Cargando…
Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study
Background: Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems is being rapidly adopted as standard of care for insulin-requiring patients with diabetes. The PROMISE study (NCT03808376) evaluated the accuracy and safety of the next-generation implantable Eversense CGM system for up to 180 days. Meth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34515521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2021.0182 |
_version_ | 1784645696885882880 |
---|---|
author | Garg, Satish K. Liljenquist, David Bode, Bruce Christiansen, Mark P. Bailey, Timothy S. Brazg, Ronald L. Denham, Douglas S. Chang, Anna R. Akturk, Halis Kaan Dehennis, Andrew Tweden, Katherine S. Kaufman, Francine R. |
author_facet | Garg, Satish K. Liljenquist, David Bode, Bruce Christiansen, Mark P. Bailey, Timothy S. Brazg, Ronald L. Denham, Douglas S. Chang, Anna R. Akturk, Halis Kaan Dehennis, Andrew Tweden, Katherine S. Kaufman, Francine R. |
author_sort | Garg, Satish K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems is being rapidly adopted as standard of care for insulin-requiring patients with diabetes. The PROMISE study (NCT03808376) evaluated the accuracy and safety of the next-generation implantable Eversense CGM system for up to 180 days. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter study involving 181 subjects with diabetes at 8 USA sites. All subjects were inserted with a primary sensor. Ninety-six subjects had a second sensor, either an identical sensor or a modified sensor (sacrificial boronic acid [SBA]), inserted in their other arm (53 and 43 subjects, respectively). Accuracy was evaluated by comparing CGM to YSI 2300 glucose analyzer (Yellow Springs Instrument [YSI]) values during 10 clinic visits (day 1–180). Confirmed event detection rates, calibration stability, sensor survival, and serious adverse events (SAEs) were evaluated. Results: For primary sensors, the percent CGM readings within 20%/20% of YSI values was 92.9%; overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 9.1%. The confirmed alert detection rate at 70 mg/dL was 93% and at 180 mg/dL was 99%. The median percentage of time for one calibration per day was 56%. Sixty-five percent of the primary sensors survived to 180 days. For the SBA sensors, the percent CGM readings within 20%/20% of YSI values was 93.9%; overall MARD was 8.5%. The confirmed alert detection rate at 70 mg/dL was 94% and at 180 mg/dL was 99%. The median percentage of time for one calibration per day was 63%. Ninety percent of the SBA sensors survived to 180 days. No device- or insertion/removal procedure-related SAEs were reported. Conclusion: These data show the next-generation Eversense CGM system had sustained accuracy and safety up to 180 days, with an improved calibration scheme and survival, using the primary or SBA sensors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8817689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88176892022-02-07 Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study Garg, Satish K. Liljenquist, David Bode, Bruce Christiansen, Mark P. Bailey, Timothy S. Brazg, Ronald L. Denham, Douglas S. Chang, Anna R. Akturk, Halis Kaan Dehennis, Andrew Tweden, Katherine S. Kaufman, Francine R. Diabetes Technol Ther Original Articles Background: Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems is being rapidly adopted as standard of care for insulin-requiring patients with diabetes. The PROMISE study (NCT03808376) evaluated the accuracy and safety of the next-generation implantable Eversense CGM system for up to 180 days. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter study involving 181 subjects with diabetes at 8 USA sites. All subjects were inserted with a primary sensor. Ninety-six subjects had a second sensor, either an identical sensor or a modified sensor (sacrificial boronic acid [SBA]), inserted in their other arm (53 and 43 subjects, respectively). Accuracy was evaluated by comparing CGM to YSI 2300 glucose analyzer (Yellow Springs Instrument [YSI]) values during 10 clinic visits (day 1–180). Confirmed event detection rates, calibration stability, sensor survival, and serious adverse events (SAEs) were evaluated. Results: For primary sensors, the percent CGM readings within 20%/20% of YSI values was 92.9%; overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 9.1%. The confirmed alert detection rate at 70 mg/dL was 93% and at 180 mg/dL was 99%. The median percentage of time for one calibration per day was 56%. Sixty-five percent of the primary sensors survived to 180 days. For the SBA sensors, the percent CGM readings within 20%/20% of YSI values was 93.9%; overall MARD was 8.5%. The confirmed alert detection rate at 70 mg/dL was 94% and at 180 mg/dL was 99%. The median percentage of time for one calibration per day was 63%. Ninety percent of the SBA sensors survived to 180 days. No device- or insertion/removal procedure-related SAEs were reported. Conclusion: These data show the next-generation Eversense CGM system had sustained accuracy and safety up to 180 days, with an improved calibration scheme and survival, using the primary or SBA sensors. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022-02-01 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8817689/ /pubmed/34515521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2021.0182 Text en © Satish K. Garg, et al., 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Garg, Satish K. Liljenquist, David Bode, Bruce Christiansen, Mark P. Bailey, Timothy S. Brazg, Ronald L. Denham, Douglas S. Chang, Anna R. Akturk, Halis Kaan Dehennis, Andrew Tweden, Katherine S. Kaufman, Francine R. Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study |
title | Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study |
title_full | Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study |
title_short | Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study |
title_sort | evaluation of accuracy and safety of the next-generation up to 180-day long-term implantable eversense continuous glucose monitoring system: the promise study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34515521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2021.0182 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gargsatishk evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy AT liljenquistdavid evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy AT bodebruce evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy AT christiansenmarkp evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy AT baileytimothys evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy AT brazgronaldl evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy AT denhamdouglass evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy AT changannar evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy AT akturkhaliskaan evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy AT dehennisandrew evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy AT twedenkatherines evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy AT kaufmanfranciner evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy |