Cargando…

ARM IMPAIRMENT AND WALKING SPEED EXPLAIN REAL-LIFE ACTIVITY OF THE AFFECTED ARM AND LEG AFTER STROKE

OBJECTIVE: To determine to what extent accelerometer-based arm, leg and trunk activity is associated with sensorimotor impairments, walking capacity and other factors in subacute stroke. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PATIENTS: Twenty-six individuals with stroke (mean age 55.4 years, severe to mild...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ANDERSSON, Sofi A., DANIELSSON, Anna, OHLSSON, Fredrik, WIPENMYR, Jan, ALT MURPHY, Margit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Foundation for Rehabilitation Information 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33948673
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2838
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To determine to what extent accelerometer-based arm, leg and trunk activity is associated with sensorimotor impairments, walking capacity and other factors in subacute stroke. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PATIENTS: Twenty-six individuals with stroke (mean age 55.4 years, severe to mild motor impairment). METHODS: Data on daytime activity were collected over a period of 4 days from accelerometers placed on the wrists, ankles and trunk. A forward stepwise linear regression was used to determine associations between free-living activity, clinical and demographic variables. RESULTS: Arm motor impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment) and walking speed explained more than 60% of the variance in daytime activity of the more-affected arm, while walking speed alone explained 60% of the more-affected leg activity. Activity of the less-affected arm and leg was associated with arm motor impairment (R(2) = 0.40) and independence in walking (R(2) = 0.59). Arm activity ratio was associated with arm impairment (R(2) = 0.63) and leg activity ratio with leg impairment (R(2) = 0.38) and walking speed (R(2) = 0.27). Walking-related variables explained approximately 30% of the variance in trunk activity. CONCLUSION: Accelerometer-based free-living activity is dependent on motor impairment and walking capacity. The most relevant activity data were obtained from more-affected limbs. Motor impairment and walking speed can provide some information about real-life daytime activity levels.