Cargando…

Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: While chronic workplace stress is known to be associated with health-related outcomes like mental and cardiovascular diseases, research about day-to-day occupational stress is limited. This systematic review includes studies assessing stress exposures as work environment risk factors and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lukan, Junoš, Bolliger, Larissa, Pauwels, Nele S., Luštrek, Mitja, Bacquer, Dirk De, Clays, Els
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12354-8
_version_ 1784645770398400512
author Lukan, Junoš
Bolliger, Larissa
Pauwels, Nele S.
Luštrek, Mitja
Bacquer, Dirk De
Clays, Els
author_facet Lukan, Junoš
Bolliger, Larissa
Pauwels, Nele S.
Luštrek, Mitja
Bacquer, Dirk De
Clays, Els
author_sort Lukan, Junoš
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While chronic workplace stress is known to be associated with health-related outcomes like mental and cardiovascular diseases, research about day-to-day occupational stress is limited. This systematic review includes studies assessing stress exposures as work environment risk factors and stress outcomes, measured via self-perceived questionnaires and physiological stress detection. These measures needed to be assessed repeatedly or continuously via Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) or similar methods carried out in real-world work environments, to be included in this review. The objective was to identify work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress. METHODS: The search strategies were applied in seven databases resulting in 11833 records after deduplication, of which 41 studies were included in a qualitative synthesis. Associations were evaluated by correlational analyses. RESULTS: The most commonly measured work environment risk factor was work intensity, while stress was most often framed as an affective response. Measures from these two dimensions were also most frequently correlated with each other and most of their correlation coefficients were statistically significant, making work intensity a major risk factor for day-to-day workplace stress. CONCLUSIONS: This review reveals a diversity in methodological approaches in data collection and data analysis. More studies combining self-perceived stress exposures and outcomes with physiological measures are warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12889-021-12354-8).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8818147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88181472022-02-07 Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review Lukan, Junoš Bolliger, Larissa Pauwels, Nele S. Luštrek, Mitja Bacquer, Dirk De Clays, Els BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: While chronic workplace stress is known to be associated with health-related outcomes like mental and cardiovascular diseases, research about day-to-day occupational stress is limited. This systematic review includes studies assessing stress exposures as work environment risk factors and stress outcomes, measured via self-perceived questionnaires and physiological stress detection. These measures needed to be assessed repeatedly or continuously via Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) or similar methods carried out in real-world work environments, to be included in this review. The objective was to identify work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress. METHODS: The search strategies were applied in seven databases resulting in 11833 records after deduplication, of which 41 studies were included in a qualitative synthesis. Associations were evaluated by correlational analyses. RESULTS: The most commonly measured work environment risk factor was work intensity, while stress was most often framed as an affective response. Measures from these two dimensions were also most frequently correlated with each other and most of their correlation coefficients were statistically significant, making work intensity a major risk factor for day-to-day workplace stress. CONCLUSIONS: This review reveals a diversity in methodological approaches in data collection and data analysis. More studies combining self-perceived stress exposures and outcomes with physiological measures are warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12889-021-12354-8). BioMed Central 2022-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8818147/ /pubmed/35123449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12354-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lukan, Junoš
Bolliger, Larissa
Pauwels, Nele S.
Luštrek, Mitja
Bacquer, Dirk De
Clays, Els
Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review
title Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review
title_full Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review
title_fullStr Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review
title_short Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review
title_sort work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12354-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lukanjunos workenvironmentriskfactorscausingdaytodaystressinoccupationalsettingsasystematicreview
AT bolligerlarissa workenvironmentriskfactorscausingdaytodaystressinoccupationalsettingsasystematicreview
AT pauwelsneles workenvironmentriskfactorscausingdaytodaystressinoccupationalsettingsasystematicreview
AT lustrekmitja workenvironmentriskfactorscausingdaytodaystressinoccupationalsettingsasystematicreview
AT bacquerdirkde workenvironmentriskfactorscausingdaytodaystressinoccupationalsettingsasystematicreview
AT claysels workenvironmentriskfactorscausingdaytodaystressinoccupationalsettingsasystematicreview