Cargando…

Effect of an osteoporotic fracture prevention program on fracture incidence in routine care: a cluster-randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Fractures are a major health problem in aging societies. Preventive approaches combining bone health and fall prevention are rare. The osteoporotic fracture prevention program in rural areas (OFRA) is a health care fund-driven program for older people in randomly selected districts in Ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rapp, Kilian, Lamb, Sarah E., Roigk, Patrick, Becker, Clemens, Konnopka, Claudia, König, Hans-Helmut, Peter, Raphael S., Rothenbacher, Dietrich, Büchele, Gisela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8815238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35114993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02226-8
_version_ 1784645241825918976
author Rapp, Kilian
Lamb, Sarah E.
Roigk, Patrick
Becker, Clemens
Konnopka, Claudia
König, Hans-Helmut
Peter, Raphael S.
Rothenbacher, Dietrich
Büchele, Gisela
author_facet Rapp, Kilian
Lamb, Sarah E.
Roigk, Patrick
Becker, Clemens
Konnopka, Claudia
König, Hans-Helmut
Peter, Raphael S.
Rothenbacher, Dietrich
Büchele, Gisela
author_sort Rapp, Kilian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fractures are a major health problem in aging societies. Preventive approaches combining bone health and fall prevention are rare. The osteoporotic fracture prevention program in rural areas (OFRA) is a health care fund-driven program for older people in randomly selected districts in Germany. The components of the program were falls prevention exercise classes, examination of bone health by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan, and a consultation about “safety in the living environment.” The aim of this study was to evaluate this complex preventive intervention in a routine health care setting. METHODS: This cluster-randomized trial was performed from October 2015 to October 2018 and took place in 186 administrative districts in five federal states, 47 districts served as intervention districts, and 139, as controls. Within these districts, we included (a) all community-living women and men aged 70–85 years with prior fragility fractures and (b) all community-living women aged 75–80 years. The analysis used routine data collected by a health insurance company. The primary endpoint was all fragility fractures combined. Fracture types, mortality, and nursing home admission were explorative endpoints. Cox frailty models were used for comparative analyses with a median follow-up time of 365 days (interquartile range: 0 days). RESULTS: Nine thousand four hundred eight individuals were approached to participate in one of the program components, 27,318 individuals served as controls. The mean age was 78.7 years. Of those approached to participate, nearly 30% joined the exercise classes. DXA measurement was reimbursed for 13.6%, and 51.8% received advice about measures to increase “safety in the living environment.” The incidence of fragility fractures did not differ between the intervention and the control group (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.80–1.11). However, femoral fractures, the most frequent fracture type, were reduced in the intervention group (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59–0.99). Mortality and nursing home admission did not differ between the intervention and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive fracture prevention program for older people living in rural areas was implemented. The program did not affect the primary endpoint of all fragility fractures combined. It has to be considered that we used a modified intention to treat approach based on geographic randomization and information about endpoints relied exclusively on routine data of the health care insurance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS-ID: 00009000 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-021-02226-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8815238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88152382022-02-07 Effect of an osteoporotic fracture prevention program on fracture incidence in routine care: a cluster-randomized trial Rapp, Kilian Lamb, Sarah E. Roigk, Patrick Becker, Clemens Konnopka, Claudia König, Hans-Helmut Peter, Raphael S. Rothenbacher, Dietrich Büchele, Gisela BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Fractures are a major health problem in aging societies. Preventive approaches combining bone health and fall prevention are rare. The osteoporotic fracture prevention program in rural areas (OFRA) is a health care fund-driven program for older people in randomly selected districts in Germany. The components of the program were falls prevention exercise classes, examination of bone health by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan, and a consultation about “safety in the living environment.” The aim of this study was to evaluate this complex preventive intervention in a routine health care setting. METHODS: This cluster-randomized trial was performed from October 2015 to October 2018 and took place in 186 administrative districts in five federal states, 47 districts served as intervention districts, and 139, as controls. Within these districts, we included (a) all community-living women and men aged 70–85 years with prior fragility fractures and (b) all community-living women aged 75–80 years. The analysis used routine data collected by a health insurance company. The primary endpoint was all fragility fractures combined. Fracture types, mortality, and nursing home admission were explorative endpoints. Cox frailty models were used for comparative analyses with a median follow-up time of 365 days (interquartile range: 0 days). RESULTS: Nine thousand four hundred eight individuals were approached to participate in one of the program components, 27,318 individuals served as controls. The mean age was 78.7 years. Of those approached to participate, nearly 30% joined the exercise classes. DXA measurement was reimbursed for 13.6%, and 51.8% received advice about measures to increase “safety in the living environment.” The incidence of fragility fractures did not differ between the intervention and the control group (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.80–1.11). However, femoral fractures, the most frequent fracture type, were reduced in the intervention group (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59–0.99). Mortality and nursing home admission did not differ between the intervention and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive fracture prevention program for older people living in rural areas was implemented. The program did not affect the primary endpoint of all fragility fractures combined. It has to be considered that we used a modified intention to treat approach based on geographic randomization and information about endpoints relied exclusively on routine data of the health care insurance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS-ID: 00009000 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-021-02226-8. BioMed Central 2022-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8815238/ /pubmed/35114993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02226-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rapp, Kilian
Lamb, Sarah E.
Roigk, Patrick
Becker, Clemens
Konnopka, Claudia
König, Hans-Helmut
Peter, Raphael S.
Rothenbacher, Dietrich
Büchele, Gisela
Effect of an osteoporotic fracture prevention program on fracture incidence in routine care: a cluster-randomized trial
title Effect of an osteoporotic fracture prevention program on fracture incidence in routine care: a cluster-randomized trial
title_full Effect of an osteoporotic fracture prevention program on fracture incidence in routine care: a cluster-randomized trial
title_fullStr Effect of an osteoporotic fracture prevention program on fracture incidence in routine care: a cluster-randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of an osteoporotic fracture prevention program on fracture incidence in routine care: a cluster-randomized trial
title_short Effect of an osteoporotic fracture prevention program on fracture incidence in routine care: a cluster-randomized trial
title_sort effect of an osteoporotic fracture prevention program on fracture incidence in routine care: a cluster-randomized trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8815238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35114993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02226-8
work_keys_str_mv AT rappkilian effectofanosteoporoticfracturepreventionprogramonfractureincidenceinroutinecareaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT lambsarahe effectofanosteoporoticfracturepreventionprogramonfractureincidenceinroutinecareaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT roigkpatrick effectofanosteoporoticfracturepreventionprogramonfractureincidenceinroutinecareaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT beckerclemens effectofanosteoporoticfracturepreventionprogramonfractureincidenceinroutinecareaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT konnopkaclaudia effectofanosteoporoticfracturepreventionprogramonfractureincidenceinroutinecareaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT konighanshelmut effectofanosteoporoticfracturepreventionprogramonfractureincidenceinroutinecareaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT peterraphaels effectofanosteoporoticfracturepreventionprogramonfractureincidenceinroutinecareaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT rothenbacherdietrich effectofanosteoporoticfracturepreventionprogramonfractureincidenceinroutinecareaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT buchelegisela effectofanosteoporoticfracturepreventionprogramonfractureincidenceinroutinecareaclusterrandomizedtrial