Cargando…

Co-production: a kind revolution

Carnegie UK (CUK) and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) INVOLVE held a meeting on the co-production of research, how we work together on equal terms. We brought together public contributors and individuals from organisations focused on research. We wanted to discuss how co-production cou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Staniszewska, Sophie, Hickey, Gary, Coutts, Pippa, Thurman, Ben, Coldham, Tina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00340-2
_version_ 1784645690605961216
author Staniszewska, Sophie
Hickey, Gary
Coutts, Pippa
Thurman, Ben
Coldham, Tina
author_facet Staniszewska, Sophie
Hickey, Gary
Coutts, Pippa
Thurman, Ben
Coldham, Tina
author_sort Staniszewska, Sophie
collection PubMed
description Carnegie UK (CUK) and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) INVOLVE held a meeting on the co-production of research, how we work together on equal terms. We brought together public contributors and individuals from organisations focused on research. We wanted to discuss how co-production could work in research, how it could be seen as business as usual, and to think through the barriers that stop us from working together, as well as the things that can help us move forward. While we agreed that the idea of working together is important, we recognised there are still many challenges to co-production being seen as a normal activity in research and the development of a ‘business case’ to persuade others is still needed. We also considered the wider civic roles that Universities are adopting as important in helping co-production become normal practice. Discussion focused on issues such as power and how it works in research. We recognised that we also need to create the right conditions for co-production, changing research culture so it becomes kinder, with a focus on the development of relationships. We also recognised the need for enough time for honest, high quality conversations between patients, public contributors and researchers that take account of how power works in research. Co-production was seen as a societal ‘good,’ helping us live well by undertaking research together that benefits the health of the public. We also identified a range of ways we could move co-production forward, recognising we are on a journey and that current societal changes brought about by Covid-19 may result in us being more radical in how we rethink the ways we want to work in research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8817643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88176432022-02-07 Co-production: a kind revolution Staniszewska, Sophie Hickey, Gary Coutts, Pippa Thurman, Ben Coldham, Tina Res Involv Engagem Commentary Carnegie UK (CUK) and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) INVOLVE held a meeting on the co-production of research, how we work together on equal terms. We brought together public contributors and individuals from organisations focused on research. We wanted to discuss how co-production could work in research, how it could be seen as business as usual, and to think through the barriers that stop us from working together, as well as the things that can help us move forward. While we agreed that the idea of working together is important, we recognised there are still many challenges to co-production being seen as a normal activity in research and the development of a ‘business case’ to persuade others is still needed. We also considered the wider civic roles that Universities are adopting as important in helping co-production become normal practice. Discussion focused on issues such as power and how it works in research. We recognised that we also need to create the right conditions for co-production, changing research culture so it becomes kinder, with a focus on the development of relationships. We also recognised the need for enough time for honest, high quality conversations between patients, public contributors and researchers that take account of how power works in research. Co-production was seen as a societal ‘good,’ helping us live well by undertaking research together that benefits the health of the public. We also identified a range of ways we could move co-production forward, recognising we are on a journey and that current societal changes brought about by Covid-19 may result in us being more radical in how we rethink the ways we want to work in research. BioMed Central 2022-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8817643/ /pubmed/35123585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00340-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Staniszewska, Sophie
Hickey, Gary
Coutts, Pippa
Thurman, Ben
Coldham, Tina
Co-production: a kind revolution
title Co-production: a kind revolution
title_full Co-production: a kind revolution
title_fullStr Co-production: a kind revolution
title_full_unstemmed Co-production: a kind revolution
title_short Co-production: a kind revolution
title_sort co-production: a kind revolution
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00340-2
work_keys_str_mv AT staniszewskasophie coproductionakindrevolution
AT hickeygary coproductionakindrevolution
AT couttspippa coproductionakindrevolution
AT thurmanben coproductionakindrevolution
AT coldhamtina coproductionakindrevolution