Cargando…

Evaluation of MR-derived simulated CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared to conventional radiography in patients with shoulder pain: a proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic value of MR-derived CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared with conventional radiographs in patients with suspected shoulder pathology. METHODS: 3 T MRI of the shoulder including a 3D T1-weighted gradient echo sequence was performed in 25 patients (m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feuerriegel, Georg C., Kopp, Felix K., Pfeiffer, Daniela, Pogorzelski, Jonas, Wurm, Markus, Leonhardt, Yannik, Boehm, Christof, Kronthaler, Sophia, Karampinos, Dimitrios C., Neumann, Jan, Schwaiger, Benedikt J., Makowski, Marcus R., Woertler, Klaus, Gersing, Alexandra S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05076-4
_version_ 1784645791739019264
author Feuerriegel, Georg C.
Kopp, Felix K.
Pfeiffer, Daniela
Pogorzelski, Jonas
Wurm, Markus
Leonhardt, Yannik
Boehm, Christof
Kronthaler, Sophia
Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
Neumann, Jan
Schwaiger, Benedikt J.
Makowski, Marcus R.
Woertler, Klaus
Gersing, Alexandra S.
author_facet Feuerriegel, Georg C.
Kopp, Felix K.
Pfeiffer, Daniela
Pogorzelski, Jonas
Wurm, Markus
Leonhardt, Yannik
Boehm, Christof
Kronthaler, Sophia
Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
Neumann, Jan
Schwaiger, Benedikt J.
Makowski, Marcus R.
Woertler, Klaus
Gersing, Alexandra S.
author_sort Feuerriegel, Georg C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic value of MR-derived CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared with conventional radiographs in patients with suspected shoulder pathology. METHODS: 3 T MRI of the shoulder including a 3D T1-weighted gradient echo sequence was performed in 25 patients (mean age 52.4 ± 18 years, 13 women) with suspected shoulder pathology. Subsequently a cone-beam forward projection algorithm was used to obtain intensity-inverted CT-like images and simulated radiographs. Two radiologists evaluated the simulated images separately and independently using the conventional radiographs as the standard of reference, including measurements of the image quality, acromiohumeral distance, critical shoulder angle, degenerative joint changes and the acromial type. Additionally, the CT-like MR images were evaluated for glenoid defects, subcortical cysts and calcifications. Agreement between the MR-derived simulated radiographs and conventional radiographs was calculated using Cohen’s Kappa. RESULTS: Measurements on simulated radiographs and conventional radiographs overall showed a substantial to almost perfect inter- and intra-rater agreement (κ = 0.69–1.00 and κ = 0.65–0.85, respectively). Image quality of the simulated radiographs was rated good to excellent (1.6 ± 0.7 and 1.8 ± 0.6, respectively) by the radiologists. A substantial agreement was found regarding diagnostically relevant features, assessed on Y- and anteroposterior projections (κ = 0.84 and κ = 0.69 for the measurement of the CSA; κ = 0.95 and κ = 0.60 for the measurement of the AHD; κ = 0.77 and κ = 0.77 for grading of the Samilson-Prieto classification; κ = 0.83 and κ = 0.67 for the grading of the Bigliani classification, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this proof-of-concept study, clinically relevant features of the shoulder joint were assessed reliably using MR-derived CT-like images and simulated radiographs with an image quality equivalent to conventional radiographs. MR-derived CT-like images and simulated radiographs may provide useful diagnostic information while reducing the amount of radiation exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8818249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88182492022-02-07 Evaluation of MR-derived simulated CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared to conventional radiography in patients with shoulder pain: a proof-of-concept study Feuerriegel, Georg C. Kopp, Felix K. Pfeiffer, Daniela Pogorzelski, Jonas Wurm, Markus Leonhardt, Yannik Boehm, Christof Kronthaler, Sophia Karampinos, Dimitrios C. Neumann, Jan Schwaiger, Benedikt J. Makowski, Marcus R. Woertler, Klaus Gersing, Alexandra S. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic value of MR-derived CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared with conventional radiographs in patients with suspected shoulder pathology. METHODS: 3 T MRI of the shoulder including a 3D T1-weighted gradient echo sequence was performed in 25 patients (mean age 52.4 ± 18 years, 13 women) with suspected shoulder pathology. Subsequently a cone-beam forward projection algorithm was used to obtain intensity-inverted CT-like images and simulated radiographs. Two radiologists evaluated the simulated images separately and independently using the conventional radiographs as the standard of reference, including measurements of the image quality, acromiohumeral distance, critical shoulder angle, degenerative joint changes and the acromial type. Additionally, the CT-like MR images were evaluated for glenoid defects, subcortical cysts and calcifications. Agreement between the MR-derived simulated radiographs and conventional radiographs was calculated using Cohen’s Kappa. RESULTS: Measurements on simulated radiographs and conventional radiographs overall showed a substantial to almost perfect inter- and intra-rater agreement (κ = 0.69–1.00 and κ = 0.65–0.85, respectively). Image quality of the simulated radiographs was rated good to excellent (1.6 ± 0.7 and 1.8 ± 0.6, respectively) by the radiologists. A substantial agreement was found regarding diagnostically relevant features, assessed on Y- and anteroposterior projections (κ = 0.84 and κ = 0.69 for the measurement of the CSA; κ = 0.95 and κ = 0.60 for the measurement of the AHD; κ = 0.77 and κ = 0.77 for grading of the Samilson-Prieto classification; κ = 0.83 and κ = 0.67 for the grading of the Bigliani classification, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this proof-of-concept study, clinically relevant features of the shoulder joint were assessed reliably using MR-derived CT-like images and simulated radiographs with an image quality equivalent to conventional radiographs. MR-derived CT-like images and simulated radiographs may provide useful diagnostic information while reducing the amount of radiation exposure. BioMed Central 2022-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8818249/ /pubmed/35123466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05076-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Feuerriegel, Georg C.
Kopp, Felix K.
Pfeiffer, Daniela
Pogorzelski, Jonas
Wurm, Markus
Leonhardt, Yannik
Boehm, Christof
Kronthaler, Sophia
Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
Neumann, Jan
Schwaiger, Benedikt J.
Makowski, Marcus R.
Woertler, Klaus
Gersing, Alexandra S.
Evaluation of MR-derived simulated CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared to conventional radiography in patients with shoulder pain: a proof-of-concept study
title Evaluation of MR-derived simulated CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared to conventional radiography in patients with shoulder pain: a proof-of-concept study
title_full Evaluation of MR-derived simulated CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared to conventional radiography in patients with shoulder pain: a proof-of-concept study
title_fullStr Evaluation of MR-derived simulated CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared to conventional radiography in patients with shoulder pain: a proof-of-concept study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of MR-derived simulated CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared to conventional radiography in patients with shoulder pain: a proof-of-concept study
title_short Evaluation of MR-derived simulated CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared to conventional radiography in patients with shoulder pain: a proof-of-concept study
title_sort evaluation of mr-derived simulated ct-like images and simulated radiographs compared to conventional radiography in patients with shoulder pain: a proof-of-concept study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05076-4
work_keys_str_mv AT feuerriegelgeorgc evaluationofmrderivedsimulatedctlikeimagesandsimulatedradiographscomparedtoconventionalradiographyinpatientswithshoulderpainaproofofconceptstudy
AT koppfelixk evaluationofmrderivedsimulatedctlikeimagesandsimulatedradiographscomparedtoconventionalradiographyinpatientswithshoulderpainaproofofconceptstudy
AT pfeifferdaniela evaluationofmrderivedsimulatedctlikeimagesandsimulatedradiographscomparedtoconventionalradiographyinpatientswithshoulderpainaproofofconceptstudy
AT pogorzelskijonas evaluationofmrderivedsimulatedctlikeimagesandsimulatedradiographscomparedtoconventionalradiographyinpatientswithshoulderpainaproofofconceptstudy
AT wurmmarkus evaluationofmrderivedsimulatedctlikeimagesandsimulatedradiographscomparedtoconventionalradiographyinpatientswithshoulderpainaproofofconceptstudy
AT leonhardtyannik evaluationofmrderivedsimulatedctlikeimagesandsimulatedradiographscomparedtoconventionalradiographyinpatientswithshoulderpainaproofofconceptstudy
AT boehmchristof evaluationofmrderivedsimulatedctlikeimagesandsimulatedradiographscomparedtoconventionalradiographyinpatientswithshoulderpainaproofofconceptstudy
AT kronthalersophia evaluationofmrderivedsimulatedctlikeimagesandsimulatedradiographscomparedtoconventionalradiographyinpatientswithshoulderpainaproofofconceptstudy
AT karampinosdimitriosc evaluationofmrderivedsimulatedctlikeimagesandsimulatedradiographscomparedtoconventionalradiographyinpatientswithshoulderpainaproofofconceptstudy
AT neumannjan evaluationofmrderivedsimulatedctlikeimagesandsimulatedradiographscomparedtoconventionalradiographyinpatientswithshoulderpainaproofofconceptstudy
AT schwaigerbenediktj evaluationofmrderivedsimulatedctlikeimagesandsimulatedradiographscomparedtoconventionalradiographyinpatientswithshoulderpainaproofofconceptstudy
AT makowskimarcusr evaluationofmrderivedsimulatedctlikeimagesandsimulatedradiographscomparedtoconventionalradiographyinpatientswithshoulderpainaproofofconceptstudy
AT woertlerklaus evaluationofmrderivedsimulatedctlikeimagesandsimulatedradiographscomparedtoconventionalradiographyinpatientswithshoulderpainaproofofconceptstudy
AT gersingalexandras evaluationofmrderivedsimulatedctlikeimagesandsimulatedradiographscomparedtoconventionalradiographyinpatientswithshoulderpainaproofofconceptstudy