Cargando…

The effect of first- and third-generation prophylactic antibiotics on hospitalization and medical expenditures for cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the efficacy of first-generation (cefazolin) and third-generation (ceftizoxime) prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and the incidence of surgical site infections, hospitalizations, and medical costs. METHODS: All adult patients (≥ 20 ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bae, Sung-Jin, Kim, Inah, Song, Jaechul, Chung, Euy-Suk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35120545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01763-4
_version_ 1784645676002443264
author Bae, Sung-Jin
Kim, Inah
Song, Jaechul
Chung, Euy-Suk
author_facet Bae, Sung-Jin
Kim, Inah
Song, Jaechul
Chung, Euy-Suk
author_sort Bae, Sung-Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study investigated the efficacy of first-generation (cefazolin) and third-generation (ceftizoxime) prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and the incidence of surgical site infections, hospitalizations, and medical costs. METHODS: All adult patients (≥ 20 years) undergoing cardiac surgery at one hospital from January 01, 2009, to December 31, 2016, were included in this study. A single prophylactic antibiotic was administered at a dose of 1 g within one hour of the surgical incision and for three days after surgery at eight-hour intervals. After propensity score matching, 194 patients in each antibiotic prophylaxis group (first-generation vs third-generation) were analyzed. Among the 388 patients, the incidence of surgical site infections was compared according to the type of prophylactic antibiotic, and risk factors were evaluated by chi-squared tests followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of deep surgical site infections was significantly lower in the first-generation group (5.7%) than in the third-generation group (16.5%). The pathogens isolated from the surgical infection sites were similarly distributed in both groups. However, the prevalence of highly infectious gram-positive bacteria was more than that of gram-negative bacteria (67% vs 23%). The preoperative hospitalization duration, mean operation time, and ventilator use time were similar in both groups, but the postoperative hospitalization duration was significantly shorter in the first-generation group (25.5 days) than in the third-generation group (29.8 days). In addition, the medical costs were lower in the first-generation group (20,594 USD) than in the third-generation group (26,488 USD). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the first-generation prophylactic antibiotic was better than the third-generation in reducing surgical site infection rates, hospitalization length, and medical expenditures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13019-022-01763-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8817574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88175742022-02-07 The effect of first- and third-generation prophylactic antibiotics on hospitalization and medical expenditures for cardiac surgery Bae, Sung-Jin Kim, Inah Song, Jaechul Chung, Euy-Suk J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: This study investigated the efficacy of first-generation (cefazolin) and third-generation (ceftizoxime) prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and the incidence of surgical site infections, hospitalizations, and medical costs. METHODS: All adult patients (≥ 20 years) undergoing cardiac surgery at one hospital from January 01, 2009, to December 31, 2016, were included in this study. A single prophylactic antibiotic was administered at a dose of 1 g within one hour of the surgical incision and for three days after surgery at eight-hour intervals. After propensity score matching, 194 patients in each antibiotic prophylaxis group (first-generation vs third-generation) were analyzed. Among the 388 patients, the incidence of surgical site infections was compared according to the type of prophylactic antibiotic, and risk factors were evaluated by chi-squared tests followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of deep surgical site infections was significantly lower in the first-generation group (5.7%) than in the third-generation group (16.5%). The pathogens isolated from the surgical infection sites were similarly distributed in both groups. However, the prevalence of highly infectious gram-positive bacteria was more than that of gram-negative bacteria (67% vs 23%). The preoperative hospitalization duration, mean operation time, and ventilator use time were similar in both groups, but the postoperative hospitalization duration was significantly shorter in the first-generation group (25.5 days) than in the third-generation group (29.8 days). In addition, the medical costs were lower in the first-generation group (20,594 USD) than in the third-generation group (26,488 USD). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the first-generation prophylactic antibiotic was better than the third-generation in reducing surgical site infection rates, hospitalization length, and medical expenditures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13019-022-01763-4. BioMed Central 2022-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8817574/ /pubmed/35120545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01763-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bae, Sung-Jin
Kim, Inah
Song, Jaechul
Chung, Euy-Suk
The effect of first- and third-generation prophylactic antibiotics on hospitalization and medical expenditures for cardiac surgery
title The effect of first- and third-generation prophylactic antibiotics on hospitalization and medical expenditures for cardiac surgery
title_full The effect of first- and third-generation prophylactic antibiotics on hospitalization and medical expenditures for cardiac surgery
title_fullStr The effect of first- and third-generation prophylactic antibiotics on hospitalization and medical expenditures for cardiac surgery
title_full_unstemmed The effect of first- and third-generation prophylactic antibiotics on hospitalization and medical expenditures for cardiac surgery
title_short The effect of first- and third-generation prophylactic antibiotics on hospitalization and medical expenditures for cardiac surgery
title_sort effect of first- and third-generation prophylactic antibiotics on hospitalization and medical expenditures for cardiac surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35120545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01763-4
work_keys_str_mv AT baesungjin theeffectoffirstandthirdgenerationprophylacticantibioticsonhospitalizationandmedicalexpendituresforcardiacsurgery
AT kiminah theeffectoffirstandthirdgenerationprophylacticantibioticsonhospitalizationandmedicalexpendituresforcardiacsurgery
AT songjaechul theeffectoffirstandthirdgenerationprophylacticantibioticsonhospitalizationandmedicalexpendituresforcardiacsurgery
AT chungeuysuk theeffectoffirstandthirdgenerationprophylacticantibioticsonhospitalizationandmedicalexpendituresforcardiacsurgery
AT baesungjin effectoffirstandthirdgenerationprophylacticantibioticsonhospitalizationandmedicalexpendituresforcardiacsurgery
AT kiminah effectoffirstandthirdgenerationprophylacticantibioticsonhospitalizationandmedicalexpendituresforcardiacsurgery
AT songjaechul effectoffirstandthirdgenerationprophylacticantibioticsonhospitalizationandmedicalexpendituresforcardiacsurgery
AT chungeuysuk effectoffirstandthirdgenerationprophylacticantibioticsonhospitalizationandmedicalexpendituresforcardiacsurgery