Cargando…

Comparison of avascular lymph node fragment transplantation techniques to optimize lymphangiogenesis in the minipig model

BACKGROUND: Secondary lymphoedema is a challenging pandemic. This condition may arise after oncologic resection of tumor-draining lymph nodes and/or radiation. Plastic-surgical procedures for lymphoedema comprise transplantation of vascularized lymph node flaps, which are, however, technically chall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hadamitzky, Catarina, Bruns, Frank, Gratz, Klaus-Friedrich, Schindewolffs, Lia, Roth, Katrin S., Werner, Martin, Gordon, Kristiana, Vogt, Peter M., Pabst, Reinhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35210698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01869-3
_version_ 1784645750429319168
author Hadamitzky, Catarina
Bruns, Frank
Gratz, Klaus-Friedrich
Schindewolffs, Lia
Roth, Katrin S.
Werner, Martin
Gordon, Kristiana
Vogt, Peter M.
Pabst, Reinhard
author_facet Hadamitzky, Catarina
Bruns, Frank
Gratz, Klaus-Friedrich
Schindewolffs, Lia
Roth, Katrin S.
Werner, Martin
Gordon, Kristiana
Vogt, Peter M.
Pabst, Reinhard
author_sort Hadamitzky, Catarina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Secondary lymphoedema is a challenging pandemic. This condition may arise after oncologic resection of tumor-draining lymph nodes and/or radiation. Plastic-surgical procedures for lymphoedema comprise transplantation of vascularized lymph node flaps, which are, however, technically challenging and difficult to implement on a global level due to the scarcity of microsurgery facilities in some countries. To improve this situation, comparative research in valid animal models is needed. METHODS: A total of 33 minipigs were subjected to lymphatic resection in the hind limbs. This large animal model was used in a first phase to compare different lymph node fragmentation methods and assess lymphatic regeneration after avascular transplantation. In a second phase, several stimulants were tested for their effect on lymphatic regeneration after fragment transplantation. In a third phase, animals additionally received irradiation of the groin. In this novel animal model, autologous avascular lymph node fragment transplantation was complemented by peripheral injections of vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C). Finally, regeneration rates were quantified in relative numbers (percentage) in the irradiated tissue. RESULTS: In the first phase, transversal lymph node fragmentation under preservation of the nodal capsule showed the best percentage of regeneration (62.5%). Peripheral intradermal administration of VEGF-C enhanced lymph node fragment regeneration (70.8%) better than injections of tetanus toxoid (41.6%) or Streptococcus suis (62.5%). Lymph node fragment regeneration also occurred in an irradiated porcine model of lymphadenectomy under VEGF-C administration (66.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings provide a pre-clinical proof-of-concept for a possible simplification strategy for current operative procedures of autologous lymph node transplantation. Level of evidence : Not gradable
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8818007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88180072022-02-22 Comparison of avascular lymph node fragment transplantation techniques to optimize lymphangiogenesis in the minipig model Hadamitzky, Catarina Bruns, Frank Gratz, Klaus-Friedrich Schindewolffs, Lia Roth, Katrin S. Werner, Martin Gordon, Kristiana Vogt, Peter M. Pabst, Reinhard Eur J Plast Surg Experimental Study BACKGROUND: Secondary lymphoedema is a challenging pandemic. This condition may arise after oncologic resection of tumor-draining lymph nodes and/or radiation. Plastic-surgical procedures for lymphoedema comprise transplantation of vascularized lymph node flaps, which are, however, technically challenging and difficult to implement on a global level due to the scarcity of microsurgery facilities in some countries. To improve this situation, comparative research in valid animal models is needed. METHODS: A total of 33 minipigs were subjected to lymphatic resection in the hind limbs. This large animal model was used in a first phase to compare different lymph node fragmentation methods and assess lymphatic regeneration after avascular transplantation. In a second phase, several stimulants were tested for their effect on lymphatic regeneration after fragment transplantation. In a third phase, animals additionally received irradiation of the groin. In this novel animal model, autologous avascular lymph node fragment transplantation was complemented by peripheral injections of vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C). Finally, regeneration rates were quantified in relative numbers (percentage) in the irradiated tissue. RESULTS: In the first phase, transversal lymph node fragmentation under preservation of the nodal capsule showed the best percentage of regeneration (62.5%). Peripheral intradermal administration of VEGF-C enhanced lymph node fragment regeneration (70.8%) better than injections of tetanus toxoid (41.6%) or Streptococcus suis (62.5%). Lymph node fragment regeneration also occurred in an irradiated porcine model of lymphadenectomy under VEGF-C administration (66.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings provide a pre-clinical proof-of-concept for a possible simplification strategy for current operative procedures of autologous lymph node transplantation. Level of evidence : Not gradable Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8818007/ /pubmed/35210698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01869-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Experimental Study
Hadamitzky, Catarina
Bruns, Frank
Gratz, Klaus-Friedrich
Schindewolffs, Lia
Roth, Katrin S.
Werner, Martin
Gordon, Kristiana
Vogt, Peter M.
Pabst, Reinhard
Comparison of avascular lymph node fragment transplantation techniques to optimize lymphangiogenesis in the minipig model
title Comparison of avascular lymph node fragment transplantation techniques to optimize lymphangiogenesis in the minipig model
title_full Comparison of avascular lymph node fragment transplantation techniques to optimize lymphangiogenesis in the minipig model
title_fullStr Comparison of avascular lymph node fragment transplantation techniques to optimize lymphangiogenesis in the minipig model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of avascular lymph node fragment transplantation techniques to optimize lymphangiogenesis in the minipig model
title_short Comparison of avascular lymph node fragment transplantation techniques to optimize lymphangiogenesis in the minipig model
title_sort comparison of avascular lymph node fragment transplantation techniques to optimize lymphangiogenesis in the minipig model
topic Experimental Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35210698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01869-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hadamitzkycatarina comparisonofavascularlymphnodefragmenttransplantationtechniquestooptimizelymphangiogenesisintheminipigmodel
AT brunsfrank comparisonofavascularlymphnodefragmenttransplantationtechniquestooptimizelymphangiogenesisintheminipigmodel
AT gratzklausfriedrich comparisonofavascularlymphnodefragmenttransplantationtechniquestooptimizelymphangiogenesisintheminipigmodel
AT schindewolffslia comparisonofavascularlymphnodefragmenttransplantationtechniquestooptimizelymphangiogenesisintheminipigmodel
AT rothkatrins comparisonofavascularlymphnodefragmenttransplantationtechniquestooptimizelymphangiogenesisintheminipigmodel
AT wernermartin comparisonofavascularlymphnodefragmenttransplantationtechniquestooptimizelymphangiogenesisintheminipigmodel
AT gordonkristiana comparisonofavascularlymphnodefragmenttransplantationtechniquestooptimizelymphangiogenesisintheminipigmodel
AT vogtpeterm comparisonofavascularlymphnodefragmenttransplantationtechniquestooptimizelymphangiogenesisintheminipigmodel
AT pabstreinhard comparisonofavascularlymphnodefragmenttransplantationtechniquestooptimizelymphangiogenesisintheminipigmodel