Cargando…

Climbing-Specific Exercise Tests: Energy System Contributions and Relationships With Sport Performance

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate distinct performance indicators and energy system contributions in 3 different, new sport-specific finger flexor muscle exercise tests. METHODS: The tests included the maximal strength test, the all-out test (30 s) as well as the continuous and intermitt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maciejczyk, Marcin, Michailov, Michail Lubomirov, Wiecek, Magdalena, Szymura, Jadwiga, Rokowski, Robert, Szygula, Zbigniew, Beneke, Ralph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35140627
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.787902
_version_ 1784645977517326336
author Maciejczyk, Marcin
Michailov, Michail Lubomirov
Wiecek, Magdalena
Szymura, Jadwiga
Rokowski, Robert
Szygula, Zbigniew
Beneke, Ralph
author_facet Maciejczyk, Marcin
Michailov, Michail Lubomirov
Wiecek, Magdalena
Szymura, Jadwiga
Rokowski, Robert
Szygula, Zbigniew
Beneke, Ralph
author_sort Maciejczyk, Marcin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate distinct performance indicators and energy system contributions in 3 different, new sport-specific finger flexor muscle exercise tests. METHODS: The tests included the maximal strength test, the all-out test (30 s) as well as the continuous and intermittent muscle endurance test at an intensity equaling 60% of maximal force, which were performed until target force could not be maintained. Gas exchange and blood lactate were measured in 13 experienced climbers during, as well as pre and post the test. The energy contribution (anaerobic alactic, anaerobic lactic, and aerobic) was determined for each test. RESULTS: The contribution of aerobic metabolism was highest during the intermittent test (59.9 ± 12.0%). During continuous exercise, this was 28.1 ± 15.6%, and in the all-out test, this was 19.4 ± 8.1%. The contribution of anaerobic alactic energy was 27.2 ± 10.0% (intermittent), 54.2 ± 18.3% (continuous), and 62.4 ± 11.3% (all-out), while anaerobic lactic contribution equaled 12.9 ± 6.4, 17.7 ± 8.9, and 18.2 ± 9.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combined analysis of performance predictors and metabolic profiles of the climbing test battery indicated that not only maximal grip force, but also all-out isometric contractions are equally decisive physical performance indices of climbing performance. Maximal grip force reflects maximal anaerobic power, while all-out average force and force time integral of constant isometric contraction at 60% of maximal force are functional measures of anaerobic capacity. Aerobic energy demand for the intermittent exercise is dominated aerobic re-phosphorylation of high-energy phosphates. The force-time integral from the intermittent test was not decisive for climbing performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8819085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88190852022-02-08 Climbing-Specific Exercise Tests: Energy System Contributions and Relationships With Sport Performance Maciejczyk, Marcin Michailov, Michail Lubomirov Wiecek, Magdalena Szymura, Jadwiga Rokowski, Robert Szygula, Zbigniew Beneke, Ralph Front Physiol Physiology PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate distinct performance indicators and energy system contributions in 3 different, new sport-specific finger flexor muscle exercise tests. METHODS: The tests included the maximal strength test, the all-out test (30 s) as well as the continuous and intermittent muscle endurance test at an intensity equaling 60% of maximal force, which were performed until target force could not be maintained. Gas exchange and blood lactate were measured in 13 experienced climbers during, as well as pre and post the test. The energy contribution (anaerobic alactic, anaerobic lactic, and aerobic) was determined for each test. RESULTS: The contribution of aerobic metabolism was highest during the intermittent test (59.9 ± 12.0%). During continuous exercise, this was 28.1 ± 15.6%, and in the all-out test, this was 19.4 ± 8.1%. The contribution of anaerobic alactic energy was 27.2 ± 10.0% (intermittent), 54.2 ± 18.3% (continuous), and 62.4 ± 11.3% (all-out), while anaerobic lactic contribution equaled 12.9 ± 6.4, 17.7 ± 8.9, and 18.2 ± 9.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combined analysis of performance predictors and metabolic profiles of the climbing test battery indicated that not only maximal grip force, but also all-out isometric contractions are equally decisive physical performance indices of climbing performance. Maximal grip force reflects maximal anaerobic power, while all-out average force and force time integral of constant isometric contraction at 60% of maximal force are functional measures of anaerobic capacity. Aerobic energy demand for the intermittent exercise is dominated aerobic re-phosphorylation of high-energy phosphates. The force-time integral from the intermittent test was not decisive for climbing performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8819085/ /pubmed/35140627 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.787902 Text en Copyright © 2022 Maciejczyk, Michailov, Wiecek, Szymura, Rokowski, Szygula and Beneke. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Maciejczyk, Marcin
Michailov, Michail Lubomirov
Wiecek, Magdalena
Szymura, Jadwiga
Rokowski, Robert
Szygula, Zbigniew
Beneke, Ralph
Climbing-Specific Exercise Tests: Energy System Contributions and Relationships With Sport Performance
title Climbing-Specific Exercise Tests: Energy System Contributions and Relationships With Sport Performance
title_full Climbing-Specific Exercise Tests: Energy System Contributions and Relationships With Sport Performance
title_fullStr Climbing-Specific Exercise Tests: Energy System Contributions and Relationships With Sport Performance
title_full_unstemmed Climbing-Specific Exercise Tests: Energy System Contributions and Relationships With Sport Performance
title_short Climbing-Specific Exercise Tests: Energy System Contributions and Relationships With Sport Performance
title_sort climbing-specific exercise tests: energy system contributions and relationships with sport performance
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35140627
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.787902
work_keys_str_mv AT maciejczykmarcin climbingspecificexercisetestsenergysystemcontributionsandrelationshipswithsportperformance
AT michailovmichaillubomirov climbingspecificexercisetestsenergysystemcontributionsandrelationshipswithsportperformance
AT wiecekmagdalena climbingspecificexercisetestsenergysystemcontributionsandrelationshipswithsportperformance
AT szymurajadwiga climbingspecificexercisetestsenergysystemcontributionsandrelationshipswithsportperformance
AT rokowskirobert climbingspecificexercisetestsenergysystemcontributionsandrelationshipswithsportperformance
AT szygulazbigniew climbingspecificexercisetestsenergysystemcontributionsandrelationshipswithsportperformance
AT benekeralph climbingspecificexercisetestsenergysystemcontributionsandrelationshipswithsportperformance