Cargando…

Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To explore a protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting rehabilitation adherence. DESIGN: Analysis of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: An exercise physiology and physiotherapist clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with chronic low back pain (n=40). INTERVENTIONS: General...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owen, Patrick J, Main, Luana C, Miller, Clint T, Ford, Jon J, Hahne, Andrew J, Belavy, Daniel L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35115351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052644
_version_ 1784645131799887872
author Owen, Patrick J
Main, Luana C
Miller, Clint T
Ford, Jon J
Hahne, Andrew J
Belavy, Daniel L
author_facet Owen, Patrick J
Main, Luana C
Miller, Clint T
Ford, Jon J
Hahne, Andrew J
Belavy, Daniel L
author_sort Owen, Patrick J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore a protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting rehabilitation adherence. DESIGN: Analysis of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: An exercise physiology and physiotherapist clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with chronic low back pain (n=40). INTERVENTIONS: General strength and conditioning (GSC) compared with motor control and manual therapy. Primary and secondary outcome measures: predicting patient adherence to supervised sessions and dropout using the Sports Injury Rehabilitation Beliefs Scale, seven-item barriers checklist and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule and Sports Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale. RESULTS: Average attendance was 77% (motor control and manual therapy) and 60% (GSC) with eight dropouts. No Sports Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale values other than 5 across all three components were recorded. Treatment efficacy (p=0.019), self-efficacy (p=0.001), rehabilitation value (p=0.028) and injury severity (p=0.002) positively correlated with susceptibility (the extent of vulnerability to having health problems from not taking action). Rehabilitation value positively correlated with self-efficacy (p=0.005). Injury severity positively correlated with rehabilitation value (p=0.011). The final model for number of cancellations included rehabilitation value only and accounted for approximately 12% of variance (p=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Perceived value of rehabilitation should be considered by clinicians in the rehabilitation setting to improve treatment adherence in patients with chronic low back pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615001270505.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8814751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88147512022-02-16 Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial Owen, Patrick J Main, Luana C Miller, Clint T Ford, Jon J Hahne, Andrew J Belavy, Daniel L BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVE: To explore a protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting rehabilitation adherence. DESIGN: Analysis of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: An exercise physiology and physiotherapist clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with chronic low back pain (n=40). INTERVENTIONS: General strength and conditioning (GSC) compared with motor control and manual therapy. Primary and secondary outcome measures: predicting patient adherence to supervised sessions and dropout using the Sports Injury Rehabilitation Beliefs Scale, seven-item barriers checklist and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule and Sports Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale. RESULTS: Average attendance was 77% (motor control and manual therapy) and 60% (GSC) with eight dropouts. No Sports Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale values other than 5 across all three components were recorded. Treatment efficacy (p=0.019), self-efficacy (p=0.001), rehabilitation value (p=0.028) and injury severity (p=0.002) positively correlated with susceptibility (the extent of vulnerability to having health problems from not taking action). Rehabilitation value positively correlated with self-efficacy (p=0.005). Injury severity positively correlated with rehabilitation value (p=0.011). The final model for number of cancellations included rehabilitation value only and accounted for approximately 12% of variance (p=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Perceived value of rehabilitation should be considered by clinicians in the rehabilitation setting to improve treatment adherence in patients with chronic low back pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615001270505. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8814751/ /pubmed/35115351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052644 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Owen, Patrick J
Main, Luana C
Miller, Clint T
Ford, Jon J
Hahne, Andrew J
Belavy, Daniel L
Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_full Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_short Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_sort protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35115351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052644
work_keys_str_mv AT owenpatrickj protectionmotivationtheoryscreeningtoolforpredictingchroniclowbackpainrehabilitationadherenceanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mainluanac protectionmotivationtheoryscreeningtoolforpredictingchroniclowbackpainrehabilitationadherenceanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT millerclintt protectionmotivationtheoryscreeningtoolforpredictingchroniclowbackpainrehabilitationadherenceanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fordjonj protectionmotivationtheoryscreeningtoolforpredictingchroniclowbackpainrehabilitationadherenceanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hahneandrewj protectionmotivationtheoryscreeningtoolforpredictingchroniclowbackpainrehabilitationadherenceanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT belavydaniell protectionmotivationtheoryscreeningtoolforpredictingchroniclowbackpainrehabilitationadherenceanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial