Cargando…

Early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: To compare the failure rates for three different adhesively retained core build-up composites up to the incorporation of a permanent fixed dental prosthesis (FDP), and to identify potential failure risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of 300 participants in n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zenthöfer, Andreas, Bermejo, Justo Lorenzo, Bömicke, Wolfgang, Frese, Cornelia, Gülmez, Rumeysa, Rammelsberg, Peter, Ohlmann, Brigitte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8816765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34491449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04170-6
_version_ 1784645506802122752
author Zenthöfer, Andreas
Bermejo, Justo Lorenzo
Bömicke, Wolfgang
Frese, Cornelia
Gülmez, Rumeysa
Rammelsberg, Peter
Ohlmann, Brigitte
author_facet Zenthöfer, Andreas
Bermejo, Justo Lorenzo
Bömicke, Wolfgang
Frese, Cornelia
Gülmez, Rumeysa
Rammelsberg, Peter
Ohlmann, Brigitte
author_sort Zenthöfer, Andreas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the failure rates for three different adhesively retained core build-up composites up to the incorporation of a permanent fixed dental prosthesis (FDP), and to identify potential failure risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of 300 participants in need of a core build-up to restore a vital abutment tooth before prosthetic treatment was conducted. Participants were assigned by stratified block randomization to one of three study groups: Rebilda DC (RDC), Clearfil DC Core (CDC), or Multicore Flow (MF). Test teeth were prepared by use of the respective manufacturer’s adhesive system. The total-etch technique was used for RDC and MF, and the self-etch technique for CDC. Participants were treated by dentists (n = 150) or dental students (n = 150). Failure rates of core build-ups before incorporation of FDPs were investigated using univariate and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The overall failure rate was 8% (n = 23). Rate differences between the three investigated groups did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). The mean time between placement of core build-ups and placement of fixed dental prostheses was 12.2 (SD: 14.2) weeks. Conversely, larger cavities (> 3 surfaces) and treatment by dental students were independently associated with an increased failure risk (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The main risk factors for early failure seem to be the size of the core build-up and clinical experience of the operator, whereas failure rates of core build-up materials combined with a self-etch approach seem to be similar to the rates of materials combined with the total-etch technique. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This research article should give clinicians an impression of the short-term performance of different adhesively retained core build-ups using different adhesive techniques/materials. Moreover, predominant influencing factors for the success or failure should be pictured.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8816765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88167652022-02-23 Early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial Zenthöfer, Andreas Bermejo, Justo Lorenzo Bömicke, Wolfgang Frese, Cornelia Gülmez, Rumeysa Rammelsberg, Peter Ohlmann, Brigitte Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: To compare the failure rates for three different adhesively retained core build-up composites up to the incorporation of a permanent fixed dental prosthesis (FDP), and to identify potential failure risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of 300 participants in need of a core build-up to restore a vital abutment tooth before prosthetic treatment was conducted. Participants were assigned by stratified block randomization to one of three study groups: Rebilda DC (RDC), Clearfil DC Core (CDC), or Multicore Flow (MF). Test teeth were prepared by use of the respective manufacturer’s adhesive system. The total-etch technique was used for RDC and MF, and the self-etch technique for CDC. Participants were treated by dentists (n = 150) or dental students (n = 150). Failure rates of core build-ups before incorporation of FDPs were investigated using univariate and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The overall failure rate was 8% (n = 23). Rate differences between the three investigated groups did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). The mean time between placement of core build-ups and placement of fixed dental prostheses was 12.2 (SD: 14.2) weeks. Conversely, larger cavities (> 3 surfaces) and treatment by dental students were independently associated with an increased failure risk (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The main risk factors for early failure seem to be the size of the core build-up and clinical experience of the operator, whereas failure rates of core build-up materials combined with a self-etch approach seem to be similar to the rates of materials combined with the total-etch technique. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This research article should give clinicians an impression of the short-term performance of different adhesively retained core build-ups using different adhesive techniques/materials. Moreover, predominant influencing factors for the success or failure should be pictured. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8816765/ /pubmed/34491449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04170-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zenthöfer, Andreas
Bermejo, Justo Lorenzo
Bömicke, Wolfgang
Frese, Cornelia
Gülmez, Rumeysa
Rammelsberg, Peter
Ohlmann, Brigitte
Early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial
title Early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial
title_full Early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial
title_short Early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial
title_sort early failures when using three different adhesively retained core build-up materials—a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8816765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34491449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04170-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zenthoferandreas earlyfailureswhenusingthreedifferentadhesivelyretainedcorebuildupmaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bermejojustolorenzo earlyfailureswhenusingthreedifferentadhesivelyretainedcorebuildupmaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bomickewolfgang earlyfailureswhenusingthreedifferentadhesivelyretainedcorebuildupmaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fresecornelia earlyfailureswhenusingthreedifferentadhesivelyretainedcorebuildupmaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gulmezrumeysa earlyfailureswhenusingthreedifferentadhesivelyretainedcorebuildupmaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rammelsbergpeter earlyfailureswhenusingthreedifferentadhesivelyretainedcorebuildupmaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ohlmannbrigitte earlyfailureswhenusingthreedifferentadhesivelyretainedcorebuildupmaterialsarandomizedcontrolledtrial