Cargando…

Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this meta-analysis was to summarize evidence on the therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on core symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Specifically, findings from studies deploying transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kan, Rebecca L.D., Xu, Grace X.J., Shu, Kate T., Lai, Frank H.Y., Kranz, Gottfried, Kranz, Georg S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223211069198
_version_ 1784645190096519168
author Kan, Rebecca L.D.
Xu, Grace X.J.
Shu, Kate T.
Lai, Frank H.Y.
Kranz, Gottfried
Kranz, Georg S.
author_facet Kan, Rebecca L.D.
Xu, Grace X.J.
Shu, Kate T.
Lai, Frank H.Y.
Kranz, Gottfried
Kranz, Georg S.
author_sort Kan, Rebecca L.D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this meta-analysis was to summarize evidence on the therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on core symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Specifically, findings from studies deploying transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols were summarized in this review. METHODS: We systematically searched articles published in four databases, until 31 May 2021, which compared the effects of active tDCS or rTMS with sham intervention in MS patients. We used a random-effects model for this meta-analysis. Meta-regression and subgroup meta-analysis were used to examine the effects of stimulation dose and different stimulation protocols, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this review, consisting of 19 tDCS and 6 rTMS studies. tDCS led to a significant and immediate reduction of fatigue with a large effect size (Hedges’s g = −0.870, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = [−1.225 to −0.458], number needed to treat (NNT) = 2). Particularly, a subgroup analysis showed that applying tDCS over the left DLPFC and bilateral S1 led to fatigue reductions compared to sham stimulation. Furthermore, tDCS had favorable effects on fatigue in MS patients with low physical disability but not those with high physical disability, and additionally improved cognitive function. Finally, whereas rTMS was observed to reduce muscle spasticity, these NIBS protocols showed no further effect on MS-associated pain and mood symptoms. CONCLUSION: tDCS in MS alleviates fatigue and improves cognitive function whereas rTMS reduces muscle spasticity. More high-quality studies are needed to substantiate the therapeutic effects of different NIBS protocols in MS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8814979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88149792022-02-05 Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis Kan, Rebecca L.D. Xu, Grace X.J. Shu, Kate T. Lai, Frank H.Y. Kranz, Gottfried Kranz, Georg S. Ther Adv Chronic Dis Meta-Analysis OBJECTIVE: The objective of this meta-analysis was to summarize evidence on the therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on core symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Specifically, findings from studies deploying transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols were summarized in this review. METHODS: We systematically searched articles published in four databases, until 31 May 2021, which compared the effects of active tDCS or rTMS with sham intervention in MS patients. We used a random-effects model for this meta-analysis. Meta-regression and subgroup meta-analysis were used to examine the effects of stimulation dose and different stimulation protocols, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this review, consisting of 19 tDCS and 6 rTMS studies. tDCS led to a significant and immediate reduction of fatigue with a large effect size (Hedges’s g = −0.870, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = [−1.225 to −0.458], number needed to treat (NNT) = 2). Particularly, a subgroup analysis showed that applying tDCS over the left DLPFC and bilateral S1 led to fatigue reductions compared to sham stimulation. Furthermore, tDCS had favorable effects on fatigue in MS patients with low physical disability but not those with high physical disability, and additionally improved cognitive function. Finally, whereas rTMS was observed to reduce muscle spasticity, these NIBS protocols showed no further effect on MS-associated pain and mood symptoms. CONCLUSION: tDCS in MS alleviates fatigue and improves cognitive function whereas rTMS reduces muscle spasticity. More high-quality studies are needed to substantiate the therapeutic effects of different NIBS protocols in MS. SAGE Publications 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8814979/ /pubmed/35126965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223211069198 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Kan, Rebecca L.D.
Xu, Grace X.J.
Shu, Kate T.
Lai, Frank H.Y.
Kranz, Gottfried
Kranz, Georg S.
Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223211069198
work_keys_str_mv AT kanrebeccald effectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinmultiplesclerosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xugracexj effectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinmultiplesclerosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shukatet effectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinmultiplesclerosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT laifrankhy effectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinmultiplesclerosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kranzgottfried effectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinmultiplesclerosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kranzgeorgs effectsofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinmultiplesclerosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis