Cargando…

Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Testing: Assessing Patients' Knowledge, Clinical Experiences, and Utilized Resources in Comparison to Provider's Perceptions

Objective  This survey study aimed to assess patient knowledge, clinical resources, and utilized resources about genetic screening and diagnostic testing. Study Design  A one-time anonymous paper survey was distributed to 500 patients at a major urban obstetrics and gynecology department, and an onl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delgado, Arlin, Schulkin, Jay, Macri, Charles J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8816620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35141032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1742236
_version_ 1784645475802021888
author Delgado, Arlin
Schulkin, Jay
Macri, Charles J.
author_facet Delgado, Arlin
Schulkin, Jay
Macri, Charles J.
author_sort Delgado, Arlin
collection PubMed
description Objective  This survey study aimed to assess patient knowledge, clinical resources, and utilized resources about genetic screening and diagnostic testing. Study Design  A one-time anonymous paper survey was distributed to 500 patients at a major urban obstetrics and gynecology department, and an online survey was sent to 229 providers. Descriptive statistics and chi-squared analyses were performed. Results  In all, 466 of 500 patient surveys were completed, and 441 analyzed (88.2% response rate). Among providers, 66 of 229 (29.0% response rate) responded. Patients were on average 32 years old, 27 weeks pregnant, and most often reported a graduate degree level of education (47.4%). Over 75% of patients reported accurate knowledge of basic genetic statements. Patients reported that discussing screening and diagnostic testing with their provider was significantly associated with properly defining screening and diagnostic testing ( p  < 0.001). Less than 10% of patients reported providers distributing web/video links, books, or any other resource; however, patients most often independently accessed web links (40.1%). Conclusion  Our findings suggest a positive impact from patient and provider discussions in office on patient knowledge and understanding. Discrepancies between educational resources distributed in the clinic and individually accessed resources highlight possible areas of change. Future work should evaluate and implement differing resources to increase patient knowledge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8816620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88166202022-02-08 Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Testing: Assessing Patients' Knowledge, Clinical Experiences, and Utilized Resources in Comparison to Provider's Perceptions Delgado, Arlin Schulkin, Jay Macri, Charles J. AJP Rep Objective  This survey study aimed to assess patient knowledge, clinical resources, and utilized resources about genetic screening and diagnostic testing. Study Design  A one-time anonymous paper survey was distributed to 500 patients at a major urban obstetrics and gynecology department, and an online survey was sent to 229 providers. Descriptive statistics and chi-squared analyses were performed. Results  In all, 466 of 500 patient surveys were completed, and 441 analyzed (88.2% response rate). Among providers, 66 of 229 (29.0% response rate) responded. Patients were on average 32 years old, 27 weeks pregnant, and most often reported a graduate degree level of education (47.4%). Over 75% of patients reported accurate knowledge of basic genetic statements. Patients reported that discussing screening and diagnostic testing with their provider was significantly associated with properly defining screening and diagnostic testing ( p  < 0.001). Less than 10% of patients reported providers distributing web/video links, books, or any other resource; however, patients most often independently accessed web links (40.1%). Conclusion  Our findings suggest a positive impact from patient and provider discussions in office on patient knowledge and understanding. Discrepancies between educational resources distributed in the clinic and individually accessed resources highlight possible areas of change. Future work should evaluate and implement differing resources to increase patient knowledge. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8816620/ /pubmed/35141032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1742236 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Delgado, Arlin
Schulkin, Jay
Macri, Charles J.
Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Testing: Assessing Patients' Knowledge, Clinical Experiences, and Utilized Resources in Comparison to Provider's Perceptions
title Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Testing: Assessing Patients' Knowledge, Clinical Experiences, and Utilized Resources in Comparison to Provider's Perceptions
title_full Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Testing: Assessing Patients' Knowledge, Clinical Experiences, and Utilized Resources in Comparison to Provider's Perceptions
title_fullStr Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Testing: Assessing Patients' Knowledge, Clinical Experiences, and Utilized Resources in Comparison to Provider's Perceptions
title_full_unstemmed Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Testing: Assessing Patients' Knowledge, Clinical Experiences, and Utilized Resources in Comparison to Provider's Perceptions
title_short Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Testing: Assessing Patients' Knowledge, Clinical Experiences, and Utilized Resources in Comparison to Provider's Perceptions
title_sort prenatal genetic screening and diagnostic testing: assessing patients' knowledge, clinical experiences, and utilized resources in comparison to provider's perceptions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8816620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35141032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1742236
work_keys_str_mv AT delgadoarlin prenatalgeneticscreeninganddiagnostictestingassessingpatientsknowledgeclinicalexperiencesandutilizedresourcesincomparisontoprovidersperceptions
AT schulkinjay prenatalgeneticscreeninganddiagnostictestingassessingpatientsknowledgeclinicalexperiencesandutilizedresourcesincomparisontoprovidersperceptions
AT macricharlesj prenatalgeneticscreeninganddiagnostictestingassessingpatientsknowledgeclinicalexperiencesandutilizedresourcesincomparisontoprovidersperceptions