Cargando…

Simulated diagnostic performance of low-field MRI: Harnessing open-access datasets to evaluate novel devices

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate a method for virtually evaluating novel imaging devices using machine learning and open-access datasets, here applied to a new, low-field strength portable 64mT MRI device. Paired 3 T and 64mT brain images were used to develop and validate a transformation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arnold, T. Campbell, Baldassano, Steven N., Litt, Brian, Stein, Joel M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8816889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34968700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2021.12.007
_version_ 1784645522260230144
author Arnold, T. Campbell
Baldassano, Steven N.
Litt, Brian
Stein, Joel M.
author_facet Arnold, T. Campbell
Baldassano, Steven N.
Litt, Brian
Stein, Joel M.
author_sort Arnold, T. Campbell
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study is to demonstrate a method for virtually evaluating novel imaging devices using machine learning and open-access datasets, here applied to a new, low-field strength portable 64mT MRI device. Paired 3 T and 64mT brain images were used to develop and validate a transformation converting standard clinical images to low-field quality images. Separately, 3 T images were aggregated from open-source databases spanning four neuropathologies: low-grade glioma (LGG, N = 76), high-grade glioma (HGG, N = 259), stroke (N = 28), and multiple sclerosis (MS, N = 20). The transformation method was then applied to the open-source data to generate simulated low-field images for each pathology. Convolutional neural networks (DenseNet-121) were trained to detect pathology in axial slices from either 3 T or simulated 64 mT images, and their relative performance was compared to characterize the potential diagnostic capabilities of low-field imaging. Algorithm performance was measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Across all cohorts, pathology detection was similar between 3 T and simulated 64mT images (LGG: 0.97 vs. 0.98; HGG: 0.96 vs. 0.95; stroke: 0.94 vs. 0.94; MS: 0.90 vs 0.87). Pathology detection was further characterized as a function of lesion size, intensity, and contrast. Simulated images showed decreasing sensitivity for lesions smaller than 4 cm(2). While simulations cannot replace prospective trials during the evaluation of medical devices, they can provide guidance and justification for prospective studies. Simulated data derived from open-source imaging databases may facilitate testing and validation of new imaging devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8816889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88168892022-04-01 Simulated diagnostic performance of low-field MRI: Harnessing open-access datasets to evaluate novel devices Arnold, T. Campbell Baldassano, Steven N. Litt, Brian Stein, Joel M. Magn Reson Imaging Article The purpose of this study is to demonstrate a method for virtually evaluating novel imaging devices using machine learning and open-access datasets, here applied to a new, low-field strength portable 64mT MRI device. Paired 3 T and 64mT brain images were used to develop and validate a transformation converting standard clinical images to low-field quality images. Separately, 3 T images were aggregated from open-source databases spanning four neuropathologies: low-grade glioma (LGG, N = 76), high-grade glioma (HGG, N = 259), stroke (N = 28), and multiple sclerosis (MS, N = 20). The transformation method was then applied to the open-source data to generate simulated low-field images for each pathology. Convolutional neural networks (DenseNet-121) were trained to detect pathology in axial slices from either 3 T or simulated 64 mT images, and their relative performance was compared to characterize the potential diagnostic capabilities of low-field imaging. Algorithm performance was measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Across all cohorts, pathology detection was similar between 3 T and simulated 64mT images (LGG: 0.97 vs. 0.98; HGG: 0.96 vs. 0.95; stroke: 0.94 vs. 0.94; MS: 0.90 vs 0.87). Pathology detection was further characterized as a function of lesion size, intensity, and contrast. Simulated images showed decreasing sensitivity for lesions smaller than 4 cm(2). While simulations cannot replace prospective trials during the evaluation of medical devices, they can provide guidance and justification for prospective studies. Simulated data derived from open-source imaging databases may facilitate testing and validation of new imaging devices. 2022-04 2021-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8816889/ /pubmed/34968700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2021.12.007 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Arnold, T. Campbell
Baldassano, Steven N.
Litt, Brian
Stein, Joel M.
Simulated diagnostic performance of low-field MRI: Harnessing open-access datasets to evaluate novel devices
title Simulated diagnostic performance of low-field MRI: Harnessing open-access datasets to evaluate novel devices
title_full Simulated diagnostic performance of low-field MRI: Harnessing open-access datasets to evaluate novel devices
title_fullStr Simulated diagnostic performance of low-field MRI: Harnessing open-access datasets to evaluate novel devices
title_full_unstemmed Simulated diagnostic performance of low-field MRI: Harnessing open-access datasets to evaluate novel devices
title_short Simulated diagnostic performance of low-field MRI: Harnessing open-access datasets to evaluate novel devices
title_sort simulated diagnostic performance of low-field mri: harnessing open-access datasets to evaluate novel devices
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8816889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34968700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2021.12.007
work_keys_str_mv AT arnoldtcampbell simulateddiagnosticperformanceoflowfieldmriharnessingopenaccessdatasetstoevaluatenoveldevices
AT baldassanostevenn simulateddiagnosticperformanceoflowfieldmriharnessingopenaccessdatasetstoevaluatenoveldevices
AT littbrian simulateddiagnosticperformanceoflowfieldmriharnessingopenaccessdatasetstoevaluatenoveldevices
AT steinjoelm simulateddiagnosticperformanceoflowfieldmriharnessingopenaccessdatasetstoevaluatenoveldevices