Cargando…
Comparison of virus concentration methods and RNA extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance
Wastewater surveillance is a promising tool for population-level monitoring of the spread of infectious diseases, such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Different from clinical specimens, viruses in community-scale wastewater samples need to be concentrated before detection because viral R...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8816846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35134418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153687 |
_version_ | 1784645519338897408 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Xiawan Deng, Yu Xu, Xiaoqing Li, Shuxian Zhang, Yulin Ding, Jiahui On, Hei Yin Lai, Jimmy C.C. In Yau, Chung Chin, Alex W.H. Poon, Leo L.M. Tun, Hein M. Zhang, Tong |
author_facet | Zheng, Xiawan Deng, Yu Xu, Xiaoqing Li, Shuxian Zhang, Yulin Ding, Jiahui On, Hei Yin Lai, Jimmy C.C. In Yau, Chung Chin, Alex W.H. Poon, Leo L.M. Tun, Hein M. Zhang, Tong |
author_sort | Zheng, Xiawan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Wastewater surveillance is a promising tool for population-level monitoring of the spread of infectious diseases, such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Different from clinical specimens, viruses in community-scale wastewater samples need to be concentrated before detection because viral RNA is highly diluted. The present study evaluated eleven different virus concentration methods for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in wastewater. First, eight concentration methods of different principles were compared using spiked wastewater at a starting volume of 30 mL. Ultracentrifugation was the most effective method with a viral recovery efficiency of 25 ± 6%. The second-best option, AlCl(3) precipitation method, yielded a lower recovery efficiency, only approximately half that of the ultracentrifugation method. Second, the potential of increasing method sensitivity was explored using three concentration methods starting with a larger volume of 1000 mL. Although ultracentrifugation using a large volume outperformed the other two large-volume methods, it only yielded a comparable method sensitivity as the ultracentrifugation using a small volume (30 mL). Thus, ultracentrifugation using less volume of wastewater is more preferable considering the sample processing throughput. Third, a comparison of two viral RNA extraction methods showed that the lysis-buffer-based extraction method resulted in higher viral recovery efficiencies, with cycle threshold (Ct) values 0.9–4.2 lower than those obtained for the acid-guanidinium-phenol-based method using spiked samples. These results were further confirmed by using positive wastewater samples concentrated by ultracentrifugation and extracted separately by the two viral RNA extraction methods. In summary, concentration using ultracentrifugation followed by the lysis buffer-based extraction method enables sensitive and robust detection of SARS-CoV-2 for wastewater surveillance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8816846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88168462022-02-07 Comparison of virus concentration methods and RNA extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance Zheng, Xiawan Deng, Yu Xu, Xiaoqing Li, Shuxian Zhang, Yulin Ding, Jiahui On, Hei Yin Lai, Jimmy C.C. In Yau, Chung Chin, Alex W.H. Poon, Leo L.M. Tun, Hein M. Zhang, Tong Sci Total Environ Article Wastewater surveillance is a promising tool for population-level monitoring of the spread of infectious diseases, such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Different from clinical specimens, viruses in community-scale wastewater samples need to be concentrated before detection because viral RNA is highly diluted. The present study evaluated eleven different virus concentration methods for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in wastewater. First, eight concentration methods of different principles were compared using spiked wastewater at a starting volume of 30 mL. Ultracentrifugation was the most effective method with a viral recovery efficiency of 25 ± 6%. The second-best option, AlCl(3) precipitation method, yielded a lower recovery efficiency, only approximately half that of the ultracentrifugation method. Second, the potential of increasing method sensitivity was explored using three concentration methods starting with a larger volume of 1000 mL. Although ultracentrifugation using a large volume outperformed the other two large-volume methods, it only yielded a comparable method sensitivity as the ultracentrifugation using a small volume (30 mL). Thus, ultracentrifugation using less volume of wastewater is more preferable considering the sample processing throughput. Third, a comparison of two viral RNA extraction methods showed that the lysis-buffer-based extraction method resulted in higher viral recovery efficiencies, with cycle threshold (Ct) values 0.9–4.2 lower than those obtained for the acid-guanidinium-phenol-based method using spiked samples. These results were further confirmed by using positive wastewater samples concentrated by ultracentrifugation and extracted separately by the two viral RNA extraction methods. In summary, concentration using ultracentrifugation followed by the lysis buffer-based extraction method enables sensitive and robust detection of SARS-CoV-2 for wastewater surveillance. Elsevier B.V. 2022-06-10 2022-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8816846/ /pubmed/35134418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153687 Text en © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Zheng, Xiawan Deng, Yu Xu, Xiaoqing Li, Shuxian Zhang, Yulin Ding, Jiahui On, Hei Yin Lai, Jimmy C.C. In Yau, Chung Chin, Alex W.H. Poon, Leo L.M. Tun, Hein M. Zhang, Tong Comparison of virus concentration methods and RNA extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance |
title | Comparison of virus concentration methods and RNA extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance |
title_full | Comparison of virus concentration methods and RNA extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance |
title_fullStr | Comparison of virus concentration methods and RNA extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of virus concentration methods and RNA extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance |
title_short | Comparison of virus concentration methods and RNA extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance |
title_sort | comparison of virus concentration methods and rna extraction methods for sars-cov-2 wastewater surveillance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8816846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35134418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153687 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengxiawan comparisonofvirusconcentrationmethodsandrnaextractionmethodsforsarscov2wastewatersurveillance AT dengyu comparisonofvirusconcentrationmethodsandrnaextractionmethodsforsarscov2wastewatersurveillance AT xuxiaoqing comparisonofvirusconcentrationmethodsandrnaextractionmethodsforsarscov2wastewatersurveillance AT lishuxian comparisonofvirusconcentrationmethodsandrnaextractionmethodsforsarscov2wastewatersurveillance AT zhangyulin comparisonofvirusconcentrationmethodsandrnaextractionmethodsforsarscov2wastewatersurveillance AT dingjiahui comparisonofvirusconcentrationmethodsandrnaextractionmethodsforsarscov2wastewatersurveillance AT onheiyin comparisonofvirusconcentrationmethodsandrnaextractionmethodsforsarscov2wastewatersurveillance AT laijimmycc comparisonofvirusconcentrationmethodsandrnaextractionmethodsforsarscov2wastewatersurveillance AT inyauchung comparisonofvirusconcentrationmethodsandrnaextractionmethodsforsarscov2wastewatersurveillance AT chinalexwh comparisonofvirusconcentrationmethodsandrnaextractionmethodsforsarscov2wastewatersurveillance AT poonleolm comparisonofvirusconcentrationmethodsandrnaextractionmethodsforsarscov2wastewatersurveillance AT tunheinm comparisonofvirusconcentrationmethodsandrnaextractionmethodsforsarscov2wastewatersurveillance AT zhangtong comparisonofvirusconcentrationmethodsandrnaextractionmethodsforsarscov2wastewatersurveillance |