Cargando…

Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Depression is one of the commonest mental disorders in primary care but is poorly identified. The objective of this review was to determine the level of detection of depression by primary care clinicians and its determinants in studies from low- to middle-income countries (LMICs). METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fekadu, Abebaw, Demissie, Mekdes, Birhane, Rahel, Medhin, Girmay, Bitew, Tesera, Hailemariam, Maji, Minaye, Abebaw, Habtamu, Kassahun, Milkias, Barkot, Petersen, Inge, Patel, Vikram, Cleare, Anthony J., Mayston, Rosie, Thornicroft, Graham, Alem, Atalay, Hanlon, Charlotte, Prince, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01893-9
_version_ 1784645774634647552
author Fekadu, Abebaw
Demissie, Mekdes
Birhane, Rahel
Medhin, Girmay
Bitew, Tesera
Hailemariam, Maji
Minaye, Abebaw
Habtamu, Kassahun
Milkias, Barkot
Petersen, Inge
Patel, Vikram
Cleare, Anthony J.
Mayston, Rosie
Thornicroft, Graham
Alem, Atalay
Hanlon, Charlotte
Prince, Martin
author_facet Fekadu, Abebaw
Demissie, Mekdes
Birhane, Rahel
Medhin, Girmay
Bitew, Tesera
Hailemariam, Maji
Minaye, Abebaw
Habtamu, Kassahun
Milkias, Barkot
Petersen, Inge
Patel, Vikram
Cleare, Anthony J.
Mayston, Rosie
Thornicroft, Graham
Alem, Atalay
Hanlon, Charlotte
Prince, Martin
author_sort Fekadu, Abebaw
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Depression is one of the commonest mental disorders in primary care but is poorly identified. The objective of this review was to determine the level of detection of depression by primary care clinicians and its determinants in studies from low- to middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILAC, and AJOL with no restriction of year of publication. Risk of bias within studies was evaluated with the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP). “Gold standard” diagnosis for the purposes of this review was based on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; cutoff scores of 5 and 10), other standard questionnaires and interview scales or expert diagnosis. Meta-analysis was conducted excluding studies on special populations. Analyses of pooled data were stratified by diagnostic approaches. RESULTS: A total of 3159 non-duplicate publications were screened. Nine publications, 2 multi-country studies, and 7 single-country studies, making 12 country-level reports, were included. Overall methodological quality of the studies was good. Depression detection was 0.0% in four of the twelve reports and < 12% in another five. PHQ-9 was the main tool used: the pooled detection in two reports that used PHQ-9 at a cutoff point of 5 (combined sample size = 1426) was 3.9% (95% CI = 2.3%, 5.5%); in four reports that used PHQ-9 cutoff score of 10 (combined sample size = 5481), the pooled detection was 7.0% (95% CI = 3.9%, 10.2%). Severity of depression and suicidality were significantly associated with detection. CONCLUSIONS: While the use of screening tools is an important limitation, the extremely low detection of depression by primary care clinicians poses a serious threat to scaling up mental healthcare in LMICs. Interventions to improve detection should be prioritized. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016039704. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-01893-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8818168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88181682022-02-07 Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fekadu, Abebaw Demissie, Mekdes Birhane, Rahel Medhin, Girmay Bitew, Tesera Hailemariam, Maji Minaye, Abebaw Habtamu, Kassahun Milkias, Barkot Petersen, Inge Patel, Vikram Cleare, Anthony J. Mayston, Rosie Thornicroft, Graham Alem, Atalay Hanlon, Charlotte Prince, Martin Syst Rev Systematic Review Update BACKGROUND: Depression is one of the commonest mental disorders in primary care but is poorly identified. The objective of this review was to determine the level of detection of depression by primary care clinicians and its determinants in studies from low- to middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILAC, and AJOL with no restriction of year of publication. Risk of bias within studies was evaluated with the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP). “Gold standard” diagnosis for the purposes of this review was based on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; cutoff scores of 5 and 10), other standard questionnaires and interview scales or expert diagnosis. Meta-analysis was conducted excluding studies on special populations. Analyses of pooled data were stratified by diagnostic approaches. RESULTS: A total of 3159 non-duplicate publications were screened. Nine publications, 2 multi-country studies, and 7 single-country studies, making 12 country-level reports, were included. Overall methodological quality of the studies was good. Depression detection was 0.0% in four of the twelve reports and < 12% in another five. PHQ-9 was the main tool used: the pooled detection in two reports that used PHQ-9 at a cutoff point of 5 (combined sample size = 1426) was 3.9% (95% CI = 2.3%, 5.5%); in four reports that used PHQ-9 cutoff score of 10 (combined sample size = 5481), the pooled detection was 7.0% (95% CI = 3.9%, 10.2%). Severity of depression and suicidality were significantly associated with detection. CONCLUSIONS: While the use of screening tools is an important limitation, the extremely low detection of depression by primary care clinicians poses a serious threat to scaling up mental healthcare in LMICs. Interventions to improve detection should be prioritized. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016039704. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-01893-9. BioMed Central 2022-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8818168/ /pubmed/35123556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01893-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review Update
Fekadu, Abebaw
Demissie, Mekdes
Birhane, Rahel
Medhin, Girmay
Bitew, Tesera
Hailemariam, Maji
Minaye, Abebaw
Habtamu, Kassahun
Milkias, Barkot
Petersen, Inge
Patel, Vikram
Cleare, Anthony J.
Mayston, Rosie
Thornicroft, Graham
Alem, Atalay
Hanlon, Charlotte
Prince, Martin
Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review Update
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01893-9
work_keys_str_mv AT fekaduabebaw underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT demissiemekdes underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT birhanerahel underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT medhingirmay underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bitewtesera underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hailemariammaji underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT minayeabebaw underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT habtamukassahun underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT milkiasbarkot underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT peterseninge underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT patelvikram underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cleareanthonyj underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maystonrosie underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thornicroftgraham underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alematalay underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanloncharlotte underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT princemartin underdetectionofdepressioninprimarycaresettingsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis