Cargando…
Comparison of mixed model based approaches for correcting for population substructure with application to extreme phenotype sampling
BACKGROUND: Mixed models are used to correct for confounding due to population stratification and hidden relatedness in genome-wide association studies. This class of models includes linear mixed models and generalized linear mixed models. Existing mixed model approaches to correct for population su...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8815214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35120458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08297-y |
_version_ | 1784645236779122688 |
---|---|
author | Onifade, Maryam Roy-Gagnon, Marie-Hélène Parent, Marie-Élise Burkett, Kelly M. |
author_facet | Onifade, Maryam Roy-Gagnon, Marie-Hélène Parent, Marie-Élise Burkett, Kelly M. |
author_sort | Onifade, Maryam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mixed models are used to correct for confounding due to population stratification and hidden relatedness in genome-wide association studies. This class of models includes linear mixed models and generalized linear mixed models. Existing mixed model approaches to correct for population substructure have been previously investigated with both continuous and case-control response variables. However, they have not been investigated in the context of extreme phenotype sampling (EPS), where genetic covariates are only collected on samples having extreme response variable values. In this work, we compare the performance of existing binary trait mixed model approaches (GMMAT, LEAP and CARAT) on EPS data. Since linear mixed models are commonly used even with binary traits, we also evaluate the performance of a popular linear mixed model implementation (GEMMA). RESULTS: We used simulation studies to estimate the type I error rate and power of all approaches assuming a population with substructure. Our simulation results show that for a common candidate variant, both LEAP and GMMAT control the type I error rate while CARAT’s rate remains inflated. We applied all methods to a real dataset from a Québec, Canada, case-control study that is known to have population substructure. We observe similar type I error control with the analysis on the Québec dataset. For rare variants, the false positive rate remains inflated even after correction with mixed model approaches. For methods that control the type I error rate, the estimated power is comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The methods compared in this study differ in their type I error control. Therefore, when data are from an EPS study, care should be taken to ensure that the models underlying the methodology are suitable to the sampling strategy and to the minor allele frequency of the candidate SNPs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12864-022-08297-y). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8815214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88152142022-02-07 Comparison of mixed model based approaches for correcting for population substructure with application to extreme phenotype sampling Onifade, Maryam Roy-Gagnon, Marie-Hélène Parent, Marie-Élise Burkett, Kelly M. BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Mixed models are used to correct for confounding due to population stratification and hidden relatedness in genome-wide association studies. This class of models includes linear mixed models and generalized linear mixed models. Existing mixed model approaches to correct for population substructure have been previously investigated with both continuous and case-control response variables. However, they have not been investigated in the context of extreme phenotype sampling (EPS), where genetic covariates are only collected on samples having extreme response variable values. In this work, we compare the performance of existing binary trait mixed model approaches (GMMAT, LEAP and CARAT) on EPS data. Since linear mixed models are commonly used even with binary traits, we also evaluate the performance of a popular linear mixed model implementation (GEMMA). RESULTS: We used simulation studies to estimate the type I error rate and power of all approaches assuming a population with substructure. Our simulation results show that for a common candidate variant, both LEAP and GMMAT control the type I error rate while CARAT’s rate remains inflated. We applied all methods to a real dataset from a Québec, Canada, case-control study that is known to have population substructure. We observe similar type I error control with the analysis on the Québec dataset. For rare variants, the false positive rate remains inflated even after correction with mixed model approaches. For methods that control the type I error rate, the estimated power is comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The methods compared in this study differ in their type I error control. Therefore, when data are from an EPS study, care should be taken to ensure that the models underlying the methodology are suitable to the sampling strategy and to the minor allele frequency of the candidate SNPs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12864-022-08297-y). BioMed Central 2022-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8815214/ /pubmed/35120458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08297-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Onifade, Maryam Roy-Gagnon, Marie-Hélène Parent, Marie-Élise Burkett, Kelly M. Comparison of mixed model based approaches for correcting for population substructure with application to extreme phenotype sampling |
title | Comparison of mixed model based approaches for correcting for population substructure with application to extreme phenotype sampling |
title_full | Comparison of mixed model based approaches for correcting for population substructure with application to extreme phenotype sampling |
title_fullStr | Comparison of mixed model based approaches for correcting for population substructure with application to extreme phenotype sampling |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of mixed model based approaches for correcting for population substructure with application to extreme phenotype sampling |
title_short | Comparison of mixed model based approaches for correcting for population substructure with application to extreme phenotype sampling |
title_sort | comparison of mixed model based approaches for correcting for population substructure with application to extreme phenotype sampling |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8815214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35120458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08297-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT onifademaryam comparisonofmixedmodelbasedapproachesforcorrectingforpopulationsubstructurewithapplicationtoextremephenotypesampling AT roygagnonmariehelene comparisonofmixedmodelbasedapproachesforcorrectingforpopulationsubstructurewithapplicationtoextremephenotypesampling AT parentmarieelise comparisonofmixedmodelbasedapproachesforcorrectingforpopulationsubstructurewithapplicationtoextremephenotypesampling AT burkettkellym comparisonofmixedmodelbasedapproachesforcorrectingforpopulationsubstructurewithapplicationtoextremephenotypesampling |