Cargando…
The critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials published in an Indian journal to assess the quality of reporting: A retrospective, cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the highest levels of evidence, they might not necessarily be of good quality. Hence, RCTs should always be appraised critically. Critical appraisal is the corroboration of evidence by methodically studying its validity, reliability, and a...
Autores principales: | Gupta, Sandeep Kumar, Tiwari, Ravi Kant, Goel, Raj Kumar |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8815670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35198426 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_169_19 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study to critically appraise the quality of reporting of health economic evaluations conducted in the Indian setting
por: Gupta, Sandeep Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
A study to assess the methodological quality of in vivo animal experiments published in Indian journal of pharmacology: A retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study
por: Gupta, Sandeep Kumar
Publicado: (2019) -
Why should you publish in the Indian Journal of Ophthalmology?
por: Nayak, Barun Kumar
Publicado: (2008) -
The assessment of the quality of randomized controlled trials published in Indian medical journals
por: Goenka, Luxitaa, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Critical appraisal of published literature
por: Umesh, Goneppanavar, et al.
Publicado: (2016)