Cargando…

Efficacy and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilar compared to their reference products: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: To ascertain the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity from existing evidence via conducting a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials between biosimilar and originator insulins. METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrails.gov were searched to identify head-to-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Li-Jou, Wu, Ta-Wei, Tang, Chao-Hsiun, Peng, Tzu-Rong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-00944-5
_version_ 1784645674748346368
author Yang, Li-Jou
Wu, Ta-Wei
Tang, Chao-Hsiun
Peng, Tzu-Rong
author_facet Yang, Li-Jou
Wu, Ta-Wei
Tang, Chao-Hsiun
Peng, Tzu-Rong
author_sort Yang, Li-Jou
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To ascertain the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity from existing evidence via conducting a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials between biosimilar and originator insulins. METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrails.gov were searched to identify head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compare the efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulin and its originator. Efficacy was assessed by change of HbA1C, fasting plasma glucose (laboratory or self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG)), and change all mean of 7 points- or 8 points- SMBG. Safety was assessed by change in proportion hypoglycemia and serious hypoglycemia. The occurrence of anti-insulin antibodies (AIAs) was also evaluated. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs with 6188 patients from different countries were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model and were expressed as the mean difference (MD), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI). In efficacy, Insulin biosimilar products showed similar in change of HbA1C at weeks 26 and 52, the MD were 0.03 (95% CI − 0.02 to 0.07, p = 0.28), and 0.05 (95% CI − 0.05 to 0.15, p = 0.36), respectively. The proportion of HbA1C less than 7% at endpoint, the OR were 1.04 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.20, p = 0.64). The change of fasting plasma glucose (laboratory or SMBG) mmol/L in 24–52 weeks and change all mean of 7 points−/8 points- SMBG mmol/L in 24–52 weeks, the MD were 0.02 (95% CI − 0.20 to 0.24, p = 0.87) and − 0.34 (95% CI − 1.35 to 0.67, p = 0.51), respectively. In occurrence of hypoglycemia (≥ 1 events) and severe hypoglycemia, the OR were 0.96 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.09, p = 0.52) and 1.06 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.31, p = 0.62). The AIA was 1.02 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.16, p = 0.76). Analysis stratified by type of diabetes and duration of insulin. There was no significant difference between the biosimilar and their reference group in a different type of diabetes and different duration of insulin. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin biosimilar showed comparable characteristics with the reference drug in terms of efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, through comprehensive and specific conventional meta-analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12902-022-00944-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8817566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88175662022-02-07 Efficacy and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilar compared to their reference products: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yang, Li-Jou Wu, Ta-Wei Tang, Chao-Hsiun Peng, Tzu-Rong BMC Endocr Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: To ascertain the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity from existing evidence via conducting a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials between biosimilar and originator insulins. METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrails.gov were searched to identify head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compare the efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulin and its originator. Efficacy was assessed by change of HbA1C, fasting plasma glucose (laboratory or self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG)), and change all mean of 7 points- or 8 points- SMBG. Safety was assessed by change in proportion hypoglycemia and serious hypoglycemia. The occurrence of anti-insulin antibodies (AIAs) was also evaluated. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs with 6188 patients from different countries were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model and were expressed as the mean difference (MD), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI). In efficacy, Insulin biosimilar products showed similar in change of HbA1C at weeks 26 and 52, the MD were 0.03 (95% CI − 0.02 to 0.07, p = 0.28), and 0.05 (95% CI − 0.05 to 0.15, p = 0.36), respectively. The proportion of HbA1C less than 7% at endpoint, the OR were 1.04 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.20, p = 0.64). The change of fasting plasma glucose (laboratory or SMBG) mmol/L in 24–52 weeks and change all mean of 7 points−/8 points- SMBG mmol/L in 24–52 weeks, the MD were 0.02 (95% CI − 0.20 to 0.24, p = 0.87) and − 0.34 (95% CI − 1.35 to 0.67, p = 0.51), respectively. In occurrence of hypoglycemia (≥ 1 events) and severe hypoglycemia, the OR were 0.96 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.09, p = 0.52) and 1.06 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.31, p = 0.62). The AIA was 1.02 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.16, p = 0.76). Analysis stratified by type of diabetes and duration of insulin. There was no significant difference between the biosimilar and their reference group in a different type of diabetes and different duration of insulin. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin biosimilar showed comparable characteristics with the reference drug in terms of efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, through comprehensive and specific conventional meta-analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12902-022-00944-5. BioMed Central 2022-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8817566/ /pubmed/35123455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-00944-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Li-Jou
Wu, Ta-Wei
Tang, Chao-Hsiun
Peng, Tzu-Rong
Efficacy and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilar compared to their reference products: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilar compared to their reference products: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilar compared to their reference products: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilar compared to their reference products: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilar compared to their reference products: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilar compared to their reference products: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilar compared to their reference products: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-00944-5
work_keys_str_mv AT yanglijou efficacyandimmunogenicityofinsulinbiosimilarcomparedtotheirreferenceproductsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wutawei efficacyandimmunogenicityofinsulinbiosimilarcomparedtotheirreferenceproductsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tangchaohsiun efficacyandimmunogenicityofinsulinbiosimilarcomparedtotheirreferenceproductsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pengtzurong efficacyandimmunogenicityofinsulinbiosimilarcomparedtotheirreferenceproductsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis