Cargando…

Intake of artificial sweeteners among adults is associated with reduced odds of gastrointestinal luminal cancers: a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies

The association between artificial sweetener (AS) consumption and the risk of organ-specific cancers has been debated for decades. We hypothesized that AS consumption is associated with reduced risk of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. We aimed to test this hypothesis by conducting a systematic review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tepler, Adam, Hoffman, Gila, Jindal, Shawn, Narula, Neeraj, Shah, Shailja C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34461350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2021.07.007
_version_ 1784645800557543424
author Tepler, Adam
Hoffman, Gila
Jindal, Shawn
Narula, Neeraj
Shah, Shailja C.
author_facet Tepler, Adam
Hoffman, Gila
Jindal, Shawn
Narula, Neeraj
Shah, Shailja C.
author_sort Tepler, Adam
collection PubMed
description The association between artificial sweetener (AS) consumption and the risk of organ-specific cancers has been debated for decades. We hypothesized that AS consumption is associated with reduced risk of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. We aimed to test this hypothesis by conducting a systematic review with meta-analysis of the association between AS and GI cancers. We searched four databases for comparative studies of AS consumption (exposed) versus no consumption (nonexposed) and the odds or risk of GI luminal or non-luminal cancer (primary outcome). Estimates were pooled using a random-effects model. Studies were evaluated for quality, bias, and heterogeneity. We analyzed 8 (4 prospective, 4 case-control) studies comprising data on 1,043,496 individuals, among whom 3271 pancreatic, 395 gastric, 304 esophageal, 3008 colorectal, and 598 oropharyngeal cancers occurred. While there was no significant association between AS consumption and odds of GI cancer overall, AS consumption was associated with 19% reduced likelihood of luminal GI cancer (OR 0.81, 95% CI:0.68–0.97). There was no association between AS consumption and non-luminal GI cancer. Meta-regression demonstrated no difference in effect estimates based on study type. Based on this first meta-analysis of AS and GI cancer, we demonstrated that AS consumption is associated with a significantly lower likelihood of luminal, but not non-luminal, GI cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8818300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88183002022-09-01 Intake of artificial sweeteners among adults is associated with reduced odds of gastrointestinal luminal cancers: a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies Tepler, Adam Hoffman, Gila Jindal, Shawn Narula, Neeraj Shah, Shailja C. Nutr Res Article The association between artificial sweetener (AS) consumption and the risk of organ-specific cancers has been debated for decades. We hypothesized that AS consumption is associated with reduced risk of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. We aimed to test this hypothesis by conducting a systematic review with meta-analysis of the association between AS and GI cancers. We searched four databases for comparative studies of AS consumption (exposed) versus no consumption (nonexposed) and the odds or risk of GI luminal or non-luminal cancer (primary outcome). Estimates were pooled using a random-effects model. Studies were evaluated for quality, bias, and heterogeneity. We analyzed 8 (4 prospective, 4 case-control) studies comprising data on 1,043,496 individuals, among whom 3271 pancreatic, 395 gastric, 304 esophageal, 3008 colorectal, and 598 oropharyngeal cancers occurred. While there was no significant association between AS consumption and odds of GI cancer overall, AS consumption was associated with 19% reduced likelihood of luminal GI cancer (OR 0.81, 95% CI:0.68–0.97). There was no association between AS consumption and non-luminal GI cancer. Meta-regression demonstrated no difference in effect estimates based on study type. Based on this first meta-analysis of AS and GI cancer, we demonstrated that AS consumption is associated with a significantly lower likelihood of luminal, but not non-luminal, GI cancer. 2021-09 2021-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8818300/ /pubmed/34461350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2021.07.007 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2021.07.007
spellingShingle Article
Tepler, Adam
Hoffman, Gila
Jindal, Shawn
Narula, Neeraj
Shah, Shailja C.
Intake of artificial sweeteners among adults is associated with reduced odds of gastrointestinal luminal cancers: a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies
title Intake of artificial sweeteners among adults is associated with reduced odds of gastrointestinal luminal cancers: a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies
title_full Intake of artificial sweeteners among adults is associated with reduced odds of gastrointestinal luminal cancers: a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies
title_fullStr Intake of artificial sweeteners among adults is associated with reduced odds of gastrointestinal luminal cancers: a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies
title_full_unstemmed Intake of artificial sweeteners among adults is associated with reduced odds of gastrointestinal luminal cancers: a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies
title_short Intake of artificial sweeteners among adults is associated with reduced odds of gastrointestinal luminal cancers: a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies
title_sort intake of artificial sweeteners among adults is associated with reduced odds of gastrointestinal luminal cancers: a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34461350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2021.07.007
work_keys_str_mv AT tepleradam intakeofartificialsweetenersamongadultsisassociatedwithreducedoddsofgastrointestinalluminalcancersametaanalysisofcohortandcasecontrolstudies
AT hoffmangila intakeofartificialsweetenersamongadultsisassociatedwithreducedoddsofgastrointestinalluminalcancersametaanalysisofcohortandcasecontrolstudies
AT jindalshawn intakeofartificialsweetenersamongadultsisassociatedwithreducedoddsofgastrointestinalluminalcancersametaanalysisofcohortandcasecontrolstudies
AT narulaneeraj intakeofartificialsweetenersamongadultsisassociatedwithreducedoddsofgastrointestinalluminalcancersametaanalysisofcohortandcasecontrolstudies
AT shahshailjac intakeofartificialsweetenersamongadultsisassociatedwithreducedoddsofgastrointestinalluminalcancersametaanalysisofcohortandcasecontrolstudies