Cargando…
Contribution of Cervical Proprioception, Vision, and Vestibular Feedback on Reducing Dynamic Head–Trunk Orientation Error in the Yaw Direction
The contribution of cervical proprioception, vision, and vestibular feedback to the dynamic head–trunk orientation error in the yaw direction was investigated to further the understanding over the mechanism of coordination among different sensory modalities for dynamic head–trunk orientation. To tes...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35140583 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.774448 |
_version_ | 1784645923267149824 |
---|---|
author | Mooti, Rami Park, Hangue |
author_facet | Mooti, Rami Park, Hangue |
author_sort | Mooti, Rami |
collection | PubMed |
description | The contribution of cervical proprioception, vision, and vestibular feedback to the dynamic head–trunk orientation error in the yaw direction was investigated to further the understanding over the mechanism of coordination among different sensory modalities for dynamic head–trunk orientation. To test the contribution of each sensory modality, individually and together, to dynamic head–trunk orientation, 10 healthy human subjects participated in the extended cervical joint position error test, measuring the ability of repositioning the head back to the reference orientation after 45° yaw rotation of head or trunk. The error between initial and returned angles was measured. The test was repeated under eight different conditions of sensory feedback, with or without each of three sensory modalities. Each subject completed 64 trials (8 per condition) in a random order for fair comparison. No change was found in bias when one of the three modalities was missing, while variance was largest at the lack of dynamic cervical proprioception. When two of the three modalities were missing (i.e., one of the three modalities was present), both bias and variance were minimum at the presence of cervical proprioception. Additionally, both visual and vestibular feedback was redundant (i.e., no further improvement in both bias and variance), if the other one (visual or vestibular feedback) was present with dynamic cervical proprioception. In sum, the experimental results suggest that dynamic cervical proprioception is the most significant sensory modality for reducing the dynamic head–trunk orientation error in the yaw direction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8818861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88188612022-02-08 Contribution of Cervical Proprioception, Vision, and Vestibular Feedback on Reducing Dynamic Head–Trunk Orientation Error in the Yaw Direction Mooti, Rami Park, Hangue Front Neurosci Neuroscience The contribution of cervical proprioception, vision, and vestibular feedback to the dynamic head–trunk orientation error in the yaw direction was investigated to further the understanding over the mechanism of coordination among different sensory modalities for dynamic head–trunk orientation. To test the contribution of each sensory modality, individually and together, to dynamic head–trunk orientation, 10 healthy human subjects participated in the extended cervical joint position error test, measuring the ability of repositioning the head back to the reference orientation after 45° yaw rotation of head or trunk. The error between initial and returned angles was measured. The test was repeated under eight different conditions of sensory feedback, with or without each of three sensory modalities. Each subject completed 64 trials (8 per condition) in a random order for fair comparison. No change was found in bias when one of the three modalities was missing, while variance was largest at the lack of dynamic cervical proprioception. When two of the three modalities were missing (i.e., one of the three modalities was present), both bias and variance were minimum at the presence of cervical proprioception. Additionally, both visual and vestibular feedback was redundant (i.e., no further improvement in both bias and variance), if the other one (visual or vestibular feedback) was present with dynamic cervical proprioception. In sum, the experimental results suggest that dynamic cervical proprioception is the most significant sensory modality for reducing the dynamic head–trunk orientation error in the yaw direction. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8818861/ /pubmed/35140583 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.774448 Text en Copyright © 2022 Mooti and Park. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Mooti, Rami Park, Hangue Contribution of Cervical Proprioception, Vision, and Vestibular Feedback on Reducing Dynamic Head–Trunk Orientation Error in the Yaw Direction |
title | Contribution of Cervical Proprioception, Vision, and Vestibular Feedback on Reducing Dynamic Head–Trunk Orientation Error in the Yaw Direction |
title_full | Contribution of Cervical Proprioception, Vision, and Vestibular Feedback on Reducing Dynamic Head–Trunk Orientation Error in the Yaw Direction |
title_fullStr | Contribution of Cervical Proprioception, Vision, and Vestibular Feedback on Reducing Dynamic Head–Trunk Orientation Error in the Yaw Direction |
title_full_unstemmed | Contribution of Cervical Proprioception, Vision, and Vestibular Feedback on Reducing Dynamic Head–Trunk Orientation Error in the Yaw Direction |
title_short | Contribution of Cervical Proprioception, Vision, and Vestibular Feedback on Reducing Dynamic Head–Trunk Orientation Error in the Yaw Direction |
title_sort | contribution of cervical proprioception, vision, and vestibular feedback on reducing dynamic head–trunk orientation error in the yaw direction |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8818861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35140583 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.774448 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mootirami contributionofcervicalproprioceptionvisionandvestibularfeedbackonreducingdynamicheadtrunkorientationerrorintheyawdirection AT parkhangue contributionofcervicalproprioceptionvisionandvestibularfeedbackonreducingdynamicheadtrunkorientationerrorintheyawdirection |