Cargando…

Validity and reliability of the spiritual care competency scale for oncology nurses in Taiwan

BACKGROUND: Nurses must have spiritual competence to provide holistic patient care. Therefore, the designed instrument to assess nurses’ competence could be a practical guide for health care professionals. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the spiritual care competency sca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fang, Hui-Fen, Susanti, Henny Dwi, Dlamini, Lindelwa Portia, Miao, Nae-Fang, Chung, Min-Huey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8815162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35114991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-00903-w
_version_ 1784645226235691008
author Fang, Hui-Fen
Susanti, Henny Dwi
Dlamini, Lindelwa Portia
Miao, Nae-Fang
Chung, Min-Huey
author_facet Fang, Hui-Fen
Susanti, Henny Dwi
Dlamini, Lindelwa Portia
Miao, Nae-Fang
Chung, Min-Huey
author_sort Fang, Hui-Fen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nurses must have spiritual competence to provide holistic patient care. Therefore, the designed instrument to assess nurses’ competence could be a practical guide for health care professionals. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the spiritual care competency scale (SCCS) for oncology nurses in Taiwan. METHODS: This study used a convenience sample from a regional teaching hospital in Taiwan from November 2017 to February 2019, who were asked to complete the SCCS. We employed scale-content validity index (S-CVI). Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was also used to evaluate the structural factor of SCCS. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) verified the construct validity of SCCS scale for oncology nurses in Taiwan. Test–retest reliability were also measured in this study at 2-week interval. RESULTS: The average S-CVI of SCCS was 0.96. The EFA produced four factors of 27 items, such as professionalization, improving the quality of spiritual care, personal support, patient counseling and referral, attitude towards patient spirituality and communication, assessment, implementation providing and evaluation of spiritual care. Fitting the 27 items yielded an acceptable model fit; X(2)/df = 2.41, RMSEA = 0.08, GFI = 0.80, AGFI = 0.80, CFI = 0.92, IFI = 0.92, NFI = 0.90, RFI = 0.90, TLI = 0.91, SRMR = 0.06. Cronbach’s alpha values were between 0.93 and 0.95, and the total Cronbach’s alpha was 0.96. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) scores were between 0.43 and 0.88. CONCLUSIONS: The result of this study demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability for the SCCS in the nursing field in Taiwan. Implications for practice in this study serves as a reference for effectively evaluating nursing competency in spiritual care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8815162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88151622022-02-07 Validity and reliability of the spiritual care competency scale for oncology nurses in Taiwan Fang, Hui-Fen Susanti, Henny Dwi Dlamini, Lindelwa Portia Miao, Nae-Fang Chung, Min-Huey BMC Palliat Care Research BACKGROUND: Nurses must have spiritual competence to provide holistic patient care. Therefore, the designed instrument to assess nurses’ competence could be a practical guide for health care professionals. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the spiritual care competency scale (SCCS) for oncology nurses in Taiwan. METHODS: This study used a convenience sample from a regional teaching hospital in Taiwan from November 2017 to February 2019, who were asked to complete the SCCS. We employed scale-content validity index (S-CVI). Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was also used to evaluate the structural factor of SCCS. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) verified the construct validity of SCCS scale for oncology nurses in Taiwan. Test–retest reliability were also measured in this study at 2-week interval. RESULTS: The average S-CVI of SCCS was 0.96. The EFA produced four factors of 27 items, such as professionalization, improving the quality of spiritual care, personal support, patient counseling and referral, attitude towards patient spirituality and communication, assessment, implementation providing and evaluation of spiritual care. Fitting the 27 items yielded an acceptable model fit; X(2)/df = 2.41, RMSEA = 0.08, GFI = 0.80, AGFI = 0.80, CFI = 0.92, IFI = 0.92, NFI = 0.90, RFI = 0.90, TLI = 0.91, SRMR = 0.06. Cronbach’s alpha values were between 0.93 and 0.95, and the total Cronbach’s alpha was 0.96. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) scores were between 0.43 and 0.88. CONCLUSIONS: The result of this study demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability for the SCCS in the nursing field in Taiwan. Implications for practice in this study serves as a reference for effectively evaluating nursing competency in spiritual care. BioMed Central 2022-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8815162/ /pubmed/35114991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-00903-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fang, Hui-Fen
Susanti, Henny Dwi
Dlamini, Lindelwa Portia
Miao, Nae-Fang
Chung, Min-Huey
Validity and reliability of the spiritual care competency scale for oncology nurses in Taiwan
title Validity and reliability of the spiritual care competency scale for oncology nurses in Taiwan
title_full Validity and reliability of the spiritual care competency scale for oncology nurses in Taiwan
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the spiritual care competency scale for oncology nurses in Taiwan
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the spiritual care competency scale for oncology nurses in Taiwan
title_short Validity and reliability of the spiritual care competency scale for oncology nurses in Taiwan
title_sort validity and reliability of the spiritual care competency scale for oncology nurses in taiwan
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8815162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35114991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-00903-w
work_keys_str_mv AT fanghuifen validityandreliabilityofthespiritualcarecompetencyscaleforoncologynursesintaiwan
AT susantihennydwi validityandreliabilityofthespiritualcarecompetencyscaleforoncologynursesintaiwan
AT dlaminilindelwaportia validityandreliabilityofthespiritualcarecompetencyscaleforoncologynursesintaiwan
AT miaonaefang validityandreliabilityofthespiritualcarecompetencyscaleforoncologynursesintaiwan
AT chungminhuey validityandreliabilityofthespiritualcarecompetencyscaleforoncologynursesintaiwan