Cargando…

Modified techniques versus Hadfield’s procedure in patients with periductal mastitis

BACKGROUND: Periductal mastitis (PM) is a rare disease characterized by chronic inflammation of the terminal mammary ducts. Complete removal of terminal lactiferous ducts with Hadfield procedure is a previously defined technique in treatment but carries various complications risks. This study aims t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dalci, Kubilay, Gumus, Serdar, Saritas, Ahmet Gokhan, Gul, Mehmet Onur, Rencuzogullari, Ahmet, Akcam, Atilgan Tolga, Ulku, Abdullah, Ergin, Melek, Sakman, Gurhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35120473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01496-0
_version_ 1784645657408045056
author Dalci, Kubilay
Gumus, Serdar
Saritas, Ahmet Gokhan
Gul, Mehmet Onur
Rencuzogullari, Ahmet
Akcam, Atilgan Tolga
Ulku, Abdullah
Ergin, Melek
Sakman, Gurhan
author_facet Dalci, Kubilay
Gumus, Serdar
Saritas, Ahmet Gokhan
Gul, Mehmet Onur
Rencuzogullari, Ahmet
Akcam, Atilgan Tolga
Ulku, Abdullah
Ergin, Melek
Sakman, Gurhan
author_sort Dalci, Kubilay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Periductal mastitis (PM) is a rare disease characterized by chronic inflammation of the terminal mammary ducts. Complete removal of terminal lactiferous ducts with Hadfield procedure is a previously defined technique in treatment but carries various complications risks. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of modified techniques in the treatment of PM. METHODS: Twenty women who underwent surgery due to PM between January 2012 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Types of PM were determined. All patients were operated on with three different incisions [Hadfield’s operation with periareolar incision (n:11), periareolar combined radial incision (n:7), and round block incision (n:2)]. RESULTS: The mean age was 37.5 ± 6.5 years (range: 24–49). Sixty percent of patients had type 3 PM. In Hadfield’s procedure, NAC retraction (n:2), seroma (n:1), and hematoma (n:1) were seen. In the periareolar incision combined radial incision group only one patient had complications (seroma) and none in the round block method. Follow-up was 12 ± 1.5 months and disease relapse occurred in two patients in the Hadfield group. Patients who underwent round block were more satisfied with the appearance of the nipple. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of PM, the main principle of surgical treatment is the excision of the affected canal with a clear margin. Apart from the classical Hadfield procedure, the round block method and periareolar combined radial incision techniques can be performed in the treatment of PM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8817489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88174892022-02-07 Modified techniques versus Hadfield’s procedure in patients with periductal mastitis Dalci, Kubilay Gumus, Serdar Saritas, Ahmet Gokhan Gul, Mehmet Onur Rencuzogullari, Ahmet Akcam, Atilgan Tolga Ulku, Abdullah Ergin, Melek Sakman, Gurhan BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: Periductal mastitis (PM) is a rare disease characterized by chronic inflammation of the terminal mammary ducts. Complete removal of terminal lactiferous ducts with Hadfield procedure is a previously defined technique in treatment but carries various complications risks. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of modified techniques in the treatment of PM. METHODS: Twenty women who underwent surgery due to PM between January 2012 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Types of PM were determined. All patients were operated on with three different incisions [Hadfield’s operation with periareolar incision (n:11), periareolar combined radial incision (n:7), and round block incision (n:2)]. RESULTS: The mean age was 37.5 ± 6.5 years (range: 24–49). Sixty percent of patients had type 3 PM. In Hadfield’s procedure, NAC retraction (n:2), seroma (n:1), and hematoma (n:1) were seen. In the periareolar incision combined radial incision group only one patient had complications (seroma) and none in the round block method. Follow-up was 12 ± 1.5 months and disease relapse occurred in two patients in the Hadfield group. Patients who underwent round block were more satisfied with the appearance of the nipple. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of PM, the main principle of surgical treatment is the excision of the affected canal with a clear margin. Apart from the classical Hadfield procedure, the round block method and periareolar combined radial incision techniques can be performed in the treatment of PM. BioMed Central 2022-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8817489/ /pubmed/35120473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01496-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Dalci, Kubilay
Gumus, Serdar
Saritas, Ahmet Gokhan
Gul, Mehmet Onur
Rencuzogullari, Ahmet
Akcam, Atilgan Tolga
Ulku, Abdullah
Ergin, Melek
Sakman, Gurhan
Modified techniques versus Hadfield’s procedure in patients with periductal mastitis
title Modified techniques versus Hadfield’s procedure in patients with periductal mastitis
title_full Modified techniques versus Hadfield’s procedure in patients with periductal mastitis
title_fullStr Modified techniques versus Hadfield’s procedure in patients with periductal mastitis
title_full_unstemmed Modified techniques versus Hadfield’s procedure in patients with periductal mastitis
title_short Modified techniques versus Hadfield’s procedure in patients with periductal mastitis
title_sort modified techniques versus hadfield’s procedure in patients with periductal mastitis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35120473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01496-0
work_keys_str_mv AT dalcikubilay modifiedtechniquesversushadfieldsprocedureinpatientswithperiductalmastitis
AT gumusserdar modifiedtechniquesversushadfieldsprocedureinpatientswithperiductalmastitis
AT saritasahmetgokhan modifiedtechniquesversushadfieldsprocedureinpatientswithperiductalmastitis
AT gulmehmetonur modifiedtechniquesversushadfieldsprocedureinpatientswithperiductalmastitis
AT rencuzogullariahmet modifiedtechniquesversushadfieldsprocedureinpatientswithperiductalmastitis
AT akcamatilgantolga modifiedtechniquesversushadfieldsprocedureinpatientswithperiductalmastitis
AT ulkuabdullah modifiedtechniquesversushadfieldsprocedureinpatientswithperiductalmastitis
AT erginmelek modifiedtechniquesversushadfieldsprocedureinpatientswithperiductalmastitis
AT sakmangurhan modifiedtechniquesversushadfieldsprocedureinpatientswithperiductalmastitis