Cargando…
Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study)
Patients and families are entitled to an open disclosure and discussion of healthcare incidents affecting them. This reduces distress and contributes to learning for safety improvement. Complex barriers prevent effective disclosure and continue in the English NHS, despite a legal duty of candour. NH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35115347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048285 |
_version_ | 1784645131547181056 |
---|---|
author | Adams, Mary Iedema, Rick Heazell, Alexander Edward Treadwell, Maureen Booker, Maria Bevan, Charlotte Hartley, Julie Sandall, Jane |
author_facet | Adams, Mary Iedema, Rick Heazell, Alexander Edward Treadwell, Maureen Booker, Maria Bevan, Charlotte Hartley, Julie Sandall, Jane |
author_sort | Adams, Mary |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patients and families are entitled to an open disclosure and discussion of healthcare incidents affecting them. This reduces distress and contributes to learning for safety improvement. Complex barriers prevent effective disclosure and continue in the English NHS, despite a legal duty of candour. NHS maternity services are the focus of significant efforts to improve this. There is limited understanding of how, and to what effect, they are achieving this. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A 27-month, three-phased realist evaluation identifying the critical factors contributing to improvements in the disclosure and discussion of incidents with affected families. The evaluation asks ‘what works, for whom, in what circumstances, in why respects and why?’. Phase 1: establish working hypotheses of key factors and outcomes of interventions improving disclosure and discussion, by realist literature review and in-depth realist interviews with key stakeholders (n=approximately 20] Phase 2: refine or overturn hypotheses, by ethnographic case-study analysis using triangulated qualitative methods (non-participant observation, interviews (n=12) and documentary analysis) in up to 4 purposively sampled NHS trusts. Phase 3: consider hypotheses and design outputs during seven interpretive forums. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Phase 1 study approval by King’s College London’s Ethics Panel (BDMRESC 22033) and National Research Ethical Approval for Phases 2–3 (IRASID:262197) (CAG:20/CAG/0121) (REC:20/LO/1152). Study sponsorship by King’s College London (HS&DR 17/99/85). Findings to be disseminated through tailored management briefings; clinician and family guidance (written and video); lay summaries, academic papers, and report with outputs tailored to maximise academic and societal impact. Views of women/family groups are represented throughout. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8814750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88147502022-02-16 Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study) Adams, Mary Iedema, Rick Heazell, Alexander Edward Treadwell, Maureen Booker, Maria Bevan, Charlotte Hartley, Julie Sandall, Jane BMJ Open Qualitative Research Patients and families are entitled to an open disclosure and discussion of healthcare incidents affecting them. This reduces distress and contributes to learning for safety improvement. Complex barriers prevent effective disclosure and continue in the English NHS, despite a legal duty of candour. NHS maternity services are the focus of significant efforts to improve this. There is limited understanding of how, and to what effect, they are achieving this. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A 27-month, three-phased realist evaluation identifying the critical factors contributing to improvements in the disclosure and discussion of incidents with affected families. The evaluation asks ‘what works, for whom, in what circumstances, in why respects and why?’. Phase 1: establish working hypotheses of key factors and outcomes of interventions improving disclosure and discussion, by realist literature review and in-depth realist interviews with key stakeholders (n=approximately 20] Phase 2: refine or overturn hypotheses, by ethnographic case-study analysis using triangulated qualitative methods (non-participant observation, interviews (n=12) and documentary analysis) in up to 4 purposively sampled NHS trusts. Phase 3: consider hypotheses and design outputs during seven interpretive forums. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Phase 1 study approval by King’s College London’s Ethics Panel (BDMRESC 22033) and National Research Ethical Approval for Phases 2–3 (IRASID:262197) (CAG:20/CAG/0121) (REC:20/LO/1152). Study sponsorship by King’s College London (HS&DR 17/99/85). Findings to be disseminated through tailored management briefings; clinician and family guidance (written and video); lay summaries, academic papers, and report with outputs tailored to maximise academic and societal impact. Views of women/family groups are represented throughout. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8814750/ /pubmed/35115347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048285 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Qualitative Research Adams, Mary Iedema, Rick Heazell, Alexander Edward Treadwell, Maureen Booker, Maria Bevan, Charlotte Hartley, Julie Sandall, Jane Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study) |
title | Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study) |
title_full | Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study) |
title_fullStr | Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study) |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study) |
title_short | Investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in NHS maternity services (the DISCERN study) |
title_sort | investigation of the critical factors required to improve the disclosure and discussion of harm with affected women and families: a study protocol for a qualitative, realist study in nhs maternity services (the discern study) |
topic | Qualitative Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35115347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adamsmary investigationofthecriticalfactorsrequiredtoimprovethedisclosureanddiscussionofharmwithaffectedwomenandfamiliesastudyprotocolforaqualitativerealiststudyinnhsmaternityservicesthediscernstudy AT iedemarick investigationofthecriticalfactorsrequiredtoimprovethedisclosureanddiscussionofharmwithaffectedwomenandfamiliesastudyprotocolforaqualitativerealiststudyinnhsmaternityservicesthediscernstudy AT heazellalexanderedward investigationofthecriticalfactorsrequiredtoimprovethedisclosureanddiscussionofharmwithaffectedwomenandfamiliesastudyprotocolforaqualitativerealiststudyinnhsmaternityservicesthediscernstudy AT treadwellmaureen investigationofthecriticalfactorsrequiredtoimprovethedisclosureanddiscussionofharmwithaffectedwomenandfamiliesastudyprotocolforaqualitativerealiststudyinnhsmaternityservicesthediscernstudy AT bookermaria investigationofthecriticalfactorsrequiredtoimprovethedisclosureanddiscussionofharmwithaffectedwomenandfamiliesastudyprotocolforaqualitativerealiststudyinnhsmaternityservicesthediscernstudy AT bevancharlotte investigationofthecriticalfactorsrequiredtoimprovethedisclosureanddiscussionofharmwithaffectedwomenandfamiliesastudyprotocolforaqualitativerealiststudyinnhsmaternityservicesthediscernstudy AT hartleyjulie investigationofthecriticalfactorsrequiredtoimprovethedisclosureanddiscussionofharmwithaffectedwomenandfamiliesastudyprotocolforaqualitativerealiststudyinnhsmaternityservicesthediscernstudy AT sandalljane investigationofthecriticalfactorsrequiredtoimprovethedisclosureanddiscussionofharmwithaffectedwomenandfamiliesastudyprotocolforaqualitativerealiststudyinnhsmaternityservicesthediscernstudy |