Cargando…
Outcomes of four-point suture fixated and two-point sutureless posterior chamber IOLs combined with pars plana vitrectomy
BACKGROUND: While each scleral fixation method has its own advantages, there is a lack of strong evidence to suggest a superior technique. Advances in cataract surgery expand patient eligibility for successful cataract extraction, benefitting a growing population of pseudophakic patients. However, i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02290-5 |
_version_ | 1784645788073197568 |
---|---|
author | Zyablitskaya, Mariya Hong, Estee Chen, Royce W. S. Chang, Stanley Suh, Leejee H. |
author_facet | Zyablitskaya, Mariya Hong, Estee Chen, Royce W. S. Chang, Stanley Suh, Leejee H. |
author_sort | Zyablitskaya, Mariya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While each scleral fixation method has its own advantages, there is a lack of strong evidence to suggest a superior technique. Advances in cataract surgery expand patient eligibility for successful cataract extraction, benefitting a growing population of pseudophakic patients. However, implantation of secondary intraocular lens (IOL) with compromised anterior or posterior capsule is a more challenging task. Each method of scleral fixation has its own advantages and none of them has strong evidence to be superior. This paper describes postsurgical outcomes of two scleral intraocular(IOL) fixation techniques combined with pars plana vitrectomy(PPV) from a single tertiary referral eye center. METHODS: Patients underwent PPV and IOL implantation with either four-point sutured scleral fixation (Akreos AO60(AK); n = 24) or two-point sutureless flanged intrascleral fixation (CT Lucia(CTL); n = 7). Reports include IOL and sclerotomy placement, fixation techniques, and IOL model. RESULTS: Thirty-one eyes of thirty patients were analyzed. Average change in vision from baseline measurement was LogMAR − 0.68 ± 0.66 and − 0.90 ± 0.63 for AK and CTL groups, respectively. Average postoperative refractive error was − 0.3 ± 1.03 D (AK) and 0.4 ± 0.60 D (CTL). No opacification cases of Akreos lens were found in this study with the longest follow up of 53 months. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods of implantation (sutured and sutureless) could provide good visual and refractive outcomes. Minimal complication rates were reported despite including patients with multiple comorbidities, making both techniques an attractive choice for secondary IOL implantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8818229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88182292022-02-07 Outcomes of four-point suture fixated and two-point sutureless posterior chamber IOLs combined with pars plana vitrectomy Zyablitskaya, Mariya Hong, Estee Chen, Royce W. S. Chang, Stanley Suh, Leejee H. BMC Ophthalmol Research BACKGROUND: While each scleral fixation method has its own advantages, there is a lack of strong evidence to suggest a superior technique. Advances in cataract surgery expand patient eligibility for successful cataract extraction, benefitting a growing population of pseudophakic patients. However, implantation of secondary intraocular lens (IOL) with compromised anterior or posterior capsule is a more challenging task. Each method of scleral fixation has its own advantages and none of them has strong evidence to be superior. This paper describes postsurgical outcomes of two scleral intraocular(IOL) fixation techniques combined with pars plana vitrectomy(PPV) from a single tertiary referral eye center. METHODS: Patients underwent PPV and IOL implantation with either four-point sutured scleral fixation (Akreos AO60(AK); n = 24) or two-point sutureless flanged intrascleral fixation (CT Lucia(CTL); n = 7). Reports include IOL and sclerotomy placement, fixation techniques, and IOL model. RESULTS: Thirty-one eyes of thirty patients were analyzed. Average change in vision from baseline measurement was LogMAR − 0.68 ± 0.66 and − 0.90 ± 0.63 for AK and CTL groups, respectively. Average postoperative refractive error was − 0.3 ± 1.03 D (AK) and 0.4 ± 0.60 D (CTL). No opacification cases of Akreos lens were found in this study with the longest follow up of 53 months. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods of implantation (sutured and sutureless) could provide good visual and refractive outcomes. Minimal complication rates were reported despite including patients with multiple comorbidities, making both techniques an attractive choice for secondary IOL implantation. BioMed Central 2022-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8818229/ /pubmed/35123431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02290-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zyablitskaya, Mariya Hong, Estee Chen, Royce W. S. Chang, Stanley Suh, Leejee H. Outcomes of four-point suture fixated and two-point sutureless posterior chamber IOLs combined with pars plana vitrectomy |
title | Outcomes of four-point suture fixated and two-point sutureless posterior chamber IOLs combined with pars plana vitrectomy |
title_full | Outcomes of four-point suture fixated and two-point sutureless posterior chamber IOLs combined with pars plana vitrectomy |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of four-point suture fixated and two-point sutureless posterior chamber IOLs combined with pars plana vitrectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of four-point suture fixated and two-point sutureless posterior chamber IOLs combined with pars plana vitrectomy |
title_short | Outcomes of four-point suture fixated and two-point sutureless posterior chamber IOLs combined with pars plana vitrectomy |
title_sort | outcomes of four-point suture fixated and two-point sutureless posterior chamber iols combined with pars plana vitrectomy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02290-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zyablitskayamariya outcomesoffourpointsuturefixatedandtwopointsuturelessposteriorchamberiolscombinedwithparsplanavitrectomy AT hongestee outcomesoffourpointsuturefixatedandtwopointsuturelessposteriorchamberiolscombinedwithparsplanavitrectomy AT chenroycews outcomesoffourpointsuturefixatedandtwopointsuturelessposteriorchamberiolscombinedwithparsplanavitrectomy AT changstanley outcomesoffourpointsuturefixatedandtwopointsuturelessposteriorchamberiolscombinedwithparsplanavitrectomy AT suhleejeeh outcomesoffourpointsuturefixatedandtwopointsuturelessposteriorchamberiolscombinedwithparsplanavitrectomy |