Cargando…

Trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (GOG 281/LOGS): an international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial

BACKGROUND: Low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum is characterised by MAPK pathway aberrations and its reduced sensitivity to chemotherapy relative to high-grade serous carcinoma. We compared the MEK inhibitor trametinib to physician's choice standard of care in patients with re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gershenson, David M, Miller, Austin, Brady, William E, Paul, James, Carty, Karen, Rodgers, William, Millan, David, Coleman, Robert L, Moore, Kathleen N, Banerjee, Susana, Connolly, Kate, Secord, Angeles Alvarez, O'Malley, David M, Dorigo, Oliver, Gaillard, Stephanie, Gabra, Hani, Slomovitz, Brian, Hanjani, Parviz, Farley, John, Churchman, Michael, Ewing, Ailith, Hollis, Robert L, Herrington, C Simon, Huang, Helen Q, Wenzel, Lari, Gourley, Charlie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02175-9
_version_ 1784646023177568256
author Gershenson, David M
Miller, Austin
Brady, William E
Paul, James
Carty, Karen
Rodgers, William
Millan, David
Coleman, Robert L
Moore, Kathleen N
Banerjee, Susana
Connolly, Kate
Secord, Angeles Alvarez
O'Malley, David M
Dorigo, Oliver
Gaillard, Stephanie
Gabra, Hani
Slomovitz, Brian
Hanjani, Parviz
Farley, John
Churchman, Michael
Ewing, Ailith
Hollis, Robert L
Herrington, C Simon
Huang, Helen Q
Wenzel, Lari
Gourley, Charlie
author_facet Gershenson, David M
Miller, Austin
Brady, William E
Paul, James
Carty, Karen
Rodgers, William
Millan, David
Coleman, Robert L
Moore, Kathleen N
Banerjee, Susana
Connolly, Kate
Secord, Angeles Alvarez
O'Malley, David M
Dorigo, Oliver
Gaillard, Stephanie
Gabra, Hani
Slomovitz, Brian
Hanjani, Parviz
Farley, John
Churchman, Michael
Ewing, Ailith
Hollis, Robert L
Herrington, C Simon
Huang, Helen Q
Wenzel, Lari
Gourley, Charlie
author_sort Gershenson, David M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum is characterised by MAPK pathway aberrations and its reduced sensitivity to chemotherapy relative to high-grade serous carcinoma. We compared the MEK inhibitor trametinib to physician's choice standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma. METHODS: This international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial was done at 84 hospitals in the USA and UK. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma and measurable disease, as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1, had received at least one platinum-based regimen, but not all five standard-of-care drugs, and had received an unlimited number of previous regimens. Patients with serous borderline tumours or tumours containing low-grade serous and high-grade serous carcinoma were excluded. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oral trametinib 2 mg once daily (trametinib group) or one of five standard-of-care treatment options (standard-of-care group): intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) by body surface area on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle; intravenous pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40–50 mg/m(2) by body surface area once every 4 weeks; intravenous topotecan 4 mg/m(2) by body surface area on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle; oral letrozole 2·5 mg once daily; or oral tamoxifen 20 mg twice daily. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region (USA or UK), number of previous regimens (1, 2, or ≥3), performance status (0 or 1), and planned standard-of-care regimen. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival while receiving randomised therapy, as assessed by imaging at baseline, once every 8 weeks for 15 months, and then once every 3 months thereafter, in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study therapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02101788, and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Feb 27, 2014, and April 10, 2018, 260 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the trametinib group (n=130) or the standard-of-care group (n=130). At the primary analysis, there were 217 progression-free survival events (101 [78%] in the trametinib group and 116 [89%] in the standard-of-care group). Median progression-free survival in the trametinib group was 13·0 months (95% CI 9·9–15·0) compared with 7·2 months (5·6–9·9) in the standard-of-care group (hazard ratio 0·48 [95% CI 0·36–0·64]; p<0·0001). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the trametinib group were skin rash (17 [13%] of 128), anaemia (16 [13%]), hypertension (15 [12%]), diarrhoea (13 [10%]), nausea (12 [9%]), and fatigue (ten [8%]). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the standard-of-care group were abdominal pain (22 [17%]), nausea (14 [11%]), anaemia (12 [10%]), and vomiting (ten [8%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Trametinib represents a new standard-of-care option for patients with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma. FUNDING: NRG Oncology, Cancer Research UK, Target Ovarian Cancer, and Novartis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8819271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88192712022-02-11 Trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (GOG 281/LOGS): an international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial Gershenson, David M Miller, Austin Brady, William E Paul, James Carty, Karen Rodgers, William Millan, David Coleman, Robert L Moore, Kathleen N Banerjee, Susana Connolly, Kate Secord, Angeles Alvarez O'Malley, David M Dorigo, Oliver Gaillard, Stephanie Gabra, Hani Slomovitz, Brian Hanjani, Parviz Farley, John Churchman, Michael Ewing, Ailith Hollis, Robert L Herrington, C Simon Huang, Helen Q Wenzel, Lari Gourley, Charlie Lancet Articles BACKGROUND: Low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum is characterised by MAPK pathway aberrations and its reduced sensitivity to chemotherapy relative to high-grade serous carcinoma. We compared the MEK inhibitor trametinib to physician's choice standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma. METHODS: This international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial was done at 84 hospitals in the USA and UK. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma and measurable disease, as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1, had received at least one platinum-based regimen, but not all five standard-of-care drugs, and had received an unlimited number of previous regimens. Patients with serous borderline tumours or tumours containing low-grade serous and high-grade serous carcinoma were excluded. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oral trametinib 2 mg once daily (trametinib group) or one of five standard-of-care treatment options (standard-of-care group): intravenous paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) by body surface area on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle; intravenous pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40–50 mg/m(2) by body surface area once every 4 weeks; intravenous topotecan 4 mg/m(2) by body surface area on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle; oral letrozole 2·5 mg once daily; or oral tamoxifen 20 mg twice daily. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region (USA or UK), number of previous regimens (1, 2, or ≥3), performance status (0 or 1), and planned standard-of-care regimen. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival while receiving randomised therapy, as assessed by imaging at baseline, once every 8 weeks for 15 months, and then once every 3 months thereafter, in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study therapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02101788, and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Feb 27, 2014, and April 10, 2018, 260 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the trametinib group (n=130) or the standard-of-care group (n=130). At the primary analysis, there were 217 progression-free survival events (101 [78%] in the trametinib group and 116 [89%] in the standard-of-care group). Median progression-free survival in the trametinib group was 13·0 months (95% CI 9·9–15·0) compared with 7·2 months (5·6–9·9) in the standard-of-care group (hazard ratio 0·48 [95% CI 0·36–0·64]; p<0·0001). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the trametinib group were skin rash (17 [13%] of 128), anaemia (16 [13%]), hypertension (15 [12%]), diarrhoea (13 [10%]), nausea (12 [9%]), and fatigue (ten [8%]). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the standard-of-care group were abdominal pain (22 [17%]), nausea (14 [11%]), anaemia (12 [10%]), and vomiting (ten [8%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Trametinib represents a new standard-of-care option for patients with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma. FUNDING: NRG Oncology, Cancer Research UK, Target Ovarian Cancer, and Novartis. Elsevier 2022-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8819271/ /pubmed/35123694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02175-9 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Gershenson, David M
Miller, Austin
Brady, William E
Paul, James
Carty, Karen
Rodgers, William
Millan, David
Coleman, Robert L
Moore, Kathleen N
Banerjee, Susana
Connolly, Kate
Secord, Angeles Alvarez
O'Malley, David M
Dorigo, Oliver
Gaillard, Stephanie
Gabra, Hani
Slomovitz, Brian
Hanjani, Parviz
Farley, John
Churchman, Michael
Ewing, Ailith
Hollis, Robert L
Herrington, C Simon
Huang, Helen Q
Wenzel, Lari
Gourley, Charlie
Trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (GOG 281/LOGS): an international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial
title Trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (GOG 281/LOGS): an international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial
title_full Trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (GOG 281/LOGS): an international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial
title_fullStr Trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (GOG 281/LOGS): an international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial
title_full_unstemmed Trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (GOG 281/LOGS): an international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial
title_short Trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (GOG 281/LOGS): an international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial
title_sort trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (gog 281/logs): an international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02175-9
work_keys_str_mv AT gershensondavidm trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT milleraustin trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT bradywilliame trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT pauljames trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT cartykaren trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT rodgerswilliam trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT millandavid trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT colemanrobertl trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT moorekathleenn trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT banerjeesusana trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT connollykate trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT secordangelesalvarez trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT omalleydavidm trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT dorigooliver trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT gaillardstephanie trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT gabrahani trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT slomovitzbrian trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT hanjaniparviz trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT farleyjohn trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT churchmanmichael trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT ewingailith trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT hollisrobertl trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT herringtoncsimon trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT huanghelenq trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT wenzellari trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial
AT gourleycharlie trametinibversusstandardofcareinpatientswithrecurrentlowgradeserousovariancancergog281logsaninternationalrandomisedopenlabelmulticentrephase23trial