Cargando…

Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study

Background: Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems is being rapidly adopted as standard of care for insulin-requiring patients with diabetes. The PROMISE study (NCT03808376) evaluated the accuracy and safety of the next-generation implantable Eversense CGM system for up to 180 days. Meth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garg, Satish K., Liljenquist, David, Bode, Bruce, Christiansen, Mark P., Bailey, Timothy S., Brazg, Ronald L., Denham, Douglas S., Chang, Anna R., Akturk, Halis Kaan, Dehennis, Andrew, Tweden, Katherine S., Kaufman, Francine R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34515521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2021.0182
_version_ 1784645696885882880
author Garg, Satish K.
Liljenquist, David
Bode, Bruce
Christiansen, Mark P.
Bailey, Timothy S.
Brazg, Ronald L.
Denham, Douglas S.
Chang, Anna R.
Akturk, Halis Kaan
Dehennis, Andrew
Tweden, Katherine S.
Kaufman, Francine R.
author_facet Garg, Satish K.
Liljenquist, David
Bode, Bruce
Christiansen, Mark P.
Bailey, Timothy S.
Brazg, Ronald L.
Denham, Douglas S.
Chang, Anna R.
Akturk, Halis Kaan
Dehennis, Andrew
Tweden, Katherine S.
Kaufman, Francine R.
author_sort Garg, Satish K.
collection PubMed
description Background: Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems is being rapidly adopted as standard of care for insulin-requiring patients with diabetes. The PROMISE study (NCT03808376) evaluated the accuracy and safety of the next-generation implantable Eversense CGM system for up to 180 days. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter study involving 181 subjects with diabetes at 8 USA sites. All subjects were inserted with a primary sensor. Ninety-six subjects had a second sensor, either an identical sensor or a modified sensor (sacrificial boronic acid [SBA]), inserted in their other arm (53 and 43 subjects, respectively). Accuracy was evaluated by comparing CGM to YSI 2300 glucose analyzer (Yellow Springs Instrument [YSI]) values during 10 clinic visits (day 1–180). Confirmed event detection rates, calibration stability, sensor survival, and serious adverse events (SAEs) were evaluated. Results: For primary sensors, the percent CGM readings within 20%/20% of YSI values was 92.9%; overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 9.1%. The confirmed alert detection rate at 70 mg/dL was 93% and at 180 mg/dL was 99%. The median percentage of time for one calibration per day was 56%. Sixty-five percent of the primary sensors survived to 180 days. For the SBA sensors, the percent CGM readings within 20%/20% of YSI values was 93.9%; overall MARD was 8.5%. The confirmed alert detection rate at 70 mg/dL was 94% and at 180 mg/dL was 99%. The median percentage of time for one calibration per day was 63%. Ninety percent of the SBA sensors survived to 180 days. No device- or insertion/removal procedure-related SAEs were reported. Conclusion: These data show the next-generation Eversense CGM system had sustained accuracy and safety up to 180 days, with an improved calibration scheme and survival, using the primary or SBA sensors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8817689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88176892022-02-07 Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study Garg, Satish K. Liljenquist, David Bode, Bruce Christiansen, Mark P. Bailey, Timothy S. Brazg, Ronald L. Denham, Douglas S. Chang, Anna R. Akturk, Halis Kaan Dehennis, Andrew Tweden, Katherine S. Kaufman, Francine R. Diabetes Technol Ther Original Articles Background: Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems is being rapidly adopted as standard of care for insulin-requiring patients with diabetes. The PROMISE study (NCT03808376) evaluated the accuracy and safety of the next-generation implantable Eversense CGM system for up to 180 days. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter study involving 181 subjects with diabetes at 8 USA sites. All subjects were inserted with a primary sensor. Ninety-six subjects had a second sensor, either an identical sensor or a modified sensor (sacrificial boronic acid [SBA]), inserted in their other arm (53 and 43 subjects, respectively). Accuracy was evaluated by comparing CGM to YSI 2300 glucose analyzer (Yellow Springs Instrument [YSI]) values during 10 clinic visits (day 1–180). Confirmed event detection rates, calibration stability, sensor survival, and serious adverse events (SAEs) were evaluated. Results: For primary sensors, the percent CGM readings within 20%/20% of YSI values was 92.9%; overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 9.1%. The confirmed alert detection rate at 70 mg/dL was 93% and at 180 mg/dL was 99%. The median percentage of time for one calibration per day was 56%. Sixty-five percent of the primary sensors survived to 180 days. For the SBA sensors, the percent CGM readings within 20%/20% of YSI values was 93.9%; overall MARD was 8.5%. The confirmed alert detection rate at 70 mg/dL was 94% and at 180 mg/dL was 99%. The median percentage of time for one calibration per day was 63%. Ninety percent of the SBA sensors survived to 180 days. No device- or insertion/removal procedure-related SAEs were reported. Conclusion: These data show the next-generation Eversense CGM system had sustained accuracy and safety up to 180 days, with an improved calibration scheme and survival, using the primary or SBA sensors. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022-02-01 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8817689/ /pubmed/34515521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2021.0182 Text en © Satish K. Garg, et al., 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Garg, Satish K.
Liljenquist, David
Bode, Bruce
Christiansen, Mark P.
Bailey, Timothy S.
Brazg, Ronald L.
Denham, Douglas S.
Chang, Anna R.
Akturk, Halis Kaan
Dehennis, Andrew
Tweden, Katherine S.
Kaufman, Francine R.
Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study
title Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study
title_full Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study
title_short Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study
title_sort evaluation of accuracy and safety of the next-generation up to 180-day long-term implantable eversense continuous glucose monitoring system: the promise study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34515521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2021.0182
work_keys_str_mv AT gargsatishk evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy
AT liljenquistdavid evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy
AT bodebruce evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy
AT christiansenmarkp evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy
AT baileytimothys evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy
AT brazgronaldl evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy
AT denhamdouglass evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy
AT changannar evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy
AT akturkhaliskaan evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy
AT dehennisandrew evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy
AT twedenkatherines evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy
AT kaufmanfranciner evaluationofaccuracyandsafetyofthenextgenerationupto180daylongtermimplantableeversensecontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemthepromisestudy