Cargando…
Pore structure controls stability and molecular flux in engineered protein cages
Protein cages are a common architectural motif used by living organisms to compartmentalize and control biochemical reactions. While engineered protein cages have featured in the construction of nanoreactors and synthetic organelles, relatively little is known about the underlying molecular paramete...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for the Advancement of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8816334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35119930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl7346 |
_version_ | 1784645430236151808 |
---|---|
author | Adamson, Lachlan S. R. Tasneem, Nuren Andreas, Michael P. Close, William Jenner, Eric N. Szyszka, Taylor N. Young, Reginald Cheah, Li Chen Norman, Alexander MacDermott-Opeskin, Hugo I. O’Mara, Megan L. Sainsbury, Frank Giessen, Tobias W. Lau, Yu Heng |
author_facet | Adamson, Lachlan S. R. Tasneem, Nuren Andreas, Michael P. Close, William Jenner, Eric N. Szyszka, Taylor N. Young, Reginald Cheah, Li Chen Norman, Alexander MacDermott-Opeskin, Hugo I. O’Mara, Megan L. Sainsbury, Frank Giessen, Tobias W. Lau, Yu Heng |
author_sort | Adamson, Lachlan S. R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Protein cages are a common architectural motif used by living organisms to compartmentalize and control biochemical reactions. While engineered protein cages have featured in the construction of nanoreactors and synthetic organelles, relatively little is known about the underlying molecular parameters that govern stability and flux through their pores. In this work, we systematically designed 24 variants of the Thermotoga maritima encapsulin cage, featuring pores of different sizes and charges. Twelve pore variants were successfully assembled and purified, including eight designs with exceptional thermal stability. While negatively charged mutations were better tolerated, we were able to form stable assemblies covering a full range of pore sizes and charges, as observed in seven new cryo-EM structures at 2.5- to 3.6-Å resolution. Molecular dynamics simulations and stopped-flow experiments revealed the importance of considering both pore size and charge, together with flexibility and rate-determining steps, when designing protein cages for controlling molecular flux. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8816334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Association for the Advancement of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88163342022-02-16 Pore structure controls stability and molecular flux in engineered protein cages Adamson, Lachlan S. R. Tasneem, Nuren Andreas, Michael P. Close, William Jenner, Eric N. Szyszka, Taylor N. Young, Reginald Cheah, Li Chen Norman, Alexander MacDermott-Opeskin, Hugo I. O’Mara, Megan L. Sainsbury, Frank Giessen, Tobias W. Lau, Yu Heng Sci Adv Biomedicine and Life Sciences Protein cages are a common architectural motif used by living organisms to compartmentalize and control biochemical reactions. While engineered protein cages have featured in the construction of nanoreactors and synthetic organelles, relatively little is known about the underlying molecular parameters that govern stability and flux through their pores. In this work, we systematically designed 24 variants of the Thermotoga maritima encapsulin cage, featuring pores of different sizes and charges. Twelve pore variants were successfully assembled and purified, including eight designs with exceptional thermal stability. While negatively charged mutations were better tolerated, we were able to form stable assemblies covering a full range of pore sizes and charges, as observed in seven new cryo-EM structures at 2.5- to 3.6-Å resolution. Molecular dynamics simulations and stopped-flow experiments revealed the importance of considering both pore size and charge, together with flexibility and rate-determining steps, when designing protein cages for controlling molecular flux. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2022-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8816334/ /pubmed/35119930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl7346 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Biomedicine and Life Sciences Adamson, Lachlan S. R. Tasneem, Nuren Andreas, Michael P. Close, William Jenner, Eric N. Szyszka, Taylor N. Young, Reginald Cheah, Li Chen Norman, Alexander MacDermott-Opeskin, Hugo I. O’Mara, Megan L. Sainsbury, Frank Giessen, Tobias W. Lau, Yu Heng Pore structure controls stability and molecular flux in engineered protein cages |
title | Pore structure controls stability and molecular flux in engineered protein cages |
title_full | Pore structure controls stability and molecular flux in engineered protein cages |
title_fullStr | Pore structure controls stability and molecular flux in engineered protein cages |
title_full_unstemmed | Pore structure controls stability and molecular flux in engineered protein cages |
title_short | Pore structure controls stability and molecular flux in engineered protein cages |
title_sort | pore structure controls stability and molecular flux in engineered protein cages |
topic | Biomedicine and Life Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8816334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35119930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl7346 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adamsonlachlansr porestructurecontrolsstabilityandmolecularfluxinengineeredproteincages AT tasneemnuren porestructurecontrolsstabilityandmolecularfluxinengineeredproteincages AT andreasmichaelp porestructurecontrolsstabilityandmolecularfluxinengineeredproteincages AT closewilliam porestructurecontrolsstabilityandmolecularfluxinengineeredproteincages AT jennerericn porestructurecontrolsstabilityandmolecularfluxinengineeredproteincages AT szyszkataylorn porestructurecontrolsstabilityandmolecularfluxinengineeredproteincages AT youngreginald porestructurecontrolsstabilityandmolecularfluxinengineeredproteincages AT cheahlichen porestructurecontrolsstabilityandmolecularfluxinengineeredproteincages AT normanalexander porestructurecontrolsstabilityandmolecularfluxinengineeredproteincages AT macdermottopeskinhugoi porestructurecontrolsstabilityandmolecularfluxinengineeredproteincages AT omarameganl porestructurecontrolsstabilityandmolecularfluxinengineeredproteincages AT sainsburyfrank porestructurecontrolsstabilityandmolecularfluxinengineeredproteincages AT giessentobiasw porestructurecontrolsstabilityandmolecularfluxinengineeredproteincages AT lauyuheng porestructurecontrolsstabilityandmolecularfluxinengineeredproteincages |