Cargando…

Evaluation of the Quality of Evidence of the Association of Foods and Nutrients With Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE: Poor diet is a leading global factor associated with cardiometabolic disease (CMD). Understanding the quality of evidence of the associations between specific dietary factors and CMD, including effect size (relative risk [RR]) and uncertainty, is essential to guide policy and consumer ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Victoria, Micha, Renata, Choi, Erin, Karageorgou, Dimitra, Webb, Patrick, Mozaffarian, Dariush
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46705
_version_ 1784645174690840576
author Miller, Victoria
Micha, Renata
Choi, Erin
Karageorgou, Dimitra
Webb, Patrick
Mozaffarian, Dariush
author_facet Miller, Victoria
Micha, Renata
Choi, Erin
Karageorgou, Dimitra
Webb, Patrick
Mozaffarian, Dariush
author_sort Miller, Victoria
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Poor diet is a leading global factor associated with cardiometabolic disease (CMD). Understanding the quality of evidence of the associations between specific dietary factors and CMD, including effect size (relative risk [RR]) and uncertainty, is essential to guide policy and consumer actions to achieve healthy diet and public health goals. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of evidence of the associations between specific dietary factors and CMD as well as the quantitative evidence for RRs and the uncertainty of these risk estimates. EVIDENCE REVIEW: PubMed and the reference lists of eligible articles were searched between May 1, 2015, and February 26, 2021, for systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort studies that analyzed the consumption of 1 or more of the dietary factors of interest; reported dose-response meta-analyses; included healthy adults; and assessed 1 or more of the outcomes of interest. Study characteristics and RR estimates were extracted in duplicate. For identified associations, quality of evidence was assessed using the Bradford-Hill criteria for causation. FINDINGS: A total of 2058 potentially relevant reports were identified, from which 285 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. The final selection of articles included 28 meta-analyses representing 62 associations between diet and CMD. Among these associations, 10 foods, 3 beverages, and 12 nutrients had at least probable evidence of associations with coronary heart disease, stroke, and/or diabetes. Most RRs ranged from 0.87 to 0.96 per daily serving change for protective associations and from 1.06 to 1.15 per daily serving change for harmful associations. Most identified associations were protective (n = 38) and a smaller number were harmful (n = 24), with a higher risk associated with higher intake. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This systematic review summarized the current quality of evidence of the associations of specific dietary factors with coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. These findings may inform dietary guidance, the assessment of disease burden in specific populations, policy setting, and future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8814912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88149122022-02-16 Evaluation of the Quality of Evidence of the Association of Foods and Nutrients With Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: A Systematic Review Miller, Victoria Micha, Renata Choi, Erin Karageorgou, Dimitra Webb, Patrick Mozaffarian, Dariush JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Poor diet is a leading global factor associated with cardiometabolic disease (CMD). Understanding the quality of evidence of the associations between specific dietary factors and CMD, including effect size (relative risk [RR]) and uncertainty, is essential to guide policy and consumer actions to achieve healthy diet and public health goals. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of evidence of the associations between specific dietary factors and CMD as well as the quantitative evidence for RRs and the uncertainty of these risk estimates. EVIDENCE REVIEW: PubMed and the reference lists of eligible articles were searched between May 1, 2015, and February 26, 2021, for systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort studies that analyzed the consumption of 1 or more of the dietary factors of interest; reported dose-response meta-analyses; included healthy adults; and assessed 1 or more of the outcomes of interest. Study characteristics and RR estimates were extracted in duplicate. For identified associations, quality of evidence was assessed using the Bradford-Hill criteria for causation. FINDINGS: A total of 2058 potentially relevant reports were identified, from which 285 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. The final selection of articles included 28 meta-analyses representing 62 associations between diet and CMD. Among these associations, 10 foods, 3 beverages, and 12 nutrients had at least probable evidence of associations with coronary heart disease, stroke, and/or diabetes. Most RRs ranged from 0.87 to 0.96 per daily serving change for protective associations and from 1.06 to 1.15 per daily serving change for harmful associations. Most identified associations were protective (n = 38) and a smaller number were harmful (n = 24), with a higher risk associated with higher intake. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This systematic review summarized the current quality of evidence of the associations of specific dietary factors with coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. These findings may inform dietary guidance, the assessment of disease burden in specific populations, policy setting, and future research. American Medical Association 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8814912/ /pubmed/35113165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46705 Text en Copyright 2022 Miller V et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Miller, Victoria
Micha, Renata
Choi, Erin
Karageorgou, Dimitra
Webb, Patrick
Mozaffarian, Dariush
Evaluation of the Quality of Evidence of the Association of Foods and Nutrients With Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: A Systematic Review
title Evaluation of the Quality of Evidence of the Association of Foods and Nutrients With Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: A Systematic Review
title_full Evaluation of the Quality of Evidence of the Association of Foods and Nutrients With Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Quality of Evidence of the Association of Foods and Nutrients With Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Quality of Evidence of the Association of Foods and Nutrients With Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: A Systematic Review
title_short Evaluation of the Quality of Evidence of the Association of Foods and Nutrients With Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: A Systematic Review
title_sort evaluation of the quality of evidence of the association of foods and nutrients with cardiovascular disease and diabetes: a systematic review
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46705
work_keys_str_mv AT millervictoria evaluationofthequalityofevidenceoftheassociationoffoodsandnutrientswithcardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetesasystematicreview
AT micharenata evaluationofthequalityofevidenceoftheassociationoffoodsandnutrientswithcardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetesasystematicreview
AT choierin evaluationofthequalityofevidenceoftheassociationoffoodsandnutrientswithcardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetesasystematicreview
AT karageorgoudimitra evaluationofthequalityofevidenceoftheassociationoffoodsandnutrientswithcardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetesasystematicreview
AT webbpatrick evaluationofthequalityofevidenceoftheassociationoffoodsandnutrientswithcardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetesasystematicreview
AT mozaffariandariush evaluationofthequalityofevidenceoftheassociationoffoodsandnutrientswithcardiovasculardiseaseanddiabetesasystematicreview