Cargando…

WSSNet: Aortic Wall Shear Stress Estimation Using Deep Learning on 4D Flow MRI

Wall shear stress (WSS) is an important contributor to vessel wall remodeling and atherosclerosis. However, image-based WSS estimation from 4D Flow MRI underestimates true WSS values, and the accuracy is dependent on spatial resolution, which is limited in 4D Flow MRI. To address this, we present a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferdian, Edward, Dubowitz, David J., Mauger, Charlene A., Wang, Alan, Young, Alistair A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35141290
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.769927
_version_ 1784645889561722880
author Ferdian, Edward
Dubowitz, David J.
Mauger, Charlene A.
Wang, Alan
Young, Alistair A.
author_facet Ferdian, Edward
Dubowitz, David J.
Mauger, Charlene A.
Wang, Alan
Young, Alistair A.
author_sort Ferdian, Edward
collection PubMed
description Wall shear stress (WSS) is an important contributor to vessel wall remodeling and atherosclerosis. However, image-based WSS estimation from 4D Flow MRI underestimates true WSS values, and the accuracy is dependent on spatial resolution, which is limited in 4D Flow MRI. To address this, we present a deep learning algorithm (WSSNet) to estimate WSS trained on aortic computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The 3D CFD velocity and coordinate point clouds were resampled into a 2D template of 48 × 93 points at two inward distances (randomly varied from 0.3 to 2.0 mm) from the vessel surface (“velocity sheets”). The algorithm was trained on 37 patient-specific geometries and velocity sheets. Results from 6 validation and test cases showed high accuracy against CFD WSS (mean absolute error 0.55 ± 0.60 Pa, relative error 4.34 ± 4.14%, 0.92 ± 0.05 Pearson correlation) and noisy synthetic 4D Flow MRI at 2.4 mm resolution (mean absolute error 0.99 ± 0.91 Pa, relative error 7.13 ± 6.27%, and 0.79 ± 0.10 Pearson correlation). Furthermore, the method was applied on in vivo 4D Flow MRI cases, effectively estimating WSS from standard clinical images. Compared with the existing parabolic fitting method, WSSNet estimates showed 2–3 × higher values, closer to CFD, and a Pearson correlation of 0.68 ± 0.12. This approach, considering both geometric and velocity information from the image, is capable of estimating spatiotemporal WSS with varying image resolution, and is more accurate than existing methods while still preserving the correct WSS pattern distribution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8818720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88187202022-02-08 WSSNet: Aortic Wall Shear Stress Estimation Using Deep Learning on 4D Flow MRI Ferdian, Edward Dubowitz, David J. Mauger, Charlene A. Wang, Alan Young, Alistair A. Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Wall shear stress (WSS) is an important contributor to vessel wall remodeling and atherosclerosis. However, image-based WSS estimation from 4D Flow MRI underestimates true WSS values, and the accuracy is dependent on spatial resolution, which is limited in 4D Flow MRI. To address this, we present a deep learning algorithm (WSSNet) to estimate WSS trained on aortic computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The 3D CFD velocity and coordinate point clouds were resampled into a 2D template of 48 × 93 points at two inward distances (randomly varied from 0.3 to 2.0 mm) from the vessel surface (“velocity sheets”). The algorithm was trained on 37 patient-specific geometries and velocity sheets. Results from 6 validation and test cases showed high accuracy against CFD WSS (mean absolute error 0.55 ± 0.60 Pa, relative error 4.34 ± 4.14%, 0.92 ± 0.05 Pearson correlation) and noisy synthetic 4D Flow MRI at 2.4 mm resolution (mean absolute error 0.99 ± 0.91 Pa, relative error 7.13 ± 6.27%, and 0.79 ± 0.10 Pearson correlation). Furthermore, the method was applied on in vivo 4D Flow MRI cases, effectively estimating WSS from standard clinical images. Compared with the existing parabolic fitting method, WSSNet estimates showed 2–3 × higher values, closer to CFD, and a Pearson correlation of 0.68 ± 0.12. This approach, considering both geometric and velocity information from the image, is capable of estimating spatiotemporal WSS with varying image resolution, and is more accurate than existing methods while still preserving the correct WSS pattern distribution. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8818720/ /pubmed/35141290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.769927 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ferdian, Dubowitz, Mauger, Wang and Young. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Ferdian, Edward
Dubowitz, David J.
Mauger, Charlene A.
Wang, Alan
Young, Alistair A.
WSSNet: Aortic Wall Shear Stress Estimation Using Deep Learning on 4D Flow MRI
title WSSNet: Aortic Wall Shear Stress Estimation Using Deep Learning on 4D Flow MRI
title_full WSSNet: Aortic Wall Shear Stress Estimation Using Deep Learning on 4D Flow MRI
title_fullStr WSSNet: Aortic Wall Shear Stress Estimation Using Deep Learning on 4D Flow MRI
title_full_unstemmed WSSNet: Aortic Wall Shear Stress Estimation Using Deep Learning on 4D Flow MRI
title_short WSSNet: Aortic Wall Shear Stress Estimation Using Deep Learning on 4D Flow MRI
title_sort wssnet: aortic wall shear stress estimation using deep learning on 4d flow mri
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35141290
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.769927
work_keys_str_mv AT ferdianedward wssnetaorticwallshearstressestimationusingdeeplearningon4dflowmri
AT dubowitzdavidj wssnetaorticwallshearstressestimationusingdeeplearningon4dflowmri
AT maugercharlenea wssnetaorticwallshearstressestimationusingdeeplearningon4dflowmri
AT wangalan wssnetaorticwallshearstressestimationusingdeeplearningon4dflowmri
AT youngalistaira wssnetaorticwallshearstressestimationusingdeeplearningon4dflowmri