Cargando…

Evaluation of forage production, feed value, and ensilability of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)

Whole-plant corn (Zea may L.) and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] are major summer crops that can be fed as direct-cut or silage. Proso millet is a short-season growing crop with distinct agronomic characteristics that can be productive in marginal lands. However, information...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Sheng Nan, Jeong, Eun Chan, Li, Yan Fen, Kim, Hak Jin, Ahmadi, Farhad, Kim, Jong Geun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174341
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e131
_version_ 1784646035365167104
author Wei, Sheng Nan
Jeong, Eun Chan
Li, Yan Fen
Kim, Hak Jin
Ahmadi, Farhad
Kim, Jong Geun
author_facet Wei, Sheng Nan
Jeong, Eun Chan
Li, Yan Fen
Kim, Hak Jin
Ahmadi, Farhad
Kim, Jong Geun
author_sort Wei, Sheng Nan
collection PubMed
description Whole-plant corn (Zea may L.) and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] are major summer crops that can be fed as direct-cut or silage. Proso millet is a short-season growing crop with distinct agronomic characteristics that can be productive in marginal lands. However, information is limited about the potential production, feed value, and ensilability of proso millet forage. We evaluated proso millet as a silage crop in comparison with conventional silage crops. Proso millet was sown on June 8 and harvested on September 5 at soft-dough stage. Corn and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid were planted on May 10 and harvested on September 10 at the half milk-line and soft-dough stages, respectively. The fermentation was evaluated at 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 45 days after ensiling. Although forage yield of proso millet was lower than corn and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid, its relative feed value was greater than sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. Concentrations of dry matter (DM), crude protein, and water-soluble carbohydrate decreased commonly in the ensiling forage crops. The DM loss was greater in proso millet than those in corn and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. The in vitro dry matter digestibility declined in the forage crops as fermentation progressed. In the early stages of fermentation, pH dropped rapidly, which was stabilized in the later stages. Compared to corn and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid, the concentration of ammonia-nitrogen was greater in proso millet. The count of lactic acid bacteria reached the maximum level on day 10, with the values of 6.96, 7.77, and 6.95 Log(10) CFU/g fresh weight for proso millet, corn, and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid, respectively. As ensiling progressed, the concentrations of lactic acid and acetic acid of the three crops increased and lactic acid proportion became higher in the order of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid, corn, and proso millet. Overall, the shorter, fast-growing proso millet comparing with corn and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid makes this forage crop an alternative option, particularly in areas where agricultural inputs are limited. However, additional research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of viable strategies such as chemical additives or microbial inoculants to minimize ammonia-nitrogen formation and DM loss during ensiling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8819318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88193182022-02-15 Evaluation of forage production, feed value, and ensilability of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) Wei, Sheng Nan Jeong, Eun Chan Li, Yan Fen Kim, Hak Jin Ahmadi, Farhad Kim, Jong Geun J Anim Sci Technol Research Article Whole-plant corn (Zea may L.) and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] are major summer crops that can be fed as direct-cut or silage. Proso millet is a short-season growing crop with distinct agronomic characteristics that can be productive in marginal lands. However, information is limited about the potential production, feed value, and ensilability of proso millet forage. We evaluated proso millet as a silage crop in comparison with conventional silage crops. Proso millet was sown on June 8 and harvested on September 5 at soft-dough stage. Corn and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid were planted on May 10 and harvested on September 10 at the half milk-line and soft-dough stages, respectively. The fermentation was evaluated at 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 45 days after ensiling. Although forage yield of proso millet was lower than corn and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid, its relative feed value was greater than sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. Concentrations of dry matter (DM), crude protein, and water-soluble carbohydrate decreased commonly in the ensiling forage crops. The DM loss was greater in proso millet than those in corn and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. The in vitro dry matter digestibility declined in the forage crops as fermentation progressed. In the early stages of fermentation, pH dropped rapidly, which was stabilized in the later stages. Compared to corn and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid, the concentration of ammonia-nitrogen was greater in proso millet. The count of lactic acid bacteria reached the maximum level on day 10, with the values of 6.96, 7.77, and 6.95 Log(10) CFU/g fresh weight for proso millet, corn, and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid, respectively. As ensiling progressed, the concentrations of lactic acid and acetic acid of the three crops increased and lactic acid proportion became higher in the order of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid, corn, and proso millet. Overall, the shorter, fast-growing proso millet comparing with corn and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid makes this forage crop an alternative option, particularly in areas where agricultural inputs are limited. However, additional research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of viable strategies such as chemical additives or microbial inoculants to minimize ammonia-nitrogen formation and DM loss during ensiling. Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology 2022-01 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8819318/ /pubmed/35174341 http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e131 Text en © Copyright 2022 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wei, Sheng Nan
Jeong, Eun Chan
Li, Yan Fen
Kim, Hak Jin
Ahmadi, Farhad
Kim, Jong Geun
Evaluation of forage production, feed value, and ensilability of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)
title Evaluation of forage production, feed value, and ensilability of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)
title_full Evaluation of forage production, feed value, and ensilability of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)
title_fullStr Evaluation of forage production, feed value, and ensilability of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of forage production, feed value, and ensilability of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)
title_short Evaluation of forage production, feed value, and ensilability of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)
title_sort evaluation of forage production, feed value, and ensilability of proso millet (panicum miliaceum l.)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174341
http://dx.doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e131
work_keys_str_mv AT weishengnan evaluationofforageproductionfeedvalueandensilabilityofprosomilletpanicummiliaceuml
AT jeongeunchan evaluationofforageproductionfeedvalueandensilabilityofprosomilletpanicummiliaceuml
AT liyanfen evaluationofforageproductionfeedvalueandensilabilityofprosomilletpanicummiliaceuml
AT kimhakjin evaluationofforageproductionfeedvalueandensilabilityofprosomilletpanicummiliaceuml
AT ahmadifarhad evaluationofforageproductionfeedvalueandensilabilityofprosomilletpanicummiliaceuml
AT kimjonggeun evaluationofforageproductionfeedvalueandensilabilityofprosomilletpanicummiliaceuml