Cargando…
Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: While chronic workplace stress is known to be associated with health-related outcomes like mental and cardiovascular diseases, research about day-to-day occupational stress is limited. This systematic review includes studies assessing stress exposures as work environment risk factors and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12354-8 |
_version_ | 1784645770398400512 |
---|---|
author | Lukan, Junoš Bolliger, Larissa Pauwels, Nele S. Luštrek, Mitja Bacquer, Dirk De Clays, Els |
author_facet | Lukan, Junoš Bolliger, Larissa Pauwels, Nele S. Luštrek, Mitja Bacquer, Dirk De Clays, Els |
author_sort | Lukan, Junoš |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While chronic workplace stress is known to be associated with health-related outcomes like mental and cardiovascular diseases, research about day-to-day occupational stress is limited. This systematic review includes studies assessing stress exposures as work environment risk factors and stress outcomes, measured via self-perceived questionnaires and physiological stress detection. These measures needed to be assessed repeatedly or continuously via Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) or similar methods carried out in real-world work environments, to be included in this review. The objective was to identify work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress. METHODS: The search strategies were applied in seven databases resulting in 11833 records after deduplication, of which 41 studies were included in a qualitative synthesis. Associations were evaluated by correlational analyses. RESULTS: The most commonly measured work environment risk factor was work intensity, while stress was most often framed as an affective response. Measures from these two dimensions were also most frequently correlated with each other and most of their correlation coefficients were statistically significant, making work intensity a major risk factor for day-to-day workplace stress. CONCLUSIONS: This review reveals a diversity in methodological approaches in data collection and data analysis. More studies combining self-perceived stress exposures and outcomes with physiological measures are warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12889-021-12354-8). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8818147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88181472022-02-07 Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review Lukan, Junoš Bolliger, Larissa Pauwels, Nele S. Luštrek, Mitja Bacquer, Dirk De Clays, Els BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: While chronic workplace stress is known to be associated with health-related outcomes like mental and cardiovascular diseases, research about day-to-day occupational stress is limited. This systematic review includes studies assessing stress exposures as work environment risk factors and stress outcomes, measured via self-perceived questionnaires and physiological stress detection. These measures needed to be assessed repeatedly or continuously via Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) or similar methods carried out in real-world work environments, to be included in this review. The objective was to identify work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress. METHODS: The search strategies were applied in seven databases resulting in 11833 records after deduplication, of which 41 studies were included in a qualitative synthesis. Associations were evaluated by correlational analyses. RESULTS: The most commonly measured work environment risk factor was work intensity, while stress was most often framed as an affective response. Measures from these two dimensions were also most frequently correlated with each other and most of their correlation coefficients were statistically significant, making work intensity a major risk factor for day-to-day workplace stress. CONCLUSIONS: This review reveals a diversity in methodological approaches in data collection and data analysis. More studies combining self-perceived stress exposures and outcomes with physiological measures are warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12889-021-12354-8). BioMed Central 2022-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8818147/ /pubmed/35123449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12354-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lukan, Junoš Bolliger, Larissa Pauwels, Nele S. Luštrek, Mitja Bacquer, Dirk De Clays, Els Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review |
title | Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review |
title_full | Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review |
title_short | Work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review |
title_sort | work environment risk factors causing day-to-day stress in occupational settings: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12354-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lukanjunos workenvironmentriskfactorscausingdaytodaystressinoccupationalsettingsasystematicreview AT bolligerlarissa workenvironmentriskfactorscausingdaytodaystressinoccupationalsettingsasystematicreview AT pauwelsneles workenvironmentriskfactorscausingdaytodaystressinoccupationalsettingsasystematicreview AT lustrekmitja workenvironmentriskfactorscausingdaytodaystressinoccupationalsettingsasystematicreview AT bacquerdirkde workenvironmentriskfactorscausingdaytodaystressinoccupationalsettingsasystematicreview AT claysels workenvironmentriskfactorscausingdaytodaystressinoccupationalsettingsasystematicreview |