Cargando…

Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: a technical and prospective preclinical validation

BACKGROUND: The development of accurate urinary biomarkers for non-invasive and cost-effective detection of primary and recurrent bladder tumours is recognized as one of the major clinical needs in bladder cancer diagnostics. The purposes of this study were (1) to validate the results of a previous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hentschel, Anouk E., Beijert, Irene J., Bosschieter, Judith, Kauer, Paul C., Vis, André N., Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I., van Moorselaar, R. Jeroen A., Steenbergen, Renske D. M., Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01240-8
_version_ 1784645781932736512
author Hentschel, Anouk E.
Beijert, Irene J.
Bosschieter, Judith
Kauer, Paul C.
Vis, André N.
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I.
van Moorselaar, R. Jeroen A.
Steenbergen, Renske D. M.
Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A.
author_facet Hentschel, Anouk E.
Beijert, Irene J.
Bosschieter, Judith
Kauer, Paul C.
Vis, André N.
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I.
van Moorselaar, R. Jeroen A.
Steenbergen, Renske D. M.
Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A.
author_sort Hentschel, Anouk E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The development of accurate urinary biomarkers for non-invasive and cost-effective detection of primary and recurrent bladder tumours is recognized as one of the major clinical needs in bladder cancer diagnostics. The purposes of this study were (1) to validate the results of a previous technical comparison by determining the diagnostic performance of nine methylation markers in urine pellet compared to full void urine, and (2) to validate the diagnostic performance of the optimal marker panel GHSR/MAL from a previous exploratory study in a preclinical setting. METHODS: Urine samples of 108 patients with bladder cancer and 100 age- and gender-matched controls were prospectively collected for methylation analysis. Urinary methylation levels of the markers FAM19A4, GHSR, MAL, miR-129, miR-935, PHACTR3, PRDM14, SST and ZIC1 were determined with quantitative methylation-specific PCR in urine pellet. Area under the curves (AUCs) were determined for individual markers and the marker panel GHSR/MAL. The diagnostic performance of the marker panel GHSR/MAL was evaluated in the total study population and in different subgroups of patients with bladder cancer using the Chi-square test. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed by leave-one-out cross-validation. RESULTS: All nine urinary methylation markers (FAM19A4, GHSR, MAL, miR-129, miR-935, PHACTR3, PRDM14, SST and ZIC1) showed significantly higher methylation levels in bladder cancer patients than in controls (p < 0.001). Area under the curves (AUCs) of the nine methylation markers tested in urine pellet were similar to AUCs in full void urine of an independent previous cohort. GHSR/MAL reached an AUC of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–0.94), at 80% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Sensitivity of GHSR/MAL increased with higher tumour grades, higher tumour stages, in primary vs. recurrent tumours, and in males vs. females. CONCLUSIONS: This technical validation supports the robustness of DNA methylation analysis in urine pellet and full void urine for the non-invasive detection of bladder cancer. Subsequent preclinical validation confirmed the diagnostic potential of GHSR/MAL. These findings underline the diagnostic potential of the marker panel GHSR/MAL for future bladder cancer diagnostics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13148-022-01240-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8818199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88181992022-02-07 Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: a technical and prospective preclinical validation Hentschel, Anouk E. Beijert, Irene J. Bosschieter, Judith Kauer, Paul C. Vis, André N. Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I. van Moorselaar, R. Jeroen A. Steenbergen, Renske D. M. Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A. Clin Epigenetics Research BACKGROUND: The development of accurate urinary biomarkers for non-invasive and cost-effective detection of primary and recurrent bladder tumours is recognized as one of the major clinical needs in bladder cancer diagnostics. The purposes of this study were (1) to validate the results of a previous technical comparison by determining the diagnostic performance of nine methylation markers in urine pellet compared to full void urine, and (2) to validate the diagnostic performance of the optimal marker panel GHSR/MAL from a previous exploratory study in a preclinical setting. METHODS: Urine samples of 108 patients with bladder cancer and 100 age- and gender-matched controls were prospectively collected for methylation analysis. Urinary methylation levels of the markers FAM19A4, GHSR, MAL, miR-129, miR-935, PHACTR3, PRDM14, SST and ZIC1 were determined with quantitative methylation-specific PCR in urine pellet. Area under the curves (AUCs) were determined for individual markers and the marker panel GHSR/MAL. The diagnostic performance of the marker panel GHSR/MAL was evaluated in the total study population and in different subgroups of patients with bladder cancer using the Chi-square test. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed by leave-one-out cross-validation. RESULTS: All nine urinary methylation markers (FAM19A4, GHSR, MAL, miR-129, miR-935, PHACTR3, PRDM14, SST and ZIC1) showed significantly higher methylation levels in bladder cancer patients than in controls (p < 0.001). Area under the curves (AUCs) of the nine methylation markers tested in urine pellet were similar to AUCs in full void urine of an independent previous cohort. GHSR/MAL reached an AUC of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–0.94), at 80% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Sensitivity of GHSR/MAL increased with higher tumour grades, higher tumour stages, in primary vs. recurrent tumours, and in males vs. females. CONCLUSIONS: This technical validation supports the robustness of DNA methylation analysis in urine pellet and full void urine for the non-invasive detection of bladder cancer. Subsequent preclinical validation confirmed the diagnostic potential of GHSR/MAL. These findings underline the diagnostic potential of the marker panel GHSR/MAL for future bladder cancer diagnostics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13148-022-01240-8. BioMed Central 2022-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8818199/ /pubmed/35123558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01240-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hentschel, Anouk E.
Beijert, Irene J.
Bosschieter, Judith
Kauer, Paul C.
Vis, André N.
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I.
van Moorselaar, R. Jeroen A.
Steenbergen, Renske D. M.
Nieuwenhuijzen, Jakko A.
Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: a technical and prospective preclinical validation
title Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: a technical and prospective preclinical validation
title_full Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: a technical and prospective preclinical validation
title_fullStr Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: a technical and prospective preclinical validation
title_full_unstemmed Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: a technical and prospective preclinical validation
title_short Bladder cancer detection in urine using DNA methylation markers: a technical and prospective preclinical validation
title_sort bladder cancer detection in urine using dna methylation markers: a technical and prospective preclinical validation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01240-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hentschelanouke bladdercancerdetectioninurineusingdnamethylationmarkersatechnicalandprospectivepreclinicalvalidation
AT beijertirenej bladdercancerdetectioninurineusingdnamethylationmarkersatechnicalandprospectivepreclinicalvalidation
AT bosschieterjudith bladdercancerdetectioninurineusingdnamethylationmarkersatechnicalandprospectivepreclinicalvalidation
AT kauerpaulc bladdercancerdetectioninurineusingdnamethylationmarkersatechnicalandprospectivepreclinicalvalidation
AT visandren bladdercancerdetectioninurineusingdnamethylationmarkersatechnicalandprospectivepreclinicalvalidation
AT lissenbergwittebirgiti bladdercancerdetectioninurineusingdnamethylationmarkersatechnicalandprospectivepreclinicalvalidation
AT vanmoorselaarrjeroena bladdercancerdetectioninurineusingdnamethylationmarkersatechnicalandprospectivepreclinicalvalidation
AT steenbergenrenskedm bladdercancerdetectioninurineusingdnamethylationmarkersatechnicalandprospectivepreclinicalvalidation
AT nieuwenhuijzenjakkoa bladdercancerdetectioninurineusingdnamethylationmarkersatechnicalandprospectivepreclinicalvalidation