Cargando…
Tick bites in different professions and regions: pooled cross-sectional study in the focus area Bavaria, Germany
BACKGROUND: As the vector-borne diseases tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) and Lyme borreliosis (LB) are common in Germany and transmitted by tick bites, the aim of this study was to assess differences in the number of tick bites in various professions and regions across southern Germany to evaluate the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35120477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12456-3 |
_version_ | 1784645655185063936 |
---|---|
author | Schielein, Louisa Tizek, Linda Biedermann, Tilo Zink, Alexander |
author_facet | Schielein, Louisa Tizek, Linda Biedermann, Tilo Zink, Alexander |
author_sort | Schielein, Louisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As the vector-borne diseases tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) and Lyme borreliosis (LB) are common in Germany and transmitted by tick bites, the aim of this study was to assess differences in the number of tick bites in various professions and regions across southern Germany to evaluate the differences in tick-associated risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis is based on three cross-sectional studies that were conducted in 2016 and 2017 in two real-life settings and in one medical setting in Bavaria. All participants filled in a paper-based questionnaire about their history with tick bites. Only adult participants (≥ 18 years) were included in this study. RESULTS: Overall, 3503 individuals (mean age 50.8 ± 15.2 years, median age 53.0 ± 12.2 years, 54.0% female) were included. Of these, 50% worked in an outdoor profession and 56% lived in environs. Around 70% of participants reported at least one previous tick bite. In comparison to indoor workers, forestry workers (OR = 2.50; 95% CI: 1.10–5.68) had the highest risk for a tick bite followed by farmers (OR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.01–1.47). Furthermore, people living in rural areas (OR = 1.97, 95% CI:1.49–2.59) and environs (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.54–2.55) were twice as likely to have a previous tick bite than people living in urban areas. In general, slightly more tick bites were reported by people living in eastern Bavaria. CONCLUSION: Rising numbers of TBE and LB indicate the need for further prevention strategies, which should focus on outdoor professions with a higher risk and people living in environs and rural areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8817479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88174792022-02-07 Tick bites in different professions and regions: pooled cross-sectional study in the focus area Bavaria, Germany Schielein, Louisa Tizek, Linda Biedermann, Tilo Zink, Alexander BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: As the vector-borne diseases tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) and Lyme borreliosis (LB) are common in Germany and transmitted by tick bites, the aim of this study was to assess differences in the number of tick bites in various professions and regions across southern Germany to evaluate the differences in tick-associated risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis is based on three cross-sectional studies that were conducted in 2016 and 2017 in two real-life settings and in one medical setting in Bavaria. All participants filled in a paper-based questionnaire about their history with tick bites. Only adult participants (≥ 18 years) were included in this study. RESULTS: Overall, 3503 individuals (mean age 50.8 ± 15.2 years, median age 53.0 ± 12.2 years, 54.0% female) were included. Of these, 50% worked in an outdoor profession and 56% lived in environs. Around 70% of participants reported at least one previous tick bite. In comparison to indoor workers, forestry workers (OR = 2.50; 95% CI: 1.10–5.68) had the highest risk for a tick bite followed by farmers (OR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.01–1.47). Furthermore, people living in rural areas (OR = 1.97, 95% CI:1.49–2.59) and environs (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.54–2.55) were twice as likely to have a previous tick bite than people living in urban areas. In general, slightly more tick bites were reported by people living in eastern Bavaria. CONCLUSION: Rising numbers of TBE and LB indicate the need for further prevention strategies, which should focus on outdoor professions with a higher risk and people living in environs and rural areas. BioMed Central 2022-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8817479/ /pubmed/35120477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12456-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Schielein, Louisa Tizek, Linda Biedermann, Tilo Zink, Alexander Tick bites in different professions and regions: pooled cross-sectional study in the focus area Bavaria, Germany |
title | Tick bites in different professions and regions: pooled cross-sectional study in the focus area Bavaria, Germany |
title_full | Tick bites in different professions and regions: pooled cross-sectional study in the focus area Bavaria, Germany |
title_fullStr | Tick bites in different professions and regions: pooled cross-sectional study in the focus area Bavaria, Germany |
title_full_unstemmed | Tick bites in different professions and regions: pooled cross-sectional study in the focus area Bavaria, Germany |
title_short | Tick bites in different professions and regions: pooled cross-sectional study in the focus area Bavaria, Germany |
title_sort | tick bites in different professions and regions: pooled cross-sectional study in the focus area bavaria, germany |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35120477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12456-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schieleinlouisa tickbitesindifferentprofessionsandregionspooledcrosssectionalstudyinthefocusareabavariagermany AT tizeklinda tickbitesindifferentprofessionsandregionspooledcrosssectionalstudyinthefocusareabavariagermany AT biedermanntilo tickbitesindifferentprofessionsandregionspooledcrosssectionalstudyinthefocusareabavariagermany AT zinkalexander tickbitesindifferentprofessionsandregionspooledcrosssectionalstudyinthefocusareabavariagermany |