Cargando…
Co-production: a kind revolution
Carnegie UK (CUK) and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) INVOLVE held a meeting on the co-production of research, how we work together on equal terms. We brought together public contributors and individuals from organisations focused on research. We wanted to discuss how co-production cou...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00340-2 |
_version_ | 1784645690605961216 |
---|---|
author | Staniszewska, Sophie Hickey, Gary Coutts, Pippa Thurman, Ben Coldham, Tina |
author_facet | Staniszewska, Sophie Hickey, Gary Coutts, Pippa Thurman, Ben Coldham, Tina |
author_sort | Staniszewska, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Carnegie UK (CUK) and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) INVOLVE held a meeting on the co-production of research, how we work together on equal terms. We brought together public contributors and individuals from organisations focused on research. We wanted to discuss how co-production could work in research, how it could be seen as business as usual, and to think through the barriers that stop us from working together, as well as the things that can help us move forward. While we agreed that the idea of working together is important, we recognised there are still many challenges to co-production being seen as a normal activity in research and the development of a ‘business case’ to persuade others is still needed. We also considered the wider civic roles that Universities are adopting as important in helping co-production become normal practice. Discussion focused on issues such as power and how it works in research. We recognised that we also need to create the right conditions for co-production, changing research culture so it becomes kinder, with a focus on the development of relationships. We also recognised the need for enough time for honest, high quality conversations between patients, public contributors and researchers that take account of how power works in research. Co-production was seen as a societal ‘good,’ helping us live well by undertaking research together that benefits the health of the public. We also identified a range of ways we could move co-production forward, recognising we are on a journey and that current societal changes brought about by Covid-19 may result in us being more radical in how we rethink the ways we want to work in research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8817643 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88176432022-02-07 Co-production: a kind revolution Staniszewska, Sophie Hickey, Gary Coutts, Pippa Thurman, Ben Coldham, Tina Res Involv Engagem Commentary Carnegie UK (CUK) and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) INVOLVE held a meeting on the co-production of research, how we work together on equal terms. We brought together public contributors and individuals from organisations focused on research. We wanted to discuss how co-production could work in research, how it could be seen as business as usual, and to think through the barriers that stop us from working together, as well as the things that can help us move forward. While we agreed that the idea of working together is important, we recognised there are still many challenges to co-production being seen as a normal activity in research and the development of a ‘business case’ to persuade others is still needed. We also considered the wider civic roles that Universities are adopting as important in helping co-production become normal practice. Discussion focused on issues such as power and how it works in research. We recognised that we also need to create the right conditions for co-production, changing research culture so it becomes kinder, with a focus on the development of relationships. We also recognised the need for enough time for honest, high quality conversations between patients, public contributors and researchers that take account of how power works in research. Co-production was seen as a societal ‘good,’ helping us live well by undertaking research together that benefits the health of the public. We also identified a range of ways we could move co-production forward, recognising we are on a journey and that current societal changes brought about by Covid-19 may result in us being more radical in how we rethink the ways we want to work in research. BioMed Central 2022-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8817643/ /pubmed/35123585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00340-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Staniszewska, Sophie Hickey, Gary Coutts, Pippa Thurman, Ben Coldham, Tina Co-production: a kind revolution |
title | Co-production: a kind revolution |
title_full | Co-production: a kind revolution |
title_fullStr | Co-production: a kind revolution |
title_full_unstemmed | Co-production: a kind revolution |
title_short | Co-production: a kind revolution |
title_sort | co-production: a kind revolution |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00340-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT staniszewskasophie coproductionakindrevolution AT hickeygary coproductionakindrevolution AT couttspippa coproductionakindrevolution AT thurmanben coproductionakindrevolution AT coldhamtina coproductionakindrevolution |