Cargando…
Early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial
OBJECTIVES: To compare the failure rates for three different adhesively retained core build-up composites up to the incorporation of a permanent fixed dental prosthesis (FDP), and to identify potential failure risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of 300 participants in n...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8816765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34491449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04170-6 |
_version_ | 1784645506802122752 |
---|---|
author | Zenthöfer, Andreas Bermejo, Justo Lorenzo Bömicke, Wolfgang Frese, Cornelia Gülmez, Rumeysa Rammelsberg, Peter Ohlmann, Brigitte |
author_facet | Zenthöfer, Andreas Bermejo, Justo Lorenzo Bömicke, Wolfgang Frese, Cornelia Gülmez, Rumeysa Rammelsberg, Peter Ohlmann, Brigitte |
author_sort | Zenthöfer, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare the failure rates for three different adhesively retained core build-up composites up to the incorporation of a permanent fixed dental prosthesis (FDP), and to identify potential failure risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of 300 participants in need of a core build-up to restore a vital abutment tooth before prosthetic treatment was conducted. Participants were assigned by stratified block randomization to one of three study groups: Rebilda DC (RDC), Clearfil DC Core (CDC), or Multicore Flow (MF). Test teeth were prepared by use of the respective manufacturer’s adhesive system. The total-etch technique was used for RDC and MF, and the self-etch technique for CDC. Participants were treated by dentists (n = 150) or dental students (n = 150). Failure rates of core build-ups before incorporation of FDPs were investigated using univariate and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The overall failure rate was 8% (n = 23). Rate differences between the three investigated groups did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). The mean time between placement of core build-ups and placement of fixed dental prostheses was 12.2 (SD: 14.2) weeks. Conversely, larger cavities (> 3 surfaces) and treatment by dental students were independently associated with an increased failure risk (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The main risk factors for early failure seem to be the size of the core build-up and clinical experience of the operator, whereas failure rates of core build-up materials combined with a self-etch approach seem to be similar to the rates of materials combined with the total-etch technique. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This research article should give clinicians an impression of the short-term performance of different adhesively retained core build-ups using different adhesive techniques/materials. Moreover, predominant influencing factors for the success or failure should be pictured. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8816765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88167652022-02-23 Early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial Zenthöfer, Andreas Bermejo, Justo Lorenzo Bömicke, Wolfgang Frese, Cornelia Gülmez, Rumeysa Rammelsberg, Peter Ohlmann, Brigitte Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: To compare the failure rates for three different adhesively retained core build-up composites up to the incorporation of a permanent fixed dental prosthesis (FDP), and to identify potential failure risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of 300 participants in need of a core build-up to restore a vital abutment tooth before prosthetic treatment was conducted. Participants were assigned by stratified block randomization to one of three study groups: Rebilda DC (RDC), Clearfil DC Core (CDC), or Multicore Flow (MF). Test teeth were prepared by use of the respective manufacturer’s adhesive system. The total-etch technique was used for RDC and MF, and the self-etch technique for CDC. Participants were treated by dentists (n = 150) or dental students (n = 150). Failure rates of core build-ups before incorporation of FDPs were investigated using univariate and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The overall failure rate was 8% (n = 23). Rate differences between the three investigated groups did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). The mean time between placement of core build-ups and placement of fixed dental prostheses was 12.2 (SD: 14.2) weeks. Conversely, larger cavities (> 3 surfaces) and treatment by dental students were independently associated with an increased failure risk (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The main risk factors for early failure seem to be the size of the core build-up and clinical experience of the operator, whereas failure rates of core build-up materials combined with a self-etch approach seem to be similar to the rates of materials combined with the total-etch technique. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This research article should give clinicians an impression of the short-term performance of different adhesively retained core build-ups using different adhesive techniques/materials. Moreover, predominant influencing factors for the success or failure should be pictured. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8816765/ /pubmed/34491449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04170-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zenthöfer, Andreas Bermejo, Justo Lorenzo Bömicke, Wolfgang Frese, Cornelia Gülmez, Rumeysa Rammelsberg, Peter Ohlmann, Brigitte Early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial |
title | Early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8816765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34491449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04170-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zenthoferandreas earlyfailureswhenusingthreedifferentadhesivelyretainedcorebuildupmaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bermejojustolorenzo earlyfailureswhenusingthreedifferentadhesivelyretainedcorebuildupmaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bomickewolfgang earlyfailureswhenusingthreedifferentadhesivelyretainedcorebuildupmaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fresecornelia earlyfailureswhenusingthreedifferentadhesivelyretainedcorebuildupmaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gulmezrumeysa earlyfailureswhenusingthreedifferentadhesivelyretainedcorebuildupmaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rammelsbergpeter earlyfailureswhenusingthreedifferentadhesivelyretainedcorebuildupmaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ohlmannbrigitte earlyfailureswhenusingthreedifferentadhesivelyretainedcorebuildupmaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial |