Cargando…

Analysis of Return to Play After Modified Broström Lateral Ankle Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Despite marked improvements in stability after lateral ankle ligament repair, many patients do not return to their preinjury activity level. There are few studies addressing athletes’ assessment of their ability to return to play after lateral ankle ligament reconstruction for recurrent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: May, Nolan R., Driscoll, Matthew, Nguyen, Shawn, Ferkel, Richard D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211068541
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Despite marked improvements in stability after lateral ankle ligament repair, many patients do not return to their preinjury activity level. There are few studies addressing athletes’ assessment of their ability to return to play after lateral ankle ligament reconstruction for recurrent instability. PURPOSE: To determine the rate of return to the preinjury activity level among physically active patients after the modified Broström procedure (MBP) for recurrent lateral ankle instability. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Included were patients who had undergone a primary MBP by a single surgeon over a 6-year period and had a minimum 24 months of follow-up. A telephone questionnaire was conducted to ascertain the patient’s ability to return to sport and/or work activity at final follow-up. Activity levels were evaluated utilizing the Tegner activity score. Outcome scores and other measured variables were compared between patients who returned to their preinjury level and those who did not. The reasons for failing to return were also documented. RESULTS: Of the 59 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 41 (69%; 20 men and 21 women) participated in the telephone interview. Results indicated that 22 (54%) returned to their prior level of activity (returners). The mean age of returners was 27.2 years; for nonreturners, the mean age was 27.1 years. Most patients (36/41; 88%) were satisfied with surgery and the overall outcome. Of the 19 nonreturners, 7 (37%) noted ankle-related reasons for not returning (pain: 57%; residual instability: 29%; decreased range of motion: 14%), and 12 (63%) cited non–ankle-related reasons. The mean preinjury and postoperative Tegner score for returners was 6.8. Moreover, 7 of 14 (50%) high-level athletes with preinjury Tegner scores ≥8 returned to their preinjury activity level. For high-level athletes who did not return to their previous level, the mean postoperative Tegner score was 6.6, and only 1 (7%) cited an ankle-related reason for not returning. CONCLUSION: A high patient satisfaction rate was reported after the MBP for recurrent lateral ankle instability. The majority of patients who did not return to their preinjury level cited a non–ankle-related factor as the reason for not returning to sport. This was especially true for the higher level athletes.