Cargando…

Prospective clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic partial crowns—5-year results

OBJECTIVES: A university-based randomized clinical study evaluated the 5-year performance of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS)-ceramic partial crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-five patients were restored with 61 chairside-fabricated ZLS-restorations (Cerec SW 4.2, De...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rinke, Sven, Zuck, Tanja, Hausdörfer, Tim, Leha, Andreas, Wassmann, Torsten, Ziebolz, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8816527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34415434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04132-y
_version_ 1784645454879784960
author Rinke, Sven
Zuck, Tanja
Hausdörfer, Tim
Leha, Andreas
Wassmann, Torsten
Ziebolz, Dirk
author_facet Rinke, Sven
Zuck, Tanja
Hausdörfer, Tim
Leha, Andreas
Wassmann, Torsten
Ziebolz, Dirk
author_sort Rinke, Sven
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: A university-based randomized clinical study evaluated the 5-year performance of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS)-ceramic partial crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-five patients were restored with 61 chairside-fabricated ZLS-restorations (Cerec SW 4.2, Dentsply Sirona, Germany; Vita Suprinity, Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany). Deviating from the manufacturers’ recommendations, restorations with reduced minimum material thicknesses (MMT) were fabricated: group 1, MMT = 0.5–0.74 mm (n = 31); group 2, MMT = 0.75–1.0 mm (n = 30). For luting, a self-adhesive cement (SAC) or a total-etch technique with a composite cement (TEC) was applied. Statistical evaluation was performed by time-to-event analysis (Kaplan–Meier). Possible covariates of the survival (SVR) and success rates (SCR), evaluated in a Cox regression model, were MMT, restoration position (premolar/molar), and cementation technique (SAC vs. TEC). RESULTS: Forty patients (54 restorations, premolars, n = 23; molars, n = 31) participated in the 5-year follow-up. Five losses due to ceramic fractures occurred in group 1 (n = 28) (SVR: 83.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71–0.96]). Group 2 (n = 26) showed no losses (SVR: 100%). The success rate for partial crowns placed on premolars was 100% and 69% (95% CI: 0.54–0.84) for molar restorations. Recementation was required in 4 restorations with SAC (SCR: 86% [95% CI: 0.73–0.99]; SCR-DC: 100%). Restorations in group 2 showed a significantly reduced risk of material fracture hazard ratio (HR) = 0.09, p = 0.0292) compared with the restorations in group 1. Molar partial crowns showed an increased risk for a clinical intervention (HR = 5.26, p = 0.0222) compared to premolar restorations. CONCLUSIONS: Material thickness and position of the restoration are risk factors influencing the survival and success rate of ZLS-ceramic partial crowns. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Observation of an MMT of at least 0.75–1.0 mm for ZLS-ceramics is essential to avoid material-related fractures. Clinical trial registration: German Clinical Trails Register (trial number: DRKS00005611)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8816527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88165272022-02-17 Prospective clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic partial crowns—5-year results Rinke, Sven Zuck, Tanja Hausdörfer, Tim Leha, Andreas Wassmann, Torsten Ziebolz, Dirk Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: A university-based randomized clinical study evaluated the 5-year performance of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS)-ceramic partial crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-five patients were restored with 61 chairside-fabricated ZLS-restorations (Cerec SW 4.2, Dentsply Sirona, Germany; Vita Suprinity, Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany). Deviating from the manufacturers’ recommendations, restorations with reduced minimum material thicknesses (MMT) were fabricated: group 1, MMT = 0.5–0.74 mm (n = 31); group 2, MMT = 0.75–1.0 mm (n = 30). For luting, a self-adhesive cement (SAC) or a total-etch technique with a composite cement (TEC) was applied. Statistical evaluation was performed by time-to-event analysis (Kaplan–Meier). Possible covariates of the survival (SVR) and success rates (SCR), evaluated in a Cox regression model, were MMT, restoration position (premolar/molar), and cementation technique (SAC vs. TEC). RESULTS: Forty patients (54 restorations, premolars, n = 23; molars, n = 31) participated in the 5-year follow-up. Five losses due to ceramic fractures occurred in group 1 (n = 28) (SVR: 83.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71–0.96]). Group 2 (n = 26) showed no losses (SVR: 100%). The success rate for partial crowns placed on premolars was 100% and 69% (95% CI: 0.54–0.84) for molar restorations. Recementation was required in 4 restorations with SAC (SCR: 86% [95% CI: 0.73–0.99]; SCR-DC: 100%). Restorations in group 2 showed a significantly reduced risk of material fracture hazard ratio (HR) = 0.09, p = 0.0292) compared with the restorations in group 1. Molar partial crowns showed an increased risk for a clinical intervention (HR = 5.26, p = 0.0222) compared to premolar restorations. CONCLUSIONS: Material thickness and position of the restoration are risk factors influencing the survival and success rate of ZLS-ceramic partial crowns. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Observation of an MMT of at least 0.75–1.0 mm for ZLS-ceramics is essential to avoid material-related fractures. Clinical trial registration: German Clinical Trails Register (trial number: DRKS00005611) Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8816527/ /pubmed/34415434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04132-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Rinke, Sven
Zuck, Tanja
Hausdörfer, Tim
Leha, Andreas
Wassmann, Torsten
Ziebolz, Dirk
Prospective clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic partial crowns—5-year results
title Prospective clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic partial crowns—5-year results
title_full Prospective clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic partial crowns—5-year results
title_fullStr Prospective clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic partial crowns—5-year results
title_full_unstemmed Prospective clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic partial crowns—5-year results
title_short Prospective clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic partial crowns—5-year results
title_sort prospective clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic partial crowns—5-year results
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8816527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34415434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04132-y
work_keys_str_mv AT rinkesven prospectiveclinicalevaluationofchairsidefabricatedzirconiareinforcedlithiumsilicateceramicpartialcrowns5yearresults
AT zucktanja prospectiveclinicalevaluationofchairsidefabricatedzirconiareinforcedlithiumsilicateceramicpartialcrowns5yearresults
AT hausdorfertim prospectiveclinicalevaluationofchairsidefabricatedzirconiareinforcedlithiumsilicateceramicpartialcrowns5yearresults
AT lehaandreas prospectiveclinicalevaluationofchairsidefabricatedzirconiareinforcedlithiumsilicateceramicpartialcrowns5yearresults
AT wassmanntorsten prospectiveclinicalevaluationofchairsidefabricatedzirconiareinforcedlithiumsilicateceramicpartialcrowns5yearresults
AT ziebolzdirk prospectiveclinicalevaluationofchairsidefabricatedzirconiareinforcedlithiumsilicateceramicpartialcrowns5yearresults