Cargando…
Systematic review and meta-analysis: evaluating response to empiric anti-TNF dose intensification for secondary loss of response in Crohn’s disease
INTRODUCTION: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) dose intensification represents an effective method of overcoming secondary loss of response (LOR); however, a subset of patients may not respond (tertiary non-response), or fail to demonstrate durable response (tertiary LOR) to intensified dosing. This...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848211070940 |
_version_ | 1784645190332448768 |
---|---|
author | Srinivasan, Ashish Gilmore, Robert van Langenberg, Daniel De Cruz, Peter |
author_facet | Srinivasan, Ashish Gilmore, Robert van Langenberg, Daniel De Cruz, Peter |
author_sort | Srinivasan, Ashish |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) dose intensification represents an effective method of overcoming secondary loss of response (LOR); however, a subset of patients may not respond (tertiary non-response), or fail to demonstrate durable response (tertiary LOR) to intensified dosing. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate these outcomes to determine the clinical effectiveness of empiric dose intensification in Crohn’s disease. METHODS: Multiple databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE were interrogated to identify studies that reported outcomes following anti-TNF dose intensification to address secondary LOR in Crohn’s disease. Studies that used anti-TNF levels as the primary basis for dose intensification were excluded. Studies that reported (1) tertiary response and tertiary non-response within 6 months or (2) tertiary response and tertiary LOR beyond 6 months, were pooled using a random effects model with risk ratio (RR) derived, quantifying the effect of each comparison. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies reported outcomes following anti-TNF dose intensification to address secondary LOR. Short-term response within 12 weeks of any dose-intensification strategy was 33–90%, while sustained response (⩾48 weeks) was achieved in 25–85%. Tertiary non-response occurred in up to 45% of intensified patients within 6 months of anti-TNF dose intensification, while tertiary LOR beyond 6 months occurred in up to 64% of patients. Tertiary response was more likely than tertiary non-response within 6 months (RR 2.58, 95% CI (1.76, 3.79), I(2) = 82%, 12 studies), while sustained response beyond 6 months compared to tertiary LOR (RR 1.10 (0.75, 1.61) I(2) = 85%, 7 studies) was less convincing. CONCLUSION: Although anti-TNF dose intensification is clinically effective in patients with Crohn’s disease, particularly within the first 6 months, a proportion of patients will fail to demonstrate short-term and/or sustained clinical response. Hence, clinical reassessment following anti-TNF dose intensification, particularly beyond 6 months, remains important to differentiate between effective and ineffective dose-intensification strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8814980 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88149802022-02-05 Systematic review and meta-analysis: evaluating response to empiric anti-TNF dose intensification for secondary loss of response in Crohn’s disease Srinivasan, Ashish Gilmore, Robert van Langenberg, Daniel De Cruz, Peter Therap Adv Gastroenterol Systematic Review INTRODUCTION: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) dose intensification represents an effective method of overcoming secondary loss of response (LOR); however, a subset of patients may not respond (tertiary non-response), or fail to demonstrate durable response (tertiary LOR) to intensified dosing. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate these outcomes to determine the clinical effectiveness of empiric dose intensification in Crohn’s disease. METHODS: Multiple databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE were interrogated to identify studies that reported outcomes following anti-TNF dose intensification to address secondary LOR in Crohn’s disease. Studies that used anti-TNF levels as the primary basis for dose intensification were excluded. Studies that reported (1) tertiary response and tertiary non-response within 6 months or (2) tertiary response and tertiary LOR beyond 6 months, were pooled using a random effects model with risk ratio (RR) derived, quantifying the effect of each comparison. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies reported outcomes following anti-TNF dose intensification to address secondary LOR. Short-term response within 12 weeks of any dose-intensification strategy was 33–90%, while sustained response (⩾48 weeks) was achieved in 25–85%. Tertiary non-response occurred in up to 45% of intensified patients within 6 months of anti-TNF dose intensification, while tertiary LOR beyond 6 months occurred in up to 64% of patients. Tertiary response was more likely than tertiary non-response within 6 months (RR 2.58, 95% CI (1.76, 3.79), I(2) = 82%, 12 studies), while sustained response beyond 6 months compared to tertiary LOR (RR 1.10 (0.75, 1.61) I(2) = 85%, 7 studies) was less convincing. CONCLUSION: Although anti-TNF dose intensification is clinically effective in patients with Crohn’s disease, particularly within the first 6 months, a proportion of patients will fail to demonstrate short-term and/or sustained clinical response. Hence, clinical reassessment following anti-TNF dose intensification, particularly beyond 6 months, remains important to differentiate between effective and ineffective dose-intensification strategies. SAGE Publications 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8814980/ /pubmed/35126667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848211070940 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Srinivasan, Ashish Gilmore, Robert van Langenberg, Daniel De Cruz, Peter Systematic review and meta-analysis: evaluating response to empiric anti-TNF dose intensification for secondary loss of response in Crohn’s disease |
title | Systematic review and meta-analysis: evaluating response to empiric anti-TNF dose intensification for secondary loss of response in Crohn’s disease |
title_full | Systematic review and meta-analysis: evaluating response to empiric anti-TNF dose intensification for secondary loss of response in Crohn’s disease |
title_fullStr | Systematic review and meta-analysis: evaluating response to empiric anti-TNF dose intensification for secondary loss of response in Crohn’s disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review and meta-analysis: evaluating response to empiric anti-TNF dose intensification for secondary loss of response in Crohn’s disease |
title_short | Systematic review and meta-analysis: evaluating response to empiric anti-TNF dose intensification for secondary loss of response in Crohn’s disease |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis: evaluating response to empiric anti-tnf dose intensification for secondary loss of response in crohn’s disease |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848211070940 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT srinivasanashish systematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingresponsetoempiricantitnfdoseintensificationforsecondarylossofresponseincrohnsdisease AT gilmorerobert systematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingresponsetoempiricantitnfdoseintensificationforsecondarylossofresponseincrohnsdisease AT vanlangenbergdaniel systematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingresponsetoempiricantitnfdoseintensificationforsecondarylossofresponseincrohnsdisease AT decruzpeter systematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingresponsetoempiricantitnfdoseintensificationforsecondarylossofresponseincrohnsdisease |