist interviews with key stakeholders (n=approximately 20] Phase 2: refine or overturn hypotheses, by ethnographic case-study analysis using triangulated qualitative methods (non-participant observation, interviews (n=12) and documentary analysis) in up to 4 purposively sampled NHS trusts. Phase 3: consider hypotheses and design outputs during seven interpretive forums. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Phase 1 study approval by King’s College London’s Ethics Panel (BDMRESC 22033) and National Research Ethical Approval for Phases 2–3 (IRASID:262197) (CAG:20/CAG/0121) (REC:20/LO/1152). Study sponsorship by King’s College London (HS&DR 17/99/85). Findings to be disseminated through tailored management briefings; clinician and family guidance (written and video); lay summaries, academic papers, and report with outputs tailored to maximise academic and societal impact. Views of women/family groups are represented throughout. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8814750/ /pubmed/35115347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048285 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Adams, Mary
Iedema, Rick
Heazell, Alexander Edward
Treadwell, Maureen
Booker, Maria
Bevan, Charlotte
Hartley, Julie
Sandall, Jane
Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study)
title Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study)
title_full Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study)
title_fullStr Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study)
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study)
title_short Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study)
title_sort investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in nhs maternity services (the discern study)
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35115347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048285
work_keys_str_mv AT adamsmary investigationofthecriticalfactorsrequiredtoimprovethedisclosureanddiscussionofharmwithaffectedwomenandfamiliesastudyprotocolforaqualitativerealiststudyinnhsmaternityservicesthediscernstudy
AT iedemarick investigationofthecriticalfactorsrequiredtoimprovethedisclosureanddiscussionofharmwithaffectedwomenandfamiliesastudyprotocolforaqualitativerealiststudyinnhsmaternityservicesthediscernstudy
AT heazellalexanderedward investigationofthecriticalfactorsrequiredtoimprovethedisclosureanddiscussionofharmwithaffectedwomenandfamiliesastudyprotocolforaqualitativerealiststudyinnhsmaternityservicesthediscernstudy
AT treadwellmaureen investigationofthecriticalfactorsrequiredtoimprovethedisclosureanddiscussionofharmwithaffectedwomenandfamiliesastudyprotocolforaqualitativerealiststudyinnhsmaternityservicesthediscernstudy
AT bookermaria investigationofthecriticalfactorsrequiredtoimprovethedisclosureanddiscussionofharmwithaffectedwomenandfamiliesastudyprotocolforaqualitativerealiststudyinnhsmaternityservicesthediscernstudy
AT bevancharlotte investigationofthecriticalfactorsrequiredtoimprovethedisclosureanddiscussionofharmwithaffectedwomenandfamiliesastudyprotocolforaqualitativerealiststudyinnhsmaternityservicesthediscernstudy
AT hartleyjulie investigationofthecriticalfactorsrequiredtoimprovethedisclosureanddiscussionofharmwithaffectedwomenandfamiliesastudyprotocolforaqualitativerealiststudyinnhsmaternityservicesthediscernstudy
AT sandalljane investigationofthecriticalfactorsrequiredtoimprovethedisclosureanddiscussionofharmwithaffectedwomenandfamiliesastudyprotocolforaqualitativerealiststudyinnhsmaternityservicesthediscernstudy