Cargando…

Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatologists: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews by Gender and Years of Experience

Online reviews are the newest method for patients to evaluate their providers. However, insufficient studies focus on the role of inherent physician characteristics, such as gender and years of experience, on patient satisfaction. We analyzed both quantitative and qualitative online reviews of 350 g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trager, Megan H., Queen, Dawn, Fan, Weijia, Samie, Faramarz H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35141698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100089
_version_ 1784645147829469184
author Trager, Megan H.
Queen, Dawn
Fan, Weijia
Samie, Faramarz H.
author_facet Trager, Megan H.
Queen, Dawn
Fan, Weijia
Samie, Faramarz H.
author_sort Trager, Megan H.
collection PubMed
description Online reviews are the newest method for patients to evaluate their providers. However, insufficient studies focus on the role of inherent physician characteristics, such as gender and years of experience, on patient satisfaction. We analyzed both quantitative and qualitative online reviews of 350 general dermatology providers at 121 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited dermatology programs across the country to determine the effect of gender and years of experience. There were 38,008 online reviews of general dermatology providers. There was no significant difference in male and female overall ratings. Ratings were overall equally positive for both genders. Female providers were more likely to have positive written comments regarding time spent with patients (P = 0.027). New providers received highest overall, promptness, and time spent with patient ratings (P < 0.001). Medium experience providers received highest scores in bedside manner (P < 0.001), accurate diagnosis (P = 0.018), and ability to answer questions (P = 0.005). Advanced providers scored the lowest across all categories. In conclusion, gender did not significantly affect ratings, although females received more positive written comments on time spent with patients. Years of experience, however, is a significant factor in patient ratings, with new or medium experience providers scoring higher than advanced providers in every category.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8814819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88148192022-02-08 Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatologists: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews by Gender and Years of Experience Trager, Megan H. Queen, Dawn Fan, Weijia Samie, Faramarz H. JID Innov Original Article Online reviews are the newest method for patients to evaluate their providers. However, insufficient studies focus on the role of inherent physician characteristics, such as gender and years of experience, on patient satisfaction. We analyzed both quantitative and qualitative online reviews of 350 general dermatology providers at 121 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited dermatology programs across the country to determine the effect of gender and years of experience. There were 38,008 online reviews of general dermatology providers. There was no significant difference in male and female overall ratings. Ratings were overall equally positive for both genders. Female providers were more likely to have positive written comments regarding time spent with patients (P = 0.027). New providers received highest overall, promptness, and time spent with patient ratings (P < 0.001). Medium experience providers received highest scores in bedside manner (P < 0.001), accurate diagnosis (P = 0.018), and ability to answer questions (P = 0.005). Advanced providers scored the lowest across all categories. In conclusion, gender did not significantly affect ratings, although females received more positive written comments on time spent with patients. Years of experience, however, is a significant factor in patient ratings, with new or medium experience providers scoring higher than advanced providers in every category. Elsevier 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8814819/ /pubmed/35141698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100089 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Trager, Megan H.
Queen, Dawn
Fan, Weijia
Samie, Faramarz H.
Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatologists: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews by Gender and Years of Experience
title Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatologists: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews by Gender and Years of Experience
title_full Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatologists: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews by Gender and Years of Experience
title_fullStr Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatologists: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews by Gender and Years of Experience
title_full_unstemmed Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatologists: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews by Gender and Years of Experience
title_short Patient Satisfaction of General Dermatologists: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 38,008 Online Reviews by Gender and Years of Experience
title_sort patient satisfaction of general dermatologists: a quantitative and qualitative analysis of 38,008 online reviews by gender and years of experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35141698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100089
work_keys_str_mv AT tragermeganh patientsatisfactionofgeneraldermatologistsaquantitativeandqualitativeanalysisof38008onlinereviewsbygenderandyearsofexperience
AT queendawn patientsatisfactionofgeneraldermatologistsaquantitativeandqualitativeanalysisof38008onlinereviewsbygenderandyearsofexperience
AT fanweijia patientsatisfactionofgeneraldermatologistsaquantitativeandqualitativeanalysisof38008onlinereviewsbygenderandyearsofexperience
AT samiefaramarzh patientsatisfactionofgeneraldermatologistsaquantitativeandqualitativeanalysisof38008onlinereviewsbygenderandyearsofexperience