Cargando…
Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: To explore a protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting rehabilitation adherence. DESIGN: Analysis of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: An exercise physiology and physiotherapist clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with chronic low back pain (n=40). INTERVENTIONS: General...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35115351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052644 |
_version_ | 1784645131799887872 |
---|---|
author | Owen, Patrick J Main, Luana C Miller, Clint T Ford, Jon J Hahne, Andrew J Belavy, Daniel L |
author_facet | Owen, Patrick J Main, Luana C Miller, Clint T Ford, Jon J Hahne, Andrew J Belavy, Daniel L |
author_sort | Owen, Patrick J |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To explore a protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting rehabilitation adherence. DESIGN: Analysis of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: An exercise physiology and physiotherapist clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with chronic low back pain (n=40). INTERVENTIONS: General strength and conditioning (GSC) compared with motor control and manual therapy. Primary and secondary outcome measures: predicting patient adherence to supervised sessions and dropout using the Sports Injury Rehabilitation Beliefs Scale, seven-item barriers checklist and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule and Sports Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale. RESULTS: Average attendance was 77% (motor control and manual therapy) and 60% (GSC) with eight dropouts. No Sports Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale values other than 5 across all three components were recorded. Treatment efficacy (p=0.019), self-efficacy (p=0.001), rehabilitation value (p=0.028) and injury severity (p=0.002) positively correlated with susceptibility (the extent of vulnerability to having health problems from not taking action). Rehabilitation value positively correlated with self-efficacy (p=0.005). Injury severity positively correlated with rehabilitation value (p=0.011). The final model for number of cancellations included rehabilitation value only and accounted for approximately 12% of variance (p=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Perceived value of rehabilitation should be considered by clinicians in the rehabilitation setting to improve treatment adherence in patients with chronic low back pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615001270505. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8814751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88147512022-02-16 Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial Owen, Patrick J Main, Luana C Miller, Clint T Ford, Jon J Hahne, Andrew J Belavy, Daniel L BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVE: To explore a protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting rehabilitation adherence. DESIGN: Analysis of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: An exercise physiology and physiotherapist clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with chronic low back pain (n=40). INTERVENTIONS: General strength and conditioning (GSC) compared with motor control and manual therapy. Primary and secondary outcome measures: predicting patient adherence to supervised sessions and dropout using the Sports Injury Rehabilitation Beliefs Scale, seven-item barriers checklist and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule and Sports Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale. RESULTS: Average attendance was 77% (motor control and manual therapy) and 60% (GSC) with eight dropouts. No Sports Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale values other than 5 across all three components were recorded. Treatment efficacy (p=0.019), self-efficacy (p=0.001), rehabilitation value (p=0.028) and injury severity (p=0.002) positively correlated with susceptibility (the extent of vulnerability to having health problems from not taking action). Rehabilitation value positively correlated with self-efficacy (p=0.005). Injury severity positively correlated with rehabilitation value (p=0.011). The final model for number of cancellations included rehabilitation value only and accounted for approximately 12% of variance (p=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Perceived value of rehabilitation should be considered by clinicians in the rehabilitation setting to improve treatment adherence in patients with chronic low back pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615001270505. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8814751/ /pubmed/35115351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052644 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Owen, Patrick J Main, Luana C Miller, Clint T Ford, Jon J Hahne, Andrew J Belavy, Daniel L Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial |
title | Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35115351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052644 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT owenpatrickj protectionmotivationtheoryscreeningtoolforpredictingchroniclowbackpainrehabilitationadherenceanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mainluanac protectionmotivationtheoryscreeningtoolforpredictingchroniclowbackpainrehabilitationadherenceanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT millerclintt protectionmotivationtheoryscreeningtoolforpredictingchroniclowbackpainrehabilitationadherenceanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fordjonj protectionmotivationtheoryscreeningtoolforpredictingchroniclowbackpainrehabilitationadherenceanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hahneandrewj protectionmotivationtheoryscreeningtoolforpredictingchroniclowbackpainrehabilitationadherenceanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT belavydaniell protectionmotivationtheoryscreeningtoolforpredictingchroniclowbackpainrehabilitationadherenceanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial |